Critique: “No Long Term: New Work and the Corrosion of Character”

996 Words2 Pages

In reading this passage “No Long Term: New Work and the Corrosion of Character” by Sociologist Richard Sennett which first appeared in The Personal Consequences of work in the New Capitalism(1998); he begins by claiming that today’s work ethics are so different from past generations. Sennett finds that in past generations things were long-term and today things are short-term resulting in a conflict between character and experience. In reading it has broadened my opinion of how much change that has happened in such a short period of time concerning work ethic.

Unquestionably, Sennett has a compelling educational background; being a professor of Humanities at New York University and London School of Economics. Perhaps this is why his writing is easy to comprehend, giving the reader the feeling of being almost instructive. Sennett has done a quality job at not showing bias toward either generation, but does hint that he leans more towards today with economical advancements.

Sennett describes the contrast of stability between Enrico and his son Rico. Enrico is a janitor who has a pension, job security within a union, along with the peace of mind in knowing where he will finish his life in the work force. On the hand, Rico has moved four times since graduating college, carries the feeling of losing control, with no fixed role of what he is accountable for concerning work, along with no security in his present employment. Sennett makes a great point in reflection to time, “ How can long-term purposes be pursued in a short-term society…How can a human being develop a narrative of identity and life history in a society composed of episodes and fragments(226)?” I feel his finding are reasonable that history is what molds us, ...

... middle of paper ...

...r today as to past generations. The author has provided a comprehensive amount of evidence as in human behavior, demographics, social class. I would have liked to see some experts opinion stating that today’s generation is lacking character due to their work places. In other words, I feel that the passage is from more of a sociologist stand point than proven with an empirical research. I feel that Sennett’s focus is too much on the personal consequences of work not the social consequence. It also could have included more information about the social effects from our lack of stability.

Work Cited

Behrens, Laurence, and Leonard J. Rosen. Writing and Reading across the Curriculum.

Boston: Longman, 2011. Print. 11 Sept. 2011

Sago, Brad. Uncommon Threads: Mending the Generation Gap

at Work. Executive Update, July 2000. Web.12 Sept. 2011.

More about Critique: “No Long Term: New Work and the Corrosion of Character”

Open Document