Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essays on curfews
Negative effects of curfews
Are Curfews Effective When Keeping Teens Out of Trouble
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essays on curfews
“A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither.” ~ Thomas Jefferson. This quote epitomizes my position that curfews should be eliminated. Liberty is a concept in political philosophy that means human beings are able to govern themselves and behave according to their own free will. Curfews ignore the idea of liberty and have not proven themselves as a successful tool against juvenile crime and yet are popularly utilized throughout the United States. Curfews should be eliminated because they violate Constitutional rights, they can lead to discrimination and profiling of youth, and they take away resources, including money and time, from law enforcement.
The rights of freedom and speech have long been recognized by the Supreme Court, and freedom of speech and assembly go hand in hand. The fourteenth amendment guarantees that either state or local governments cannot take away first amendment rights. With that being said lets look at the constitutionality of legal curfews. Over the last decade or so, many of the juvenile curfew laws have been challenged due to the belief that they violate First Amendment rights as detailed in the state and U.S. constitutions. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and many other civil liberty groups have become very active in challenging these curfew laws to help protect the rights of all U.S. citizens. The First Amendment says that Congress can make no laws that prohibit people from peaceably assembling which in the simplest translation means laws cannot keep people from hanging out together peacefully. Curfews are passed to prevent groups of people as well as individuals from assembling or gathering in public places at certain hours. ...
... middle of paper ...
...U.S. citizens are as important to you as they are to me than I hope you will stand against curfew law.
Works Cited
Males, Mike. Macallair, Dan. "An Analysis of Curfew Enforcement and Juvenile Crime." Nya. 1999. National youth rights association, Web. April 16, 2011. .
Rands, Geoff. "Profiling classes." Marshall democrat 2009, . .Print.
Unknown. "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School ." First amendment center. April 2011. Vanderbilt university, Web. April 16, 2011. .
Unknown. "Juvenile justice reform initiatives in the states 1994-1996." Office of juvenile justice and deliquency prevention. unknown. Ojjdp, Web. April 19, 2011. .
Everyday we have the chance to make her own opinions and give reason to our own voice. We have the chance to live in a country that encourages freedom in society, which separate ourselves from any restrictions imposed upon by authority, actions or any political views. liberty is the power we possess to act as we please through freedom and independence. But what happens when we choose to give away our basic liberties for temporary safety? Benjamin Franklin once stated, “They who give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Those who decide to give away their personal freedoms for something that is temporary do not see the value in the long-lasting gift called freedom. In
...as, J., J. Stewart, J. White, J. Black, and J. Harlan. "Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School District (No. 21)." Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, 24 Feb. 1969. Web. 29 Oct. 2013. .
Tedford, Thomas L., and Dale A. Herbeck. Freedom of Speech in the United States. State College, PA: Strata Publishing, Inc., 2009. Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School District. Web. 28 Oct. 2013. .
Jenson, Jeffrey and Howard, Matthew. "Youth Crime, Public Policy, and Practice in the Juvenile Justice System: Recent Trends and Needed Reforms." Social Work 43 (1998): 324-32
Juvenile Justice Reforms in the United States. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2011, from Juvenile Transfer to Criminal Courts: http://www.ojjdp.gov
First Amendment Rights of Public School Students How the judicial branch rules in cases relating to the 1st and how they relate that to all the rights of public school students. This includes anything from flag burning to not saluting the flag to practicing religion in school. The main point of this paper is to focus on the fact that schools have a greater ability to restrict speech than government. Research Question Does government or school districts have the ability to restrict free speech? This is a very important question because this gives great power to one over the other.
There have been many cases where exceptions have been made over the first amendment, such as in the Tinker vs. Des Moines Community School District Case. Teenagers by the name of Christopher Eckhardt and Mary Beth Tinker had planned to wear black armbands to their school to show their support for a truce in the Vietnam War. When word reached the principle, of Christopher and Mary Beth’s plan to arrive with the black armbands, the principal created a policy stating that, “any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension.” (The Oyez Project). After being kicked out of school, Tinker’s parents sued them but their case was dismissed due to the fact that the first amendment does not grant one the right to express their opinion at any place nor at any time. Another official claimed that the first amendment is not fully guaranteed to children. While the first amendment may be a boon to the United States, it is not always just. There are limitations, and conditions surrounding the first amendment and our freedom of speech. In Tinker’s case, her armband was seen as disruptive, and distracting to other students, justifying the school’s actions against the student of suspending and eventually expelling
---. National Center for Juvenile Justice, Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report. GPO, 1999.
"Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist." Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist. N.p., 12 Nov. 1968. Web. 10 Nov. 2013.
Cities that have curfew law experience fewer teens’ crimes and victimization. When Lake County had an issue with teens’ crimes, the police department forced curfews for teens under 16 years old (Courtney). As a result, Lake County Sheriff reported that the number of teen crimes decreased (Courtney). Moreover, a study research for 54 U.S cities with 180,000 or more residents has been done by the University of California shows that youth arrests dropped by 10 percent.
It was irrational for these students to be suspended from the school. The high school students named John F. Tinker, who was fifteen-years-old, John’s younger sister Mary Beth Tinker, who was thirteen-years-old, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt, who was sixteen years old, should not have been suspended. They were under the protection of the First Amendment. The parents of those students sued the school district for violating the students’ right of expressions and sought an injunction to prevent the school from decupling the students. The Supreme Court of the United Sates stepped in and the question of law was if. They ruled in the favor of the Tinker’s because it was in a seven to two decision "Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community School District."
Amendment one, freedom of speech is a very important factor for all citizens to have. Amendment one protects citizens to freely speak their mind without disturbing the educational process. The government may not put any consequences to any citizens from accessing information and freely speak. The government must protect citizens from unreasonable consequences, such as making signs, posting honestly, and letters that do no threat. The court case that involved amendment one is Tinker vs. Des Moines in 1964. Mary Beth Tinker and her brother wore black armbands to memorialize the Vietnam War. The principle, Des Moines suspened both of them because they refused to take them off. The court case was sent to the Supreme court because Des Moine interfered with Tinker’s right of freedom of speech. The ruling was seven to two in Tinkers favor. The Supreme court stated that students...
OJJDP: Juvenile offenders and victims, 1999 National Report. (n.d), National Report. Retrieved November 19, 2013, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/nationalreport99
In conclusion, having the curfew law in effect helps out the whole community and states by reducing crime rates. Even though there have been debates on the subject whether the law helps or not speculators say that it does benefit the community. Just by looking at the statistics it shows a decrease in overall crime rates. In turn helping the minors stay safer and out of trouble late at night when they could be doing drugs or consuming alcohol. It also reduces the amount of teenage deaths and gang activities. So keeping the law In effect makes the world a better place to grow up in.
spraying graffiti on public places, ect. In many cities crime rates among teens have declined at substantial amounts. The U.S Conference of Mayors surveyed mayors in 347 cities with curfews and found that 88 percent of the cities found that curfews made their streets safer for residents. While only 72 of the 347 cities had daytime curfews, 100 percent of those cities showed a decrease in truancy and daytime crime. Gang related problems also d...