Confucian Ideals and Ethic

797 Words2 Pages

Ren and Li The Analects presents ren and li as two major ideals in Confucian ethics. I will define ren as the highest ethical idea, and li will refer to rites, ceremony and acceptable social norms. I argue that by looking at a third interpretation of the relation between li and ren, we can create a meaningful interpretation of the text. Moreover, I will argue that Mozi’s criticism against Confucius’ li is ultimately invalid. First, I will present three existing interpretations of ren and li. Then, I will discuss the Mozi’s objection to li and finish by rejecting this attack. One interpretation holds that ren and li are intelligible independently from one another. This means that one may have ren without li and vice versa. The relationship between them, however, is a causal relationship. For example, suppose my father passes away, I can mourn and show ren, independent of whether I attend a memorial. However, by attending a funeral, this provides a means to exercise ren. In 15.18, Confucius claims, “rightness is put into practice by observing li.” Ultimately, there is a sense in which li provides a means and virtuous cycle for the expression and cultivation of ren. Under this interpretation, ren is seemingly prioritized over li, because ren is cultivated in observing li. This is to say, ren provides the individual with agency in deciding how to best cultivate and express the appropriate attitude in a given situation so long as the appropriate attitude is cultivated. A second interpretation of the relation between ren and li holds that one is cultivates ren when one observes li; ren and li are not independently intelligible. In 12.1, Confucius notes that “the rites…constitute ren,” or in 1.2, Confucius notes that fi... ... middle of paper ... ...argument is that funerary practices deserve some standardization as to ensure the efficacy of the ritual. While it may be right to say that the rites by themselves are not effective, it is not fair to say that Confucius prioritizes li over ren for the sake of li. In all cases, then, Confucius seeks to ensure that the right attitude is observed, even if one must adhere to certain rites. I have demonstrated three interpretations of the relationship between ren and li as they relate to one another. I have shown that while Mozi criticism of Confucius is ultimately a misunderstanding of the relationship between ren and li. This is all to say, ren and li, while they may be interpreted in different ways, the goal is to attain ren – the primary difference is about how to cultivate appropriate attitudes and on what basis one can revise or depart from existing traditions.

Open Document