Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Decision making techniques case study
Decision making techniques case study
Decision making tools and techniques essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Decision making techniques case study
Critical Thinking and Computer Logic
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss a decision-making tool or technique as discussed in week three. The paper will contain a discussion of the tool or technique and an application example. It will also include an example of when and when not to use the tool or technique. The paper will conclude with a brief summation.
Tools and Techniques Paper
Individuals, organizations, and social groups are often faced with the challenge of solving difficult problems and making important, strategic decisions. For a group to be successful, it must find methods to creatively resolve problems and focus on reaching goals and achieving results. There are many individual and group techniques that can be used to identify and solve problems. These techniques are thinking strategies intended to bring out the creative vigor of individuals and generate ideas and approaches to resolving problems and making effective decisions. (Hughes, 2003)
An effective procedure known as the Charette Procedure is a group idea producing and prioritizing tool. Its strength is its capacity to address several issues at the same time in a highly interactive group environment. The Charette Procedure entails several small groups discussing parts of the issue(s) at the same time generating as many ideas as possible. Then their ideas are passed on to the next group for further development, enlargement, and in the long run prioritization. The Charette Procedure is especially useful when a group has decided on what they want to do, but is unsure of all the details involved in the process to accomplish the goal(s).
This tool is very effective in several ways. It can address several issues at the same time and encourages active participation on the part of the group members. It can share the management duty of the group(s) among a variety of members. This allows participants to take an active role in the guidance of the group(s). It can build upon ideas generated by others by keeping the dialogue positive and interesting. (Tague, 2004)
The process of the Charette Procedure is quite detailed, but very rewarding. First, the participants are divided into small groups, either by numbering off, or by some other method. Each group must select an individual recorder, and then they are given a discussion topic or question. If there are many small groups, then some groups may receive the same discussion topic or question.
This involves choosing from a lot of alternatives of ideas and producing a strategy on how they will be able to make trade-offs. The team’s activities here include ambassadorship and task coordination. The key leadership activities here include visioning and inventing.
Roy, B. (1993). Decision science or decision-aid science? European journal of operational research , 66 (2), 184-203.
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
As the processes and systems used in business have become more complex, teams, not individuals, have become popular in many organizations. Teams are made up of individuals from an organization brought together to solve a problem, improve a process or implement a new process. “A major advantage that a team has over an individual is its diversity of resources and ideas” (Burns, 1995, p. 52). However, this diversity can cause conflict within the team. The success of the team is strongly influenced by the team’s ability to recognize the causes of, manage and resolve conflict.
Critical thinking and decision-making are related in more ways than people think. This paper will define critical thinking and decision-making according to the book Whatever It Takes. It will also present a personal definition of critical thinking and decision-making from the author of this paper. The relationship between the two will be explained as well as the benefits of being a critical thinker. The author of this paper will also show how critical thinking is present in his organization and how he implements critical thinking techniques on a daily basis.
The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the Group Techniques. 3rd edn. of the year. London: Thomson Learning COREY, M.S. -.
One thing to remember when using any decision-making tool is to keep the end in mind. In other words when working through a process, visualizing the end result is Helpful. We must also remember that in every decision-making process there are a multitude of tools to help us along the way. No tool is really better then another, in fact most are made to compliment each other not as a soul solution to the process at hand.
Engleberg, I., Wynn, D., & Schuttler, R., (2003). Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies (3rd ed.) Boston: Houghton- Mifflin. pp. 146- 170.
Corey, Corey, and Corey (2010) describe the main focus of task groups, to be the application of group dynamic principles and processes to improve, practice, and foster the accomplishment of identified work goals. In a task group setting, the members usually work together to complete a specific goal. Corey, Corey, and Corey (2010) describe task group leade...
The following is a decision-making model that I have used to arrive at a decision.
In my experience and in this small group project I would be one of the more vocal people. By avoiding intimidating or shutting anyone out, it is important to have each person brain write to avoid any hesitation from others. In my current small group, we partake in electronic brainstorming. Each of us sat down at a computer and found articles that we thought was best fit to the solutions to the problem. After finding our articles we then posted them to google docs where we are now in the process of evaluating them. This makes it easier for everyone to find articles that connects to them. When we tired of thinking of new ideas we take a brake and talk about each other’s lives. I like to as all my groups what we plan on doing over the weekend and we also do it in our class when (Dr. Davis) asks us how our weekend was or even what is happening this weekend, giving us a break from thinking about school related items so we can start fresh. Brainstorming is important to do and is the best way to come up with the best
Baron, Robert S., Kerr, Norbert K., and Miller, Norman. Group process, Group Decision, Group Action. CA: Brooks/Cole, 1992. Pgs. 4, 61, 2, 140, 237, 140, 141, 7, 6
McShane, Steven, and Mary Ann Von Glinow. Chapter 8: Decision Making and Creativity. PRIMIS MNO 6202: Managing Organizations. 2004. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' Reprint of the book.
Making decisions is an important part of our everyday life. Decisions define actions and lead to the achievement of goals. However, these depend on the effectiveness of the decision-making process. An effective decision is free from biases, uncertainties, and is deeply dependent on information and critical thinking. Poor decisions lead to the inability to achieve set objectives and could lead to losses, if finance is a factor. Therefore, it is important to contemplate about quality and ways to achieve it in decision-making, which is the focus of this paper. The purpose is to look into the needs of decision-making, including what one should do and what one should not do.
Brainstorming is a technique that is widely used in big corporates now a day. Brainstorming is generally used to come up with ideas for critical problems. The process of brainstorming is bringing different kind of people with different mindsets who are from diversified community. They may be from different genders, from different religions, from different sectors, from different tribes or from different cultural backgrounds etc., Idea of inviting different type of people is to get different thoughts. Bringing up these thoughts will take the topic to a next level of thinking. This concept was developed by Mr. Alex Osborn in 1941.(brainstorming) Many researchers were contributed their developments since then.