Critical Analysis of Rant

1208 Words3 Pages

Rant: The Oral Biography of Buster Casey is widely known as one of the Chuck Palahniuk’s most complicated reads, a mind-blowing “out-there” novel in what is typically considered a very extreme bibliography. The unconventional narrative style, plethora of contradicting narrators, and indecipherable subject matter all combine into one oral biography of a complex, incomprehensible man by the name of Buster “Rant” Casey—a man who liked to be bitten by venomous animals, a man who could discern a person’s life story from the sweat on their flesh, and a man who, even after death, taught us how we will always be slightly different versions of ourselves to different people.

The novel begins with the recollections of a car dealer on an airplane as he sees the person he will have to sit with for the duration of the flight: some cowboy hillbilly with arms so heavily scarred that, like a car crash, he can’t help but stare at. He soon learns that this terrifying man is, in fact, Chet Casey: the father of the infamous Buster Casey—the deceased maniac Nighttimer who was the “superspreader” of a rabies epidemic that sweeped the nation. And thus, the biography of Rant Casey begins.

From there, the book chronicles Rant’s childhood antics, from him actively searching out rabid dogs to bite him and give him rabies to him faking a chronic erection to get out of school. He walked in neighborhoods in his Boy Scout outfit to find stash after stash of rare, uncirculated million-dollar coins, then used this money to turn his small-town Middleton’s economy on its head. In one memorable incident, Rant was in charge of providing the “scare factors” of the annual local Haunted House, such as brains, or cooked elbow macaroni mixed with cold butter, and eyeball...

... middle of paper ...

...o be his parents, to gain power. And, from this, we can assume that Rant and Chet and Green Taylor Simms are all, in fact, the same person. Yet, Simms traveled back in time to rape Irene and Hattie and Esther Casey, while Rant and Chet both went back in time to save these same women. Palahniuk’s Rant-Chet-Simms, then, is an exaggerated, physical representation of a person’s different personas in the face of different members of society.

Rant’s oral biography is a study in personas. Palahniuk took the different versions of people in society and stretched them, making them so exaggerated that they became different people with different names. Yet, this jumbled, complicated mess all comes together to teach the same lesson: no one will ever truly know a person for who they are. After all, as Rant used to say, “You’re a different human being to everybody you meet” (18).

Open Document