Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between ownerships and sense of self
The relationship between ownerships and sense of self
The relationship between ownerships and sense of self
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Whether one owns something or not, seriously affects how they will treat it. However, it is also argued that moral behavior reflects how one handles things such as, property or responsibilities. Not only does owning property or moral behavior affect property, owning property also says something about the person themselves. So much goes into owning and buying property such as the emotional pride and responsibility one feels that comes with it. Though there is empowerment in ownership the individual must show responsibility to pay for it or they will find themselves in debt. Psychologically, ownership affects people on a very emotional scale, from how they treat their property, to an obsession they may develop because of their property, to even how people target certain owners because of their wealth.
In David Boaz’s “defining an ownership society” he quotes Aristotle “what belongs in common to the most people is accorded the least care; they take thought for their own things above all and less about things common, or on so much falls to each individually” (Boaz 329). If a person owns something he is more inclined to take care of it especially if the condition of the product varies the amount of money the person will receive later on. Ownership of a house for instance, thrusts onto a person enormous responsibility. Though the task is stressful it is manageable. As one begins to juggle with the bills and the maintenance of the land they will begin to experience a sense of pride in their home. Boaz uses the axiom “A man’s home is his castle” (Boaz 330). Chosen to express the pride, an individual feels and the sense of immunity one feels from the government inside their home. With the government owning all of one product (an apartme...
... middle of paper ...
...se, a sense of pride envelopes them as they take on what belongs to them. Debt can also occur because of ownership. If a person does not know their limits or know some sort of restraint, they will be caught in an obsession for getting the new and improved or be completely overwhelmed in massive debt. Nevertheless, if not treated cautiously or with a plan of some sort they will find themselves in deep trouble.
Works Cited
Boaz, David. “Defining an Ownership Society”. McDonald 332-333.
Breen, Steve. “Editorial Cartoons”. McDonald 334-335.
Dugas, Christine. “Debt Smothers Young Americans”. McDonald 336-339.
“Identifying Products with Buyers in Magazines Advertisements: Rolex, John Deere, and Fair Instant Coffee ”. McDonald 340-343.
Klein, Naomi. “Disowned by the Ownership Society”. McDonald 332-333.
McDonald, James C, Ed. The Reader. New York: Longman, 2009.
It is one sad existence, to live and die, without discovering, what could have been. The question is often asked, what is the meaning of life? Or even, what is the purpose? There is no clear answer, and yet there is a search in every moment, every breath, and every corner, for a minute hint. In a societal setting, identity is merely determined by the amount of tangible things owned. Society places the ideology on individuals that those who own the most tangible things are above others. An individual can trump all those societal values by owning the self. This brings equality to all, and levels the playing field. This has been true throughout history, however behind all of this, there are individuals learning to conquer themselves. It begs the question, what defines a person, the physical or the metaphysical? There is obviously a compelling relationship between ownership and the sense of self or identity. But, is it ownership that determines the sense of self or is it perhaps, that the sense of self determines ownership. The
To words meaning two different things have a way of relating to one another to create something new? Many things can be made to describe two simple words like ownership and identity. Ownership can be both tangible and intangible. When looking at how ownership relates to identity, people tend to look at aesthetic instead of how ownership builds moral character that leads to identity.
It could be assumed that having is the normal orientation in which people live their life by in the modern societies of Europe or North America. Erich Fromm stated, "To acquire, to own, and to make a profit are the sacred and unalienable rights of the individual in the industrial society" (From 1976:57). Fromm is clearly explaining that to have and to own is the dominant norm and having is related to an individual. Being individualistic is inherent to having because only one can have ownership. If having is shared, it loses its individualistic characteristic. The having orientation is the belief that to be fulfilled in life is sole ownership over a physical object(s) or in-tangibles such as ideas, thoughts or in some cases people. To further explain, the having orientation of physical property, ownership over objects is the ability to hold, possess, and be in control of. Ownership of intangibles is more an abs...
Private property gives individuals full responsibility for their actions concerning their private properties. To most nations around the world, private property is seen as a privilege to have because it is a freedom, such as privacy is a privilege or freedom. One has complete control over a personal belonging. Private property is having the right to do whatever one wants with what he or she owns. President Calvin Coolidge has been quoted as saying, “Ultimately, property rights and personal rights are the same thing.” meaning that having the right to one’s own property is a personal right and privilege one has gained in the quest for universal human rights. Private property owners have the right to do whatever they want with the land and rent out properties or resources. No legislation can tell an individual the actions he...
When compared to countries with a lower amount of national debt, such as the United Kingdom and Sweden, America seems to be built on a foundation of materialism. American materialism influences its society to believe that the more things someone owns, the happier she will be. Many Americans insist on ownership of goods and services, despite how expensive some may be. Even if an individual lacks the necessary funds to afford said goods, however, she can still purchase them by using credit. Credit is money that a bank or business will allow a person to use, provided she reimburses them in the future. The existence of credit encourages people to spend more than they can afford to, ultimately rendering the borrowers slave to the lenders. Abusing credit results in debt, which is a problem that plagues almost every American through most, if not all, of their life. Bad credit and debt are among the worst of problems in America because it contributes towards a progressively unstable state in the economy and prevents many Americans from fulfilling their financial dreams.
While hoarding ranges from mild to severe, only the worst cases make it into the news. After viewing pictures of such homes, one wonders why no one intervened to throw a few things out. Where is the logic in keeping so many things that they start to overpower you and trap you inside your home? Hoarders however, lack the ability to simply throw away a possession. The motivation behind retaining such an encumbrance of items lies in the fear of wasting and losing important information. Hoarders attach emotional meanings to each item, giving it personal and special characteristics.
“Proper society did not think about making money, only about spending it.”, said Barbara W. Tuchman. This quote shows our real world, and the people that spend money, but they forget about the value of money. Nowadays people want more that they have. They forget how many things they have, and how much money they spend. Most people when they see other people having something better, and in that moment they want to have it also. Also, people forget how hard they got that money, but how easily and quickly they spend it. In the article “The treadmill of consumption” by Roberts, he says that people are willing to go into debt to buy certain products and brands. That is right that people can do crazy things to buy certain goods.
Let us first speak of master and slave, looking to the needs of practical life and also seeking to attain some better theory of their relation than exists at present. Property is a part of the household, and the art of acquiring property is a part of the art of managing the household; for no man can live well, or indeed live at all, unless he be provided with necessaries. And so, in the arrangement of the family, a slave is a living possession, and property a of such instruments; and the slave is himself an instrument which takes precedence of all other instruments. The master is only the master of the slave; he does not belong to him, whereas the slave is not only the slave of his master, but wholly belongs to him.
Speaking on Wealth, Lady Philosophy says, “wealth cannot make a man free of want and self-sufficient, though this was the very promise we saw it offering” (83). Moreover, Philosophy points out that the gathering of wealth does not stop people from taking that wealth away (83). Indeed, by its very nature, wealth seems contradictory. If we collect wealth, we believe we will be self-sufficient and free of want, so we hoard it; But “being miserly always makes men hated” (65). In its acquisition, wealth takes away from others, as it is a limited thing, and only brings hatred and paranoia to those who gather it. “[I]t is only when money is transferred to others in the exercise of liberality and ceases to be possessed that it becomes valuable” (65). The acquisition of wealth, then, is folly and can never grant true happiness.
Buying and owning your home is part of the American dream. Although the dream itself has since changed, the home still remains the main focal point. Today owning a home doesn’t necessarily mean a house. People now buy duplexes, cooperative apartments, and condominiums. For some families it could take up to a couple of generations before it’s able to have the capabilities of buying a home. To many people it means a certain achievement that only comes after years of hard work. It is a life altering decision and one of the most important someone can make in their lifetime. The reasons behind the actual purchase could vary. Before anything is done, people must understand that it’s an extraneous process and it is a long term project.
“Magazine Ads of the 50s through the 80s.” BlogSpot, N.p. 8 August 2008. Web. 4 October 2009.
While some extremists do claim to neither own nor desire any material possessions, humans usually tend to feel the need to have many. The need for material wealth has to do with the need to show off one’s accomplishments. In other words, when a person has lots of material wealth, it usually means that he or she has an important job position that pays well enough for he or she to afford these items. For example, a dishwasher at a fast food restaurant could not afford a flashy sports car while a lawyer or doctor could probably afford a couple of them. Owning material possessions basically makes people feel good about themselves because it gives them a way to compare their accomplishments with others.
The idea that everyone’s ideal lives are the same is a farce. Individuals create different worlds for themselves to live in thus generating situations with different solutions. These solutions drive them to reach their own specific goals and dreams to attain the ideal life. As they accomplish these feats, their impression left behind to create a reputation of their character. For an everyday use, one of those impressions left behind by the ability to handle debt. It is impossible to live debt-free; most borrowers cannot pay cash for homes or their children 's college
...wo influences: “scarcity and socialization hypotheses”. The scarcity theory explains how "an individual's priorities reflect one's socioeconomic environment: one places the greatest subjective value on those things that are in relatively short supply" (1990, p.68). Thus, people who are less economically advanced focus a greater importance on material acquisition then the more affluent people. The socialization hypothesis explains that "one's basic values reflect the conditions that prevailed during one's pre adult years" (1990, p.68), and these values are persistently stable over a long period of time. Consequently, the people whom experienced a lack of possessions in previous years are more likely to develop an obsessive desire for material goods, while people who originated from wealthy families may focus on personal fulfillment at the expense of higher incomes.
Advertisements can be many types and each of them carries different impacts on different target. The latest study through a survey conducted in 2009 on the consumer behavior to different types of advertisements for products including Television, Online and Magazines, revealed that advertisements have modified the consumer behavior in such a ways that they only go for brand favorability despite of ad awareness in every type of media. Surveys show that magazine advertisements provide great impact on purchasing behavior of consumers. Mostly people go for purchasing according to the product value shown in advertisements despite of cost of the product as they spend a lot more than the actual value only due to the influence of advertisements (Rai,