Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Forensic science unit one quizlet
Forensic science unit one quizlet
Forensic science unit one quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Forensic science unit one quizlet
In any investigative work, the need to get any evidence properly analyzed is of great importance if at all the investigators need to get conclusive evidence. Whilst trying to do so, there is need to attain evidence not only on factual evidence but also any that can be deduced scientifically, thus the need for forensic labs (Geddes, 2010). One of such evidence is finger prints. In this case, there is evidence of a lottery which has blood smeared on it. Further, there is a black 9mm semi-automatic gun and a six pack of cold beer on the floor amongst other evidence that is present at the crime scene. All these have potential of having been held by the suspect criminal as well as any person who would be wrongly suspected. To this end, the finger print evidence would need to be collected so as to be collated against the weapon used to commit the murder so as to deduce evidence as to who was responsible and who was not with reference to other evidence from the eye witnesses. This is based on the fact that such evidence is in most cases taken to be collaborator evidence. Upon reaching the crime scene, the first thing would be to seal off the crime scene as far as would be permissible to gather evidence. It is imperative that all evidence is preserved till it is well collected as well as taken into safe custody where the same need to be done. Further to this, I would take on site interviews of all those who would come forward as potential witnesses to determine those who needed to write statements as well as where need be, those who would need protective custody where the suspects were still at large and if considered a danger to the life of such witnesses. After this, I would then summon an ambulance to take the dead body to the morgue awaiting a post mortem so as to gather more evidence. At the laboratory, all the fore mentioned evidence would have to be dusted for finger prints. They would then be labeled differently depending with the outcome of the prints (Lawson, 2003). Safe for this, there would be carrying out of tests on the blood in the lottery and have the same analyzed as would be important in determining whose blood is on the lottery. All these would be important in determining the murderer as well as exonerate any innocent parties.
INTRODUCTION The huge body of the law can be broken down to according to various classifications. Three of the most important distinctions are those between (1) civil law and criminal law, (2) felonies and misdemeanors, and (3) crimes mala in se and mala prohibita (Gaines and Miller, 2013, pg. 69). CIVIL LAW AND CRIMINAL LAW Civil law includes all types of law other than criminal law. It deals with the disputes between individuals, organizations, or between the two, in which compensation is awarded
Chapter Three - Causation in the Criminal Law Chapter three allowed me to discover many new concepts including the legal definition of death, the difference between factual and legal causation, the difference between active and passive euthanasia, what assisted suicide is, and that there can be more than one cause of death. Much of this chapter focused on focused on causation. “ In all cases where consequences are an essential element of the actus reus, it is clear that the Crown must prove that
Introduction Criminal law is a part of law concerned with certain acts (labeled as criminal) that eventually lead to punishment. Although there is no clear-cut definition of what a criminal act is, we can say there are generally two elements to nearly all criminal acts. First, a criminal act is intended to do substantial harm. For example, murder, rape, robbery are considered to be criminal acts. Second, a criminal act involves either criminal intent or guilty mind (mens rea). There are levels in
Well, I have done my project on economic theory of criminal law to understand the economic aspects of criminal law. While doing this project I came across the idea as what should be considered as a crime? What should be criteria for determining a crime? By this I mean to say what the acts which should be punished. Now the other follow up question which comes is that after determining which acts are to be punished, how should we determine their extent? By the above statement I meant what should be
The offence Harry would be charged with is William’s murder. The area of Law that this case is concerned with is criminal law (homicide). The two offences that constitute homicide are murder and manslaughter. The classic definition of murder was set by Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England, 1797). Murder is defined by the Law as causing the death of a human being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. It comprises of 2 elements. These are
It is the purpose of this essay to discuss whether the implementation of strict liability within criminal law system is a necessary means for combating crime, and if there is any justification for its use. Strict liability is the placing of liability upon the defendant(s), regardless of whether or not mens rea is present. This can include instances of negligence, carelessness or accident. There are a number of arguments for and against strict liability, and this essay will identify and explore
hit I’s ear. I’s blood dripped onto I’s coat. The dart continued on to hit an electric cable, setting fire to a fete tent. SUGGESTED ANSWER In advising H of his criminal liability, the possible charges that can be brought against him are under the OFFENCES AGAINST PERSONS ACT 1861 for the injury caused against I, for criminal damage when the blood dripped on to I’s coat and when the tent caught on fire. I’s Injury When the dart that H threw had injured I’s ear. He could be charged
civilization may protest about the laws that control their daily lives and dispute in opposition to government power on principle, civilization could not accurately function without laws and without criminal regulation in particular. For centuries many have seen the principle of criminal law and of the government and the legal system collectively, as essential for the “smooth implementation of society and the conservation of order” (Duff, 2008). This view of criminal law considers it as part of the social
types of law such as civil law, administrative law, case law, criminal law, etc. I am going to focus on the essence of the concept of crime within the variations of law. Although many focus on the main three principles of crime which are the criminal act, mental state and a combination of both, there are five others that have equal importance. Those five are labeled as causation, resulting harm, principles of legality, principles of punishment, and necessary attendant circumstances. The criminal act,
Criminal law is the body of law that relates to crime.” (Wikipedia, 2014) This law encompasses several different aspects of our government and the ways used to regulate them. Maintaining the peace and order of the public is one aspect. Law enforcement officers also try to keep good conduct of the public. Anyone who places the safety of the public in jeopardy, is in violation of this law. Punishment is used in a variety of ways to discipline any person who breaks these laws. There are
undoubtedly complex due to the fact that it is not certain whether it deserves criminal punishment. Whether culpability lies in choosing to act wrongly when having the capacity to do otherwise, or manifests itself in other forms such as carrying out a serious criminal offence regardless of lack of intention, recklessness or knowledge, continues to provoke debate. The arguments for and against the notion that serious criminal offences
Williams in the text book of Criminal Law (Steven and Sons, 2nd Ed, 1983) 27, defines crime as “A crime (of offence) is a legal wrong that can be followed by criminal proceeding which may result in punishment”. 2. Oxford dictionary of Law (6th Ed, 2006) 140 defined Crime as an act (or sometimes failure to act) that is deemed by statute or by the common law to be a public wrong and is therefore punishable by the state in criminal proceeding. Role of the criminal law in
The law is meant to protect citizen and also to let the citizen what you can and cannot do, but not all laws are good and because of technology is changing and advancing fast, the law is slow to revise and keep up with the change. The law is designed to put bad guys in prison and the good guys out of jail, but the law is not perfect and some times the law put good guys in jail and keeps the bad guys out on the street. Criminal law is basically the foundation of the justice system. The law tells
Intoxication may be defined as a state where the intoxicated man is rendered incapable of knowing the nature of his act, or that his act is one which is either wrong or contrary to law. A person may be intoxicated by alcohol or drugs. The simplest argument as to why intoxication may be used as a defence, if a person is in an intoxicated state, and is not aware of what he is doing, there can be no mens-rea and thus he cannot be guilty of a crime. No man should be convicted of a serious offence unless
C. A tippee can satisfy the knowledge requirement of insider trading with imputed knowledge. A tippee has knowledge of a tipper’s breach if the tippee is willfully blind to the breach. Criminal law has long provided that a person cannot avoid liability by hiding from facts that a reasonable person would know. Stone v. United States, 113 F.2d 70, 75 (6th Cir. 1940). Willful blindness is an alternative method of proving that a defendant acted knowingly or willfully. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc