Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why there should be a term limit in congress
Why congress needs term limits
Argumentative essay on congress term limits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why there should be a term limit in congress
Politicians and citizens alike have fervently debated congressional term limits for years; the issue has resulted in numerous proposals for legislation, however, few have attracted the support of the government or the people. Still, the welfare of the nation thirsts for this reform, for it will bring about progress, efficiency, and increased dedication to the American people. The legislative branch is where ideas are created and put into action. By imposing term limits, the American people can make sure that they are relying on only the most intellectually elite, selfless, and responsible leaders to cultivate and foster these ideas. New people must be given a chance to inject progressive ideas and challenge the ideals of a venal legislation. These necessities can be delivered most promptly and efficiently through the implementation of congressional term limits. Term restrictions will have the power to give Congress renewed and more effective members. By implementing congressional term limits, the government is ensured to have a legislative branch that works towards maintaining the founding fathers’ visions. The founding fathers manipulated the norms of government to make it so that their creation responded to the people, not the other way around; due to their accomplishments and reliability, it is most beneficial that we adhere to their original plans. Still, like all human beings, they failed to see how much society would alter in the centuries to come. Today’s government has obviously digressed from their road because the founders were unable to enforce such foreseeing restrictions. In order to put them back on track, it is essential that they institute the regulations that were needed so long ago. The Founding Fathers never... ... middle of paper ... ...s Can Only Make Congress Worse." The New York Times. N.p., 10 Sept. 1992. Web. 14 Nov. 2013. Saad, Lydia. "Americans Call for Term Limits, End to Electoral College." Americans Call for Term Limits, End to Electoral College. N.p., 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 14 Nov. 2013. . Seelye,, Katharine Q. "Gingrich Explores New Way To Limit Terms in Congress." The New York Times. The New York Times, 16 Feb. 1995. Web. 14 Nov. 2013. . Seelye, Katherine Q. "THE 104TH CONGRESS: TERM LIMITS; House Republicans Hit a Snag Over the Extent of Term Limits." The New York Times. N.p., 12 Jan. 1995. Web. 14 Nov. 2013. .
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
The United State’s Constitution, the shortest written Constitution in the world, only has twenty-seven amendments, and now it is time to add another. The power of a presidential line-item veto was denied to the Clinton Administration in 1998, but with this last Congress being the least productive Congress ever, it is time to re-think the power distribution in the legislative process. In Congress, on average, only 10% of the bills proposed make their way through, and ever reach the President’s desk. In this modern day and age a bill, on average, is 3,105 words. When Congress was first created the idea was that each proposed legislation would be contained in one bill, now bills are comprised of various provisions. Which is why the power of the line-item veto would be beneficial to expand presidential authority. This line-item veto authority is the ability to cross out certain provisions while still being able to sign in to law the entire bill. This would be beneficial to the United States government, as an amendment that would allow the president to cut out unnecessary spending to in turn lower the national deficit. The United States government needs to pass an amendment to allow Presidents to use the line item veto.
... Web. The Web. The Web. 27 Apr. 2014.
The 22nd Amendment creates a lame duck and which stops abuse of power3. Presidents in their second term have been seen to usually suffer diminished power, particularly after the second midterm elections. This diminish of power creates a lame duck. The president becoming a lame duck, stops him from being able abuse of power. The 22nd Amendment also stops the country from being a monarchy. US. Senators and Congressmen don’t have term limits because their voices are balanced by opposing parties in their chambers, the presidency is different. The president has no similar
Mike Lee, The Forth Worth Star-Telegram. Texas Governor should have term limit. Fort Worth, 01 September 2010.
This amendment sets term limits to the office of the president. Setting a term limit mitigates the natural function of elections. The people should have the power to determine if a politician has served enough terms as President. If the people feel this is the case. They could simple vote that politician out of office. Thus the impact of this amendment is to limit the sovereignty and choice of the people. This is in direct conflict with our founding principles. I contend that the people should retain the sovereignty to decide when a politician is not suitable for the office of President through voting. To undermine this freedom and sovereignty of the people is to allow
Congressional terms have no limits. Controversy exists between those who think the terms should be limited and those who believe that terms should remain unlimited. The group that wants to limit the terms argues that the change will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions being made for self-interest. Those who oppose term limits believe that we would sacrifice both the stability and experience held by veteran politicians. They also point out that our election process allows the voter to limit terms, at their discretion. While experience and stability are important considerations, congressional terms should be limited to a maximum of two.
Norman Ornstein is regarded as one of our nation's foremost experts on Congress. Mr. Ornstein received a Ph.D.. from the University of Michigan, he writes for the NewYork Times, USA Today, Washington Post, and he has a regular column in Roll Call newspaper called 'Congress Inside Out';. Mr. Ornstein is also an election analyst for CBS and appears frequently on television shows including the Today Show, Nightline and the Mac Neil/Lehre News Hour where he has been a consultant and contributor for
Silverleib, Alan. “House Rejects Debt Ceiling Increase, 318-97.” CNN Politics. CNN, 31 May 2011. Web. 6 June 2011. .
Staff Reports, White House 2000 / Republicans "John McCain." New York Times 22 Nov. 1999.
Prior to the presidency of Andrew Jackson, the system of appointing officials was under the “ideal of holding office during good behavior”, which led to the holding of positions by aged and incapable politicians who were not properly qualified for the tasks and jobs needed to be carried out. On the other hand, Jackson had appointed officials from all walks of life to promote the equality principles of democracy. Jackson also advocated “rotation in office”, which meant allow as many people serve in office for the shortest possible t...
South University Online. (2013). POL2076: American Government: Week 4: People and Politics—Interest Groups. Retrieved from http://myeclassonline.com
As seen quite often in the Obama administration, legislation gets stuck and lost in Congress due to the polarization of the parties in recent years. In Obama’s case, he has frequently threatened to go around the House and Senate if they could not reach an agreement or would shoot down his plans. Cato’s Pilon points out, however, that the hurdles of Congress are no mistake. Pilot states that the framer’s of the Constitution knew what they were doing, and this was intended to keep the checks and balances as well as accountability to the public (Lyons,
Congress was established to represent the people; to serve a purpose bigger than themselves. The delegates battled with each other all for the greater good. Their responsibility was to facilitate prosperity and to set up a safe and flourishing country for their eager citizens. Similarly, their duty is to serve the constituents and their country. This is done through extensive processes of legislation and investigations of national significance. To get the job done in Congress, it may not always be pretty. Throughout the history of the law-making governmental body, there has been gun-fights, fist-fights, and verbal assaults amongst members. This branch has made decisions that have highly influenced the country varying from such acts as declaring and ending war to establishing Mother's Day. “Higher office is on the minds of many delegates. They may not see their position exclusively as a stepping-stone to a higher office, but many members are clearly ambitious”1 Nearly half of all U.S. presidents served in congress before obtaining their executive position.