Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sustainable development(essay)
the relevence of sustainable development to development
the concept of sustainable development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sustainable development(essay)
Introduction
Since the late 1980s, the notion of ‘sustainable development’ has transcended beyond the eminent United Nations report titled Our Common Future, to mainstream dialogue throughout the globe at all scales within government and public spheres. This form of development seeks to balance current environmental, social and economic needs of the population, “without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, 43). Used interchangeably with ‘sustainability’ (Seghezzo, 2009), the concept has been fastened to a plethora of themes, including that of cities where ‘urban sustainability’ speaks to negligent urban expansion and resource depletion. However, as the idea of urban sustainability has begun percolating into widespread discussions, so to have the obstacles and conflicts surrounding sustainable development. The following sections will examine these complexities, beginning with the ambiguity of sustainable development, followed by interpretations of urban sustainability, and finally, the political ecology of sustainable development in an urban environment.
Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development
Critique of the term ‘sustainable development’ has primarily surrounded its wide scope of interpretation, which is regarded as both a strength, in its ability to foster multi-stakeholder cooperation, and a weakness, in that anybody can claim they are contributing to sustainability goals (Dale, 2001; Robinson, 2009). Satterthwaite’s article entitled “Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development” (1997), alludes to the ambiguity of the term and explores the predicament rather than benefit th...
... middle of paper ...
...18(1), 67-85.
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable Development (1987-2005): An Oxymoron Comes of Age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212-227.
Robbins, P. (2004). What is Political Ecology? In Political Ecology (pp. 1-15).Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Robinson, P. (2009). Urban Sustainability in Canada: The Global-Local Connection. In C. Gore, & P. Stoett (Eds.), Environmental Challenges and Opportunities: Local-Global Perspectives on Canadian Issues (pp. 159-181). Toronto: Edmond Montgomery Publications.
Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539 - 556.
Satterthwaite, D. (1997). Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development? Urban Studies, 34(1), 1667-1691.
WCED. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
The fifth section compares and contrasts the two opposing visions of environmentalism: Livingstone 's “big-city modernism” and Prince Charles 's “agrarian utopianism” (p. 215). After evaluating the contrasting visions, Glaeser supports the urban dense living. The sixth section highlights the challenge of sustainable urban development in developing economies. He compares the carbon emissions per household between China, India and America. The growing car usage including the “Tata’s $2500 car” suggests rise in future traffic jams and carbon emissions (p. 220). The final section
Finally in 1991, the federal government initiated a ‘Better Cities Program’ which aimed to make Australian cities sustainable and more liveable. It encoura...
The following case study critiques Upton’s vision to establish a sustainable community through implementing comprehensive sustainable strategy. The urban periphery development is thought to demonstrate superior execution of sustainable principles in development (Jackson 2007). As a parallel, the report focuses on the development of Upton’s design code and demonstrates how large -scale mix-use developments can incorporate sustainable practice and principles of urban growth.
Again, this section will give a working definition of the “urban question’. To fully compare the political economy and ecological perspectives a description of the “urban question” allows the reader to better understand the divergent schools of thought. For Social Science scholars, from a variety of disciplines, the “urban question” asks how space and the urban or city are related (The City Reader, 2009). The perspective that guides the ecological and the social spatial-dialect schools of thought asks the “urban question” in separate distinct terminology. Respected scholars from the ecological mode of thinking, like Burgess, Wirth and others view society and space from the rationale that geographical scope determines society (The City Reader, 2009). The “urban question” that results from the ecological paradigm sees the relationship between the city (space) as influencing the behaviors of individuals or society in the city. On the other hand...
Sustainable urban development has therefore become a multi-faceted and critical problem that now relates to energy consumption, transportation and land use planning, community building, and environmental and social justice issues, as well as good environmental management. Two Canadian reports prepared for the United Nations make similar observations and touch on the additional issues of a lack of affordable housing, the breaking up of farmland, and aging infrastructures that perform poorly in terms of energy efficiency and the environment. It is agreed that local governments have great influence over economic innovation and social cohesion in Canada, and that the various levels of government must work closely together and citizens must be involved from the outset if we are to find answers to the problem of urban sustainability. As part of the process, stakeholders would benefit from a greater understanding of how cities implement sustainable development objectives (which relate to broader quality-of-life objectives), the key factors for making a successful transition to sustainable urban development, and the combination of government and economic tools that will advance sustainable
Urban sustainability, as stated by the World Commision on Environment and Development in 1987 (University of Technology 2013) is the idea that development needs to be sustainable to meet the needs of the current environment but also must not compromise the ability of the future to meet their needs. The stakeholder mix creates a challenging situation that urban sustainability cannot overcome as there is such a large pool of differing values, opinions, morals and preferences that there is “no easy way for people to assign a priority to a way of tackling the issue at hand.” (Troy. P 2013) . This highlights the predicament that share economy businesses, an idea rehashed as a “collaborative consumption” (The Economist 2013) of goods and services, face in the urban setting. Share economy businesses are developed with the intention of tackling a wicked problem, however their success lies in the interaction and critique of a varied mix of opinions that stakeholders
World Commission on Environment & Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ponting, Clive. ?Historical Perspective on Sustainable Development? Environment November 1990: 4-5 Dunlap, Riley E. ?Of Global Concern? Environment November 1993: 7-15
Sustainability is a concept with a diverse array of meanings and definitions – a widely used glamorous, ambiguous, ambivalent and vague concept that is used by different stakeholder groups in various ways. Presumably to avoid noodling over a terminology or to avoid the confrontation with a definition, most widely the concept is broken down a planning process (c.f. e.g. Döring & Muraca, 2010). That is why most common sustainability is understood as sustainable development.1
[WCED] World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press. 444p.
As the world’s population and ecological challenges grow in the 21st century, it is of paramount importance that new cities, towns and communities strive for “sustainability” - economically, environmentally and socially - without reducing the capacity of future generations to have their needs met.
However, despite these dwellers moving to improve their standard of living, urban growth poses a threat to sustainable development in urban areas, as it implies an increase in the consumption space (Williams 2000). The environmental impacts of urban growth have raised concerns among planners and stimulated other models of urban expansion such as "smart growth” (Mohammadi et al. 2012). Unfettered urbanisation has strained the ability of governments to manage with the increasing demands for housing, services and employment in developing countries.
Chaffey, J. (1994). The challenge of urbanisation. In M. Naish & S. Warn (Eds.), Core geography (pp. 138-146). London: Longman.
Also, the book is well designed and easy to read which makes me feel comfortable during reading this book. The editors also included core findings, new methods, and international experience in order to help us to explain more deeply about the challenges we faced in the advancement of Sustainable Urban Development, in which this might be one of the strengths of this book. Therefore, I believed it would be worthy for us to spend our time on reading this book.
As previously implied, cities are currently the antithesis of even the barest sense of sustainability. To succinctly define the term “sustainability” would be to say that it represents living within one’s needs. When it comes to the city, with almost zero local sources of food or goods, one’s means is pushed and twisted to include resources originating far beyond the boundaries of the urban landscape. Those within cities paradoxically have both minimal and vast options when it comes to continuing their existence, yet this blurred reality is entirely reliant on the resources that a city can pull in with its constantly active economy.