Debi Sundahl's Stripper from Writings by Women in the Industry

777 Words2 Pages

Favorite selection Sundahl, Debi (1998) "Stripper." From Sex Work: Writings by Women in the Industry In "Stripper," Debi Sundahl explains her knowledge and experiences of a sex life while working as a sex object and as well as a feminist in addition to being a liberatist. Sundhal comes accorss the idea that female sex workers are responsible for the sexual repression of women, by asserting that in truth, to any freethinking spectator the very existence of a sex worker “provides a distinction and a choice as to when a woman should be treated like a sex object and when she should not be". In this article, Sundahl intends to invent a vice-like grip in the sex business for women, as a consequence to that; Sundhal initiated in 1984 the number one women-only strip demonstration at a lesbian inn in San Francisco. Sundhal argues that the reality that women are not vigorously drawn in the sex business, in the role of proprietors, bosses as well as clients is pinpointing of the gender-based outlook of the social order. Sundhal is of the opinion that the reality that women have had practically no erotic atmosphere that is solely their own creation and for women, this experience is “intrinsically tied to the sexist attitude that a woman's role in society is to be housewife/mother/sexual servant". Sundhal has been a very successful stripper as well as an entrepreneur and advocator of liberty of physical expression. Sundahl cross-examines the prevalent gender roles; as a consequence make obvious a system to undermine these roles as her article provides significant information about the feminist or else a social scholar who has tried to have as a feature a structural investigation into a development on strippers. This article thus provides the p...

... middle of paper ...

...ary agreement. But that could not be attained in women are not taken as free individuals. Both in marriage and prostitution, Peteman asserts, women must enter and remain as a free individual, but this is not the case for both political and personal interests. Hence, in any sorts of contracts, institutionalized or un-institutionalized, women remains to be subordinate in contract to men. My view I do not like this article as it argues that in the profession of prostitution, the women are not a party of free individual in the similar fashion they are in marriage. The similarity depicted by the author is so great that there is no distinction seen in the morals and immoral of marriage and prostitution. Furthermore, I did not like this article for its vagueness in expression and changing structure of the paragraphs that is all the more confusing and very philosophical.

Open Document