Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter Seven: Business and the Environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chapter Seven: Business and the Environment
The world over, people have developed into an enigma of wanting the best. No matter how basic the service is or the product, despite their being market domination, this quest has seen every service provider fight to offer the best their services have to offer. Based on this realization as Gronroos (1990) points out the increase in productivity has been greatly influenced over the years by peripheral factors like client gratification. This has been the advantage of capitalism. Service providers have realized that offering a service is not good enough. This has in most cases been deemed to be the reason why corporate governance is of great importance where properly manifested. To this end one has to ensure that the two are above reproach to win that niche. This paper will evaluate how failure to respect this power has seen the numerous civil, criminal and class actions suits against Dale and where such problems rose from.
Public trust is an issue of great importance with reference to corporate responsibility. A company can easily lose its market share as well as profit margin where such trust becomes questionable. A company thus needs to ensure that they protect their public image so as to avoid a scenario where such trust is lost and or questioned. In most cases thus, what has been the case has been a circumstance where companies have had to go out of their way to ensure that they fulfill their corporate duties by not only providing quality services and products to their clients but also ensure that their products meet the expectations of their clients. What has been noted is that where the same fails to be met, potential clients have been known to boycott products of such companies at times to even a global perspective (Klein, S...
... middle of paper ...
...y duty to proof the genuine nature in the product but rather that of Intercontinental and Freshness Juice Company. As such the company instead of brushing off my opinions should have put their supplier at task to proof the authentic of their products.
References
Gronroos, C., (1990). Service Management: A Management Focus for Service Competition.
International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1(1), p.305-359. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09564239010139125.
Klein, J., Smith, N., & John, A., (2004). Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott
Participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92-109. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Strauss, D. M., (2009). Justice, legal validity and the force of law with special reference to
Derrida, Dooyeweerd and Habermas. South African Journal of Philosophy, 28(1), 65-87. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Melvin, Justice. "In The Supreme Court Of British Columbia." Issues In Law & Medicine 9.3 (1993): 309. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2013.
Gunther, G. (1991). Constitutional Law. Twelfth Edition. New York: The Foundation Press, Inc. pp. 1154-1161.
Rehnquist, William H., Brennan, William J. "A Casebook on the Law and Society: What Rights
The United States v. Thomas J.L. Smiley et al.. (n.d) retrieved 1 February 2012, from Google Books Web Site:
(1) McDowell, Josh. The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict (Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1999), p. 55.
Reece H., ‘The paramountcy principle Consensus or construct?’ [1996] 49 Current Legal Problems p. 267-304
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
Raz, Joseph, 1979. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hobson, Charles F. The Great Chief Justice, John Marshall And the Rule Of Law. University Press Of Kansas: Wison Garey McWilliams & Lance Banning, 1996.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
This theory looks at how the sovereign and its officials created the law based on social norms and the institutions (Hart, 1958). However, hard cases such as this makes for bad law, which test the validity of the law at hand based on what the objective of the law was in the first place. The law should not be so easily dismissed just because it does not achieve justice in the most morally sound manner (Hart, 1958). Bentham and Austin understood that there are two errors in the way law is understood, what the law is and what the law should be (Hart, 1958). He knew that if law was to become what humans perceived the law ought to be, the law itself would be lost, but he also recognized that if the opposite was to occur where the law replaced morality, than any man would escape liability and there would be no retribution (Hart, 1958). This theory looks at the point of view of the dissenting judge, Justice Gray, which is that the law is what it is, even if it may conflict with morals. Austin stated that “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry (Hart, 1958).” This case presents the same conflict that Bentham and Austin addressed, that the law based on the statute of the
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
Van Dervort, T. (2000). American Law and the Legal System: Equal Justice under the Law. (2nd
The relationship between law and morality has been argued over by legal theorists for centuries. The debate is constantly be readdressed with new cases raising important moral and legal questions. This essay will explain the nature of law and morality and how they are linked.
Schwartz, Bernard. Decision: How the Supreme Court Decides Cases. New York: Oxford UP, 1996. Print.