Since the 1980s there has been an increased awareness by organisations regarding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The perception in the current world of business is that maximisation of profits is one of the organisational goals and that for a business to grow other goals need to be fulfilled (Werther and Chandler 2010). One of them is for the organisation in question to adopt a Corporate Social Responsibility agenda. Engaging in socially responsible endeavours for an organization has proved to be crucial for sustainability and success. This involvement should depict market-oriented responsible actions. These responsible behaviours of an organisation towards the community are in other words the Corporate Social Responsibility actions. The community in this respect includes, but not limited to, employees and to some extent the shareholders and other members of the society. Organisations approach adoption of CSR in different ways and focus on different stakeholders depending on the market goal they want to achieve or priority levels. This paper will look into the advantages and disadvantages for organisations to employ socially responsible Human Resource practices, with a prime focus on American Apparel as an example.
CSR on HR policies
The success of an organization is highly pegged on the human resources involved in production or service delivery. People run these organizations in whichever capacity and their total productivity drives the organization forward. There is need therefore to ensure that each member of staff produces the highest they can at any particular time. This is however impossible when these employees are not well motivated. Motivation is a key concern and contributing factor towards an employee’s level ...
... middle of paper ...
...porate Social Responsibility is not an easy issue and it causes extensive debates and controversy. Businesses are more than ever required to act according to stakeholders’ expectations some of them being the employees. The Human Resource practices of an organisation need to capture some form of CSR where welfare issues of workers are taken care of. This can be through relatively higher pay, offer supportive services e.g. medical care among others as the case is with American Apparel. It is however an issue or endeavour that chokes a company’s resources and the management needs to think through it and plan their CSR strategy well in order to reap long term benefits from such actions. Through the case of American Apparel, it is clear to see that if well formulated and implemented, CSR on Human Resource practices will amount to sustainable success of an organisation.
Having employees with a high level of motivation is what the company wants to see in them because it means that they are more likely to handle the pressure of the job as well as provide quality service to the customer, making the customers return. Making sure that the employees stay motivated is important because it is what is beneficial to the company as well as making the employee’s time working more satisfying. Though being motivated is a good characteristic to have, it can be hard with keeping up the fast pace to many customers while providing quality service to each of them. Similarly, dealing with some customers can be difficult which leads to an employee feeling unmotivated. After all, each employee must remain sincere to their customers at all times. This is a reason why the job can be so stressful and what can cause the employees to be unmotivated to conti...
An inadequately motivated employee can be very costly to the organization. Where the quality and quantity of work produced by the employee is just enough not to be fired. Job satisfaction and commitment is lacking and the employee is not motivated to work. This performance can drastically affect the bottom line of the organization whether it be financial gain or otherwise. With the changing nature of work, organizations today tend to be much flatter and slimmer than they were 20 years ago (McGreevy Malcolm, 2003). To manage and adapt to the changes the organization must have committed employees to be able to not only cope but to excel and succeed.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
Company X is a plastic injection molding manufacturer located in Highland, Michigan. The company had started in 2005 and survived the hard economic times. Company X started out by first doing applique and added 6 months ago injection molding. There are two owners, and there are less than 75 employees. Every company small or large should take social responsibility.
The term Corporate Social Responsibility refers to a company’s responsibility to provide a benefit to the society the company affects. Corporate social responsibility incorporates dimensions of corporate responsibility, and corporate policy which include a company’s policy to hire minority or disabled workers, or taking a stance on social and political issues that benefit the community. The social portion of corporate social responsibility includes corporate charitable business contributions and expands on this common social business practice by invoking corporate social initiatives. For example, as a policy, Wal-Mart grocery store managers purchase as much produce and goods from local farmers and distributors they can as opposed to relying on national food distributors. This example of a corporate social initiative provides a greater benefit to the economy of the society surrounding Wal-Mart stores than if Wal-Mart made only charitable contributions to a food bank within the local area. Environmental responsibility is a business’s responsibility to decrease its carbon footprint and produce green products. The trend to produce green products has come into effect since global warming has become a greater concern in the world over the past decade. Reducing the carbon footprint and making green products may increase a company’s cost, but the company can charge more for its products and services to offset the increased cost. Nickels, J. McHugh, and S. McHugh give an example of the Ciba Specialty Chemicals Company, a Swiss textile dye manufacturer who charges more for its dyes than other dye companies because Ciba’s dyes “require less salt than traditional dyes”, and are therefore more expensive to produce (Nickels, J McHugh, S...
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
Most of the research was conducted using the descriptive Corporate Social Responsibility approach, this research mainly focused on whether CSR was incorporated in the football industry. If it is, then how it is carried out? This essay will include; reasons for football clubs to adopt CSR policies, the benefits gained by football clubs when adopting CSR and how is CSR practiced; how do football cubs act socially responsible.
The corporate social responsibility is a commitment by a business to contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life for employees and their families’ as-well as contributing to the society. Walmart is a well-known company that offers customers the items they want and need at a low cost, with nearly 4,000 stores in the United States. According to the Fortune 500, Walmart was ranked number 1 in 2015. Just like any other superstore Walmart needs to continue the use of social responsibility by recreating a relationship between business and the community especially if they want to dominate the competition in 2016. The use of sustainability, strategic philanthropy, causing market, shared values, stakeholders and global perspective will help readers understand the purpose of social responsibilities in the corporate world.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes one’s duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each, as well as how these theories can be used to further strengthen and sustain worker motivation....
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be defined as, “the broad array of strategies and operating practices that a company develops in its efforts to deal with and create relationships with its numerous stakeholders and the natural environment” (Waddock as cited by Lindgreen and Swaen, 2013). It has gained popularity in the space of Human Resource Management. CIPD (2010) argues that, “HR plays a role in ethical employment practices which is the core of CSR, and beyond that, it is the best department to impart organizational culture and values which directly influence CSR” (Ballinger, Gilfford and Miller, 2013). Hence, it might be debated whether CSR should be a requirement or voluntary cause for businenesses, but the purpose
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
Motivation is the force that transforms and uplifts people to be productive and perform in their jobs. Maximizing employee’s motivation is a necessary and vital to successfully accomplish the organization’s targets and objectives. However, this is a considerable challenge to any organizations managers, due to the complexity of motivation and the fact that, there is no ready made solution or an answer to what motivates people to work well (Mullins,2002).
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...