Ties are pleasant to look at. They are colorful, they come in a peculiar shape, and are covered with a great variety of designs. In windy weather, they will sometimes hover in the air in front of you as you are walking before slapping you in the face. (This is uncomfortable for you, but at least it provides some amusement for onlookers.) They are, without a doubt, the strangest item in the male business suit. What do they do? You can use your pockets to put pens in, you put your coat on when it's cold, and a sturdy pair of business shoes will protect your feet from both the cold and rubbish on the ground. But ties? As clothes go, they are redundant. Their only purpose seems to be to identify the wearer as male; in that sense, they are vaguely phallic.
There is little hope for the tie. It is a dying creature. People of the present day are relentlessly informal - they never use a polite word when a swear word will do: and no-one would wear a tie if they did not have to. The tie has been starting to die out.
In the last 50 years, the tie has gone through many turbulent changes. The salaried corporate man is actually a newer invention and the uniform chosen for the white-collar worker was just that, white shirt and the mentioned tie. In the 50s, most men in “real jobs” wore ties, even at home for dinner and during weekends.
Then the Sergeant Pepper generation challenged everything, including the tie. And throughout the 80s and 90s, the tie went through both strong following and equally strong anti-sentiment, symbolizing a great debate regarding conformity, expectation and self-expression.
Generation X raised the novel idea that what you thought was important, not how you looked. Since that view often was followed by a booming share price, it was seen as a plausible alternative thesis.
Baby boomers “felt compelled to express themselves through work and to be winners in that arena,” says Molly Selvin (2006). Look back at pictures from the Great Depression and people could see men who put on ties before taking their place on soup lines. The stands at baseball games were once filled with men in ties — even on weekends. In the years after World War II, when employers created thousands of new office jobs, the sidewalks of downtown across the country were thronged by men whose necks were cloaked in soldierly stripes and solids (Geller, 2008).
Osland, Asbjorn, Nanette Clinch, and Pamela M. Wells. "When And Where Are Sagging Pants Appropriate Attire?" Journal Of Critical Incidents 5.(2012): 110-113. Business Source Premier. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.
Long before the early 19th century, the idea of ceremony-specific clothing, particularly for a one-time event, was beyond the financial means of the vast majority of the population. People tended to wear their most fashionable garments, with no real consideration of one-time use or symbolism of color or style.
New fashions were surfacing in both men’s and women’s fashions. Men were wearing Bermuda pants, baggy pants that were cut off at the knee, while women were wearing capris, tight pants that cut off just below the knee. Men were wearing tailored jackets and making a slight move towards the casual dress of today’s workplace. Women were wearing natural shoulders as opposed to the heavily padded ones of the war years. Flat, neck-hugging collars replaced the mannish collars of the late 1940’s. Waists were tightly fitted and skirts were long (Melinkoff 46). The jeans of the time were often lined with plaid flanel and dungarees were worn to the most casual occasions. The sandals of the fifties were not much different than the sandals of today.
“Bridging the Gaps” began by defining the three most dominant generations in the workforce: Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964), Generation X (those born between 1965 and 1981) and Generation Y (those born during or after 1982). Wilson stresses the importance of understanding each generation’s unique characteristics to take advantage of their strengths. This approach also minimizes confrontation when multiple generations work together. Wilson lists characteristics such as being entrepreneurial, ardent about social causes, and independent as similarities between Baby Boomers and Generation Y, while Baby Boomers and Generation X both value loyalty, focus on finances and believe in a hierarchy of order. Lastly, Generations X and Y are flexible and technologically savvy.
In Shakespeare’s play the attire that Hamlet wears are likely from the 16th century. The clothes can be described as Elizabethan. Hamlet would most likely be seen in hosen. Hosen is a 16th century term for tights or hose. Men would also wear round hose. Round hose are pants cut above the knee. The hose is puffy or round, making the hip and thighs look full. Nobles would also be seen sporting doublets. This fashionable piece of garment is a tight fitting vest that laces up. On top of doublets noblemen, princes in Hamlet's ’case would wear a gown. The gown for a man is like a doublet; it just adds an extra layer. For an added piece Hamlet could wear a ruff. Ruffs are pleated white collars worn under their tops. Hamlet’s clothing in Shakespeare's version sets up his character. The moment hamlet enters the audience knows who he is. His apparel speaks for him. Unlike in Almereyda’s Hamlet where Hamlet could be anyone of the characters.
...ame needs as an effect of consumerism on the baby boom generation. The same materialism of the 1950s conceived a new consciousness in the 1960s, equating to new values for the baby boom generation, such as self-actualization, social consciousness and tolerance. During the 1950s, the U.S. achieved the highest standard of living in the world, metamorphosing the working class into the new middle class (Monhollon xvi). The richest generation in North American history and the 21st century has left behind a plethora of valuable lessons that will not be forgotten soon. In conclusion, the baby boom, which lead to a long cycle of prosperity and growth in the post-WWII years is crucial because it redefined the traditional and rigid values people wrongfully harbored in the past and spearheaded dramatic change on a global level, bringing the West and the World closer than ever.
Before a man starts tying his necktie, he must find an appropriate shirt to wear with the tie. The kind of shirt that is appropriate to wear with a tie is a dress shirt (one with a collar), preferably long-sleeved. After he has chosen an appropriate shirt he can begin the process of tying his necktie. First, he should place the necktie around his collar with the seam of the tie facing him. He should note the lengths of the wide and narrow sides of the tie and how low...
In 1967, the New York born bred Ralph Lauren started the Polo division of Beau Brummel neckties. Ties at that time were in an Ivy League phase-dark, narrow and undistinguished. But, for several years, Mr. Lauren had harbored the nation that the time was right for a new look. And so, he pioneered the wide tie-a four-inch tie made from opulent materials and fabrications that were unheard of in the business. Polo ties soon became the status tie. And Ralph Lauren became the menswear design to watch, as his ties revolutionized the industry.
During Generation Xers formative years, “investigations called into question many major organizations including the U.S. presidency, military, organized religion, and corporations” (Fore, 2013). As a result, this generation generally had little confidence in institutions and instead placed more faith in themselves. At home, Generation Xers became “‘latchkey children’”, who came home from school without a parent or adult supervision, and their mothers now worked outside the home. They were responsible for themselves, and often became dependent on video games and television sets, which resulted in them being characterized as “independent and resourceful” (Fore, 2013). At work, Generation Xers relied on themselves and their peers to accomplish goals, and did not put much hope in companies or organizations. Unlike Veterans, Generation Xers disliked traditional hierarchy, challenged authority, and expected their leaders to demonstrate competence and fairness, as well as embrace a participative and diverse workplace (Fore, 2013). Similar to the Millennial generation, Generation Xers placed a stronger focus on their personal lives much more than the generations before them. “They were likely to stay with one company throughout their career as long as it did not interfere with their private lives” (Gilley & Waddell, 2015). This lack of organizational loyalty is often attributed to
Note (3) highlights the clothes worn by the boy and the man in the picture. The boy is dressed for school and the man is dressed in a suit for work. The suit implies a successful businessman (Na et al. 1999). This is an icon which implies he is from an upper-middle class social-economic categories AB1 (Dibb et al. 2006).
Generation X refers to the population cohort following the Baby Boomers. Sources differ as to the exact years during which this cohort was born. Coupland (1991) suggests 1960 to 1970; Bradford and Raines (1992) propose 1965 to 1975; and Howe and Strauss (1993) suggest 1961 to 1981. Whatever the birth years, it is their common life experiences that give this cohort an identity. Individuals born in Generation X are reputedly more global, technologically oriented, and culturally diverse than the generations before them. Coming of age when the linear career path no longer exists, where average income is falling, and where continuous change is the norm, does this generation have different values, work ethics, and attitudes toward work and career development? As the myths and realities of this question are explored, it is important to remember that the characteristics, habits, and traits attributed to individuals in this cohort are mere generalizations, presented to afford a better understanding of the generation called Generation X.
We live in a violent world where hundreds of people are killed every day for little to no reason. Now what if a simple change could prevent this, what if all it took to change our society from one of violence to one focused on reason was a simple change of clothes. Around the country this theory is being tested that if we simply change our schools from simply requiring a limited range of clothes to a standard set of clothing. Uniforms are being implemented in the hopes to end violence and promote the community in which they live. This change started in the 1980’s where before only Catholic schools required uniforms, and this change has even had support from one of our presidents to help cease the spread of crime that is plaguing the nation
Moreover, it also was a remarkable change with dressing styles under the circle of mini to maxi. Generally, in the 60s people’s dressing was stilted, unattractive and confined (Tracy Tolkien, 2002). However, young people experienced the highest incomes period after the Second World War. Therefore, they began to put more attention outside the basic human supply.... ...
As uniforms were required in most schools in the past, we all know it was also a trending fashion in work environments for various reasons. Although we can see more freedom about dress codes in recent years, we were stricter in this regard in the past, as we just come to realize it. It was a mandatory dress code almost in every school across the World. As times have changed along with our culture, work ethics along with technology, we are now discussing whether to go back to uniform days. Making it a mandatory again in most schools as it is getting out of hand with economical differences of families, internet and fashion. As these facts are
Discipline is vital for schools to run smoothly. In a school environment students must obey their teacher’s rules and directions. Sometimes students may forget or misunderstand who the authority figures are at school. When a school establishes a uniform policy they are reinforcing who is in charge because these outfits set guidelines of expectations for each student. When students are properly dressed and have the tools needed to learn they are on the track to success because they are no longer distracted by their clothing. Some people may say that clothing do not make differences on the way someone acts, but in actuality they do. Professional clothing symbolize respect and seriousness. That is why this outfits are worn to funerals, work, job interviews, and church. (Arundel) Casual clothing gives off the impression that if they can wear whatever they want, they can als...