Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical and legal responsibilities in the construction industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leading Property Companies in Hong Kong, such as San Hung Kai Properties and Henderson Land Development Comapny Ltd are one of the sectors that are most influencing and profitable in this city. Holding a majority of lands, buildings and much capital, these firms have been being a major concern of the public in regard of their influence on the society. In this essay, differnet views on the coporate social responsibility (CSR) are examinated and justified using the shareholders theory, stakeholders theory and Peter Drucker's view on CSR. Background Information of Leading Property Companies In general, the term leading property companies are often referred to the three largest proerty developers in Hong Kong, the San Hung Kai Properties (San Hung Kai) and Henderson Land Development Comapny Ltd (Henderson) and Chueng Kong Properties (Chueng Kong), which have seemingly achieved a dominance in both the property market and wealth rank among local enterprises. To be detail, San Hung Kai possess about 41.9 million undeveloped total gross floor area and 44 million developed or developing investment properties, while the those of Henderson are 19.8 million and 2.4 million. On the other hand, Cheung Kong holds 0.3 million developed investment propeties and unknown amount of undeveloped land. These three firms have made profits of HKD 11.5 billion, 8.94 billion and 26.478 billion respectively. Companies' Actions Regarding CSR Along with the huge profit gained recently, these firms have also recognized the recent trend of coporate social responsbility, and have taken related actions. For instance, San Hung Kai engages actively in green buildings, social well-being of its employees and sustaniable development. Specifically, it has esta... ... middle of paper ... ...) Limited, “Annual Report 2013”, Cheung Kong.com. Retrieved from http://www.ckh.com.hk/uploaded_files/news/609_e_content.pdf Henderson Land Development Company Limited, “Corporate Social Responsbility”, hld.com. Retrieved from http://www.hld.com/tc/csr/csrlanding.shtml Judd F.Sneirson, “Doing Well By Doing Good: Leveraging Due Care for Better, More Socially Responsible Corporate Decisionmaking”, Corporate Governance Review, 3 October 1970. Vol 3, 438. Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970 Peter Drucker, “A New Look at Corporate Social Responsibility”, McKinsey Quarterly, 1984. Sung Hung Kai Properties, “Corporate Social Responsbility”, Sung Hung Kai Properties.com. Retrieved from http://www.shkp.com/en-US/Pages/corporate-social-responsibility-overview
...Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate’, Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 9-18.
Mackey, J. (2005, October). Rethinking the social responsibility of business. Journal of Reason, 10, 15-17.
To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? So before we go into greater detail on the different perspectives related to social responsibility, one might question the meaning of social responsibility. It is generally agreed that social responsibility is defined as the business obligation to make decisions that benefit society.... ...
Wee, Heesun. “Corporate Ethics: Right Makes Might.” Business Week Online. Ed. Douglas Harbrecht. 11 Apr. 2002. 3 Mar. 2005.
Wee, H., April 11, 2002 “Corporate Ethics: Right Makes Might.” Bloomberg Businessweek, [Online] available from:
Friedman, Milton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. September 13.
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to make Profit. New York Times
The article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” is written by a famous economist Milton Friedman. Friedman in this article implies that shareholders are the main drivers of the corporations and he believes that it is to them corporations must be socially responsible to. The goal of any corporation is to maximize profits and return the portion of these profits to shareholders for investing in the corporation. The shareholders can themselves decide which social causes to take part in rather than assigning a corporate executive to decide on their behalf. Friedman argues that a corporation must have no social responsibility to society because its only concern is the increase profits for itself and its shareholders.
Friedman, M., (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In W.
It seems obvious that large corporations have a tendency to ignore the negative effects of their actions in favor of profit. This example, although sensationalized, still says to me that with power comes responsibility. It affirmed my belief that a corporation’s goal cannot be just to provide profit to shareholders, but there must also be an element of social responsibility.
Friedman, M. “A Friedman Doctrine – The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase Its Profits”, The New York Times Publications, September 13, 1970
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its
Corporate Social Responsibility is an organisation’s obligation to serve the company’s own interest and the one’s of the society. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility has a definition of a concept where the companies integrate social and the environmental concerns into their own business operation and also on a basis of voluntary with their interactions they have with the stakeholders. Corporate Social Resp...