Creative Leadership: Methodology and Philosophy of Science

1263 Words3 Pages

Methodology & Philosophy of Science
In this chapter I discuss the research methods suitable for the study and what is useful for it to use in response for the problem statement which is directed towards the creative leaders in companies. Furthermore, in this chapter I present the methods which I used to find out needed information for the project. Thus, this part specifies the methods of research which I used, data collection and analysis of gathered data.
Philosophy of Science
All people in the world culture, appearence, behaviour mostly depends on nationality, country. Hence, view on the world and how they perceive it is different. As we all have different lifes, different destinies, so many things we create our own truth, and we perceives surroundings in a different way.
I, as group of one person, am subjectivist believe that everybody learn and take knowledge from their experience, what kind of life they live and also how they interpretate the information which they read, heard, or etc. I acknowledge multiple truths and take every person opinion into account. Everybody have their opinion about everything, so I not judge for that others opinion is different from mine, I just accept it. Hence, everybody perceives the world differently, if it is in my interview or in the secondary data that I collect.
What is more, subjectivism is an epistemological (theory of knowledge) theory, how everybody can achieve it. As I mention before subjectivism is that every person the knowledge which they gain starts with they private feelings, emotions, ideas and etc. For this reason, everybody gain different understanding about the world and also social life. Moreover, the same we can apply and for the companies, because as every individual have ...

... middle of paper ...

...ges. First advantage would be that I have saved some time. Second advantage – that person who I wanted to interview about creative leadership and also about company in which he/she works did not need to plan our meeting, he/she was able to answer into my questions when he/she wants. Of course, the interviewee has smaller chance of a spontaneous answer to the question, because he/she has more time to think about the answer. One of the disadvantages would be that I cannot get enough information, which can be suitable for me. Because when you talk with person then can come up with more questions and for this reason you know more. One more distadvantage is that the interviewer, in this case I, might have to wait for days or weeks before the interviewee answer the questions. This also leads to the risk that the person who has to answer the questions may forget to reply.

Open Document