Criminal Justice Process

1089 Words3 Pages

When a crime is committed against another person, then justice must be served to those who committed the crime. In some cases the crimes involve sexual attacks on grown adults while some offenses are against minors. In these examples the underling connection is the committed crimes of sexual abuse or sexual assault on adults and minors. When these crimes are brought before the justice system they are processed and the convicted are given a sentence to carry out but sometimes those sentences may not provide efficient time to produce the required outcome of correcting the individual or may be determined that there is no fixing the convicted disorder. The United States Supreme Court decision to hold a mentally ill, sexually dangerous prison past their assigned release date is right because it protects the public from further dangers, allows for sufficient time for psychiatric processes to work, and imposes stricter punishment for those who are convicted of sexual crimes with a high possibility of recidivism.

Steps are taken by the justice system to protect the public from those who have committed and been convicted of sexually based crimes with incarceration and probation. When these criminals reach the end of their assigned sentence, the prison system had no choice but to allow the inmate to be release but after the 17 May 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of UNITED STATES v. COMSTOCK, it was determined that, “Federal law allows a district to order the civil commitment of a mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoner beyond the date he would other wise be released.” This action allows for the federal system to hold a mentally ill, sexually dangerous prisoner for an indefinite amount of time after the se...

... middle of paper ...

...tric processes to work, and imposes stricter punishment for those who are convicted of sexual crimes with a high possibility of recidivism. The public that did not commit any crimes and only wants to lead the everyday lives desires the right to have a society safe from these criminal.

Works Cited

Center for Sex Offender Management. Recidivism of Sex Offenders. Center for Sex

Offender Management, 1 May 2010. Web. 19 May 2010.

Norman-Eady, Sandra. “Sexual Abuse, Harassment, and Assault.” OLR Research Report.

Connecticut General Assembly. Web. 6 Dec. 2005.

.

United States v. Comstock. 18 U.S.C. 4248. Supreme Court of the US. 2010. Legal

Information Inst., Cornell U Law School, n.d. Web. 19 May 2010.

.

Open Document