The Crucible by Arthur Miller and McCarthyism

1395 Words3 Pages

In the 1950s, Arthur Miller was accused of being a sympathizer to communism, and was one of the three hundred and twenty artists blacklisted by Congress (Arthur Miller: McCarthyism). Arthur Miller was angered by the accusations without evidence to back them up, and hit a boiling point after famed director Elia Kazan went in front of House Un-American Activities Committee and named some of his peers as communist sympathizers (Arthur Miller: McCarthyism). After a meeting with Kazan to discuss why he did what he did, a tumultuous relationship between the direction and playwright began, and Miller began research on the Salem witch trials (Fisher 255). Miller used the “Salem witch trials as the basis for an allegorical portrayal of the HUAC hearings” in his play, The Crucible (Teachout, “Concurring with Arthur Miller” 72). McCarthyism, much like the witchcraft fever of Salem, Massachusetts, unfairly judged people of their crimes, in this case, communism,, less based on evidence than personal prejudices.
The maniacal McCarthyism era “was the product of U.S. fear at both the governmental and popular level that Communism was not only on the rise, but also a direct threat to the country” (Wisseman 320). The end of World War II was witness to the growing strength of communism in the world. Although an ally during World War II, the United States found itself in the Cold War with Russia shortly after. Even though Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s actions for the communist crackdown and his creation of the House Un-American Activities Committee gave the era its name, anticommunism had been strong for several years beforehand (Schrecker 1043). Inferred by political scientist Earl Latham, the 1948 presidential election gave attention to anticommunism feeli...

... middle of paper ...

...4): 1041-1086. Academic Search Premier. Infohio. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Teachout, Terry. “Concurring with Arthur Miller: A Playwright Primarily Beloved for His Politics.” Commentary 127.6 (2009): 71-73. MasterFILE Premier. Infohio. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
---“The Duke and the Reds.” Commentary 135.2 (2013): 55-58. MasterFILE Premier. Infohio. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.
Williamson-Lot, Joy Ann. “The Battle over Power, Control, and Academic Freedom at Southern Institutions of Higher Education, 155-1965.” Journal of Southern History 79.4 (2013): 879-920. Academic Search Premier. Infohio. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Wisseman, Nicholas. “Falsely Accused: Cold War Liberalism Reassessed.” Historian 66. 2 (2004); 320-334. Academic Search Premier. Infohio. Web. 3 Mar. 2014.
Ybarra, Michael J. “Blacklist Whitewash.” New Republic 218.1 (1998): 20-23. Academic Search Premier. Infohio. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.

Open Document