Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of medieval punishments
The nature of medieval punishments
The nature of medieval punishments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of medieval punishments
Torture is a gruesome act of violence. In olden times, torture was used in Greek and Roman societies, as well as the twelfth-century Europe as a means for “truth” extraction and display of power. However, if torture was internationally condemned and abolished, with the special emphasis put on the improvements of human rights, the questions about its practice in the modern world remains unanswered. Historically torture has served for public penance using explicit instruments, places and the end result for some – execution.
Originally, public penance was used to set an example of what happens when someone breaks the law or being unruly. It was also used to embarrass or humiliate someone in a public setting for all to see. In some sort or form, the victim had to walk around town doing or wearing something to mark what they was being punished for. If a woman was misbehaving or acting out of character, the husband would put “The Brank” on her. The Brank is a type of device used to humiliate women who broke the public order through gossip or other means. It was a cage type device that went around her head and into her mouth and if the woman tried to speak, it would pierce her tongue. Coffin torture was also a very cruel device where the victim was locked for hours or longer. (Coffin)
From the dawn of time, our history has been darkened by unspeakable deeds of punishment, many of them carried out by earnest people with righteous intentions. Some of the foulest tortures have been inflicted in the name of religion. Some were stoned to death; others were thrown over cliffs or beaten into oblivion in various ways. The less fortunate might be torn apart by wild beasts, pitched into cauldrons of boiling oil, burned alive ins...
... middle of paper ...
... swifter death.
In conclusion, torture was a very cruel and gruesome act. From extracting confessions, to execution. The pain was unbearable and a lot of blood was shed. Historically torture has served for public penance using explicit instruments, places and the end result or some – execution.
Works Cited
“Coffin Torture”. Medieval Times and Castles. 2013. Web. 15 Nov 2013. http://www.medievality.com/coffin-torture.html.
“The Poor Law of 1601”. History. 2013. Web. 20 Nov 2013. http://prison102.tripod.com/history.html
“The Rack Torture”. Medieval Times and Castles. 2013. Web. 15 Nov 2013. http://www.medievality.com/the-rack-torture.html
“The Virgin of Nuremberg”. Medieval Times and Castles. 2013. Web. 15 Nov 2013. http://www.medievality.com/maiden-nuremberg.html
McIlwain, John. “Dungeons & Torture”. Pages 3, 11, 13, 14. Andover: Pitkin, 1998. Print.
Who wouldn’t have agreed? Yes, torture is cruel but it is less cruel than the substitute in many positions. Killing Hitler wouldn’t have revived his millions of victims nor would it have ended war. But torture in this predicament is planned to bring no one back but to keep faultless people from being sent off. Of course mass murdering is far more barbaric than torture. The most influential argument against using torture as a penalty or to get an acknowledgment is that such practices ignore the rights of the particulars. Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” discusses both sides of being with and being against torture. This essay gets readers thinking a lot about the scenarios Levin mentioned that torture is justified. Though using pathos, he doesn’t achieve the argument as well as he should because of the absence of good judgment and reasoning. In addition to emotional appeal, the author tries to make you think twice about your take on
Abraham Lincoln, one of the most revered presidents of our country, once expressed “I have always found that mercy bears richer fruits than strict justice.” Throughout history, many men have tried to teach their people by punishment. From the times of ancient Egypt, to the Dark Ages of Europe, even up to the times of colonial America, persecution, humiliation, and torture have been used to enforce the principles of righteousness. But God has seemingly different ideas. From the very beginning, God has been teaching his children on Earth by showing them mercy instead of giving them misery. This theme is exemplified in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter as Hester and Dimmesdale suffer
The Line Between Right and Wrong Draws Thin; Torture in Modern America and how it is reflected in The Crucible
Humanity is complex, to say the least. We are capable of committing acts that can either be benevolent and selfless, or sickeningly heinous. One of the most renowned shows of cruelty at the hands of people are the various punishments dealt out by the Puritans. Arriving in the Northeast, their “purer” form of Catholicism significantly shaped the lives of Americans in the 17th and 18th centuries. To control their communities they used unjust and unnecessary means, all justified by their deluded religion.
At the beginning of the era, punishments were decided by individuals or their families. This led to punishments were the quantity and quality did not match the significance of the crimes committed. Eventually, proportionate punishment was created, and left to the community, or whoever enforced the law. The reason for their extreme punishments, like execution or banishment on people was because they thought it would make other people refrain from breaking the law. However, studies have been shown that making punishments very harsh did not help much at all, if any (“Punishment”). Some of the most common severe punishments included hanging, burning, the pillory, whipping, branding, starvation in front of the public, and cutting off parts of the body. They also used items such as the scold’s bridle, which was an iron muzzle placed over the head and had a metal piece that stuck in the person’s mouth. The drunkard’s cloak was a type of pillory used on people who became drunk. Overall, most punishments that did not involve anything too serious were normally shameful to the criminal by placing them in front of the public. Some of the minor punishments included being carried in a cart through the streets, and riding backwards on a horse. The pillory was probably the most used prop for punishment, because it varied in intensity, such as getting the criminals ears nailed to the pillory itself. In that time period, they had specific punishments for certain offences. Some of these specifics included stealing anything over 5 pence led to being hanged. Also, the punishment for poaching varied based on the time of day. “Poaching at night resulted in the punishment by death, whereas poaching during the day time did not” (Alchin). Another major form of punishment used was imprisonment. At that time, prisons were very unsanitary and many diseases were
Capital punishment and torture are often looked down on in today’s societies because they are viewed as cruel and unconstitutional, but perhaps they would help in more ways then we would like to admit. They can be beneficial in many ways such as encouragement to be truthful, encouragement to live by the laws, and as a source of punishment. Capital punishment and torture are thought to be too painful, and the person doing the punishment is also committing a crime.
Torture is the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting, defenseless person. Torture in any form is used to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure.
The Web. 15 May 2014. The "Jihad Time Line." Crucifixion: The Muslim Revenge. N.p., n.d. Web.
Until there is a credible way to determine whether or not torture is in fact effective, I pass judgment that the practice should be discontinued. The question as to if the torture policy is a human rights violation or if it holds crucial necessity, is not answered in the essay. Applebaum explores the reality that torture possesses negative implications on the inflictor. After presented with the compelling stance and evidence, Applebaum raises the interesting question as to why so much of society believes that torture is successful. I agree that the torture policy is wrong, a point emphasized by Applebaum, contrary to the popular attitude surrounding the topic.
What would be going through you mind if you were punished by being whipped, hung, burned to death, or starved during the Elizabethan Era? During the Elizabethan Era, there were different types of crimes committed and punishments faced. This paper will explain to readers the significance of the crimes and punishments .
Travelling around the world, this paper presents the various religious perspectives evidenced in recent actions taken regarding the death penalty.
Zacharia, Sophie1. "Death By Stoning: The Uncertain Fate Of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani." Amicus Journal 26 (2011): 21-24. OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson). Web. 22 Mar. 2014.
In conclusion, the convention against torture, has brought many people together, and has informed many people of the horrible tortures which go on everywhere from the US to Syria. It has tried to set fine lines which prohibit torture under all circumstances. However, since there is no governing body over countries, it remains difficult to enforce the human right standards sought after by the Convention against torture. The convention has therefore done a good job at identifying the torturers. This has in turn lessened the amount of those persecuted. It will remain a gradual process to eliminate torture from all countries, but nevertheless a necessity, in the quest for universal human rights. Torture will continue until all countries decide for themselves, and not from a third party convention that freedom from torture is a human right everyone deserves.
In the early modern era in Europe, public executions were the primary punishment given to members of society who were involved in criminal behavior. This form of punishment served to showcase the absolute power of the state, King and church to take away the life of any citizen who disrupts peace. It was a way to make the criminal justice system visible and effective in an era when the criminal justice system was in its beginning stages of demonstrating orderliness (Spierenburg). More specifically, it was a relatively straightforward and psychological way to evoke deterrence. The potential of gruesome violence, public persecution and religious betrayal were tools thought to be strong enough to make public executions a successful form of deterrence because within the community, social bonds and religion were the foundation of everyday life.... ...
Torture is the process of inflicting pain upon other people in order to force them to say something against their own will. The word “torture” comes from the Latin word “torquere,” which means to twist. Torture can not only be psychologically but mentally painful. Before the Enlightenment, it was perfectly legal to torture individuals but nowadays, it is illegal to torture anyone under any circumstances. In this essay, I will demonstrate why torture should never acceptable, not matter the condition.