Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
4 key features of conflict theory
Conflict theory essay
4 key features of conflict theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 4 key features of conflict theory
‘’Conflict is the process of opposition and confrontation that occur in organizations between either individuals or group-occurs when parties exercise power in the pursuit of valued goals or objectives and obstruct the progress of other parties’’ (Wagner and Hollenbeck 2010, p.227) .
Oceanic Bank International Plc(OBI) is one of Nigeria’s foremost financial services institutions. The bank serves customers spread across all tires of government, corporate organisation, small and medium enterprises and individuals. This review is focussed on the issues that relate conflict between marketing and operations functions and the performance on OBI .
A classic example of organisational conflicts is seen in the relationship between marketing or sales and operations or manufacturing (Rotemberg and Saloner,1995) and it was noted by Shapiro(1977) to be majorly caused by a difference in evaluation criteria for the different units.Taking OBI, Nigeria as a case study, the marketing staff are evaluated based on the number of businesses they generate while operations staff are based on how effectively and efficiently they carry out their duties while adhering to the bank’s policies. Other causes of conflict as highlighted by (Mullins 2005) can be linked to differences in perception, Individual attitudes, departmentalisation and specialisation.This can result in different responses in individuals and differing goals.
In this analysis, the effects of conflict in reducing motivation and performance are discussed.The benefits of functional conflict as compared to dysfunctional conflict in OBI are analysed.The importance of communication and resolution approaches are explored. Also suggestions on how conflict can be minimised in the bank are propose...
... middle of paper ...
...and it effect on individuals, group and organisation is important in appreciating the factors that enhance and impede group conflicts and creates ways for addressing dysfunctional behaviours and circumstances that leads to conflict and construct ways of encouraging functional conflict that drive performance and good corporate in OBI.
The use of collaborating approach in handling conflict should be encouraged as this will enhance teamwork in the bank.
The importance of effective co-ordination and communication which can build up team culture and trust in the bank has been highlighted .
The suggestions made in the report, once implemented would be beneficial for the bank.It would minimise or eliminate the intensity of conflict and enhance the performance of the staff and organisation as a whole.
At Wells Fargo, teamwork and sales are important skills needed in order to succeed as a teller. At Wells Fargo, I plan to incorporate a system where each teller gains the skills necessary so that each task runs efficiently. To begin, I will start observing each banker’s, and each teller’s normal routine. I will be listening carefully to the conversations the tellers, and bankers are having with customers. As an observer, I will be taking notes on what the employee’s strengths and weakness are when lobbying to a customer, and working with coworkers. I will continue this process for a week. Once the week is complete, I will have one on one meetings with each employee. After the employee’s one on one meeting is complete, a proposed course of
According to Riaz and Junaid (2010), there are four levels of conflict evaluation: intragroup, intergroup, intrapersonal and interpersonal. Sources of intrapersonal conflict include inappropriate demand on one’s capacity, goal incongruence and mal-assignment. Mal-assignment rises in cases where an employee is allocated a task to which he or she does not have the right skills or knowledge, commitment or aptitude. The employee experiences an overloaded qualitative role resulting to role conflict. The employee is unable to satisfy the specified capacity even if he or she works to his or her capacity leading to quantitative ro...
The textbook definition of conflict is when two or more individuals or concepts appear to be incompatible, and in this case low productivity versus high productivity is the conflict that must be addressed between the employee and manager. Power on the other hand is the capacity to do something either by physical force or strength and in this case the employee perceives that the manager has all the power in this situation. This now becomes a power imbalance or struggle of major proportion as the employee perceives t...
According to the Theorists as groups turn into teams, most conflict happens in the “storming” stage of team development (De Janasz, Dowd & Schneider, 2001). First, one must understand what conflict is. Capozzoli (1999) cites Boulding’s 1962 definition of conflict as “a situation of competition in which the parties are aware of the incompatibility of potential future positions and in which each party wishes to occupy a position which is incompatible with the wishes of the other.” Conflict can be either constructive or destructive to the team and can be created in several ways. Conflict must be analyzed and understood for the team to resolve it.
Conflict as defined by Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary is a competitive or opposing action of incompatibles: antagonistic state or action (as of divergent ideas, interest, or persons), Mental struggle resulting from incompatible or opposing needs, drives, wishes, or external or internal demands. Simply put conflict is the disagreement and disharmony that occurs in groups when differences are expressed regarding ideas, methods, and/ or members (Engleberg, Wynn, and Schuttler, 2003). Conflict among teams or groups develops in many ways. In developing an effective team, members will generally experience the five stages of evolution: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning. The storming and norming stages deal with the process of conflict (storming) and resolution (norming). During the storming stage, exact conflict has not yet been identified and therefore chaos, disorganization, and disputes are apparent. The Norming stage is where conflict is identified and dealt with and resolutio...
Although there is a plethora of possible sources of conflict in any workplace, the ones in this case are rather explicit. These include personal differences, Informal deficiencies’, role incompatibility, environment stress, perceptions, and expectations. Personal differences could be related to personal values, physiognomies, family bonds or ties, and material belongings.
Initially the bank’s core banking system was product oriented, but the need of the hour was to develop a customer oriented system, because the challenge is to build customer loyalty, cross sell, and enhance repeat business.
Differences within the team are the major reason for conflict. This stems from differences in opinion, attitude, beliefs, as well as cultural back grounds and social factors. The Conflict can be positive which is functional and supports or benefits the organization or a person’s main objectives (Reaching Out, 1997). Conflict is viewed as positive when the conflict results in increased involvement form the group, increased cohesion, and positive innovation and creativity. Conflict tends to be positive as well when it leads to better decisions, and solutions to long-term problems.
This model distinguishes six possible sources of conflict that may arise: incompatible goals, differentiation, interdependence, scarce resources, ambiguous rules, and communication problem (McShane and Von Glinow 332-333). Incompatible goals involves that “the goal of one person or department seem to interfere with another person’s or department’s goal” (McShane and Von Glinow 333). Differentiation is described as the “difference among people, departments, and other entities regarding their training, values, beliefs, and experiences” (McShane and Von Glinow 333). Interdependence “occurs where individuals operate interdependently except for reliance on a common source or authority” (McShane and Von Glinow 335). Scarce Resources are a source of conflict when several persons or units require the same recourse to fulfill their goals. Ambiguous Rules occur as a source of conflict because “uncertainty increases the risk that one party intends to interfere with the other party’s goals” (McShane and Von Glinow 335). Communication Problems are a source of conflict “due to the lack of opportunity, ability, or motivation to communicate effectively” (McShane and Von Glinow 333).
Organizations are collections of people that work together and coordinate their actions to achieve a wide variety of goals and for a positive outcome. Conflict is a matter of perception. Managing and resolving conflicts are key factor which group needs to use to be productive. All stages in team development require the ability to negotiate and resolve team conflict. In the beginning stages, it would mostly be the manager negotiating with the employees. In the latter stages of team development, team members to negotiate and resolve conflicts amongst
I agree with the statement above on the basis that communication is the most important thing when it comes to working in unison.
... understand the other side’s point of view. All parties are able to identify areas of agreement and disagreement, creatively explore and evaluate alternatives, and select solutions to which they are all committed. Though collaborating is the only win-win approach preferred to resolving conflicts in many situations, there is time and place for the other styles as they may better meet the needs of the situation.
Quantitative research involves the collection and converting of data into numerical form to enable statistical calculations be made and conclusions drawn. It provides a measure of how people think, feel or behave and uses the statistical analysis to determine the results. However, this measurement results in numbers, or data, being collected, which is then analyzed by using quantitative research methods (Byrne, 2007).
Conflict exists in every organization as a result of incompatible needs, goals, and objectives of two people while aligning to the overall business requirements. Though disagreement is linked with negative impact, the approach has healthy considerations (Leung, 2008). For instance, some conflicts create an avenue for the exchange of ideas and creativity to meet the set organizational purposes. However, damaging disagreement in organizations results in employee dissatisfaction, turnover, and poor services and reduced productivity. The paper establishes different types of interpersonal conflict and key resolution strategies used to address the problem. Human resource managers need to have the capacity to identify different levels of conflicts and the best methods to negate them.
When most people hear that word conflict, they decide instantly if this is something they care to get involved in. Most people rather avoid conflict than get caught up in other people’s drama. Laura Stacks author of conflict in the workplace compares conflict to pain. She argues that pain and conflict has one thing in common; no one likes either. However, someone once said that pain was a gift, because pain is the indicator that God blessed us with so that, we will know when something is wrong and we may need medical attention. If pain is not all bad according to Stacks illustration conflict is not all bad either. According to Porter-O’Grady and Malloch, (2015) it is normal for conflict to occur within various relationships; people will just have to learn to deal with conflict sooner or later. This paper will address the issues surround workplace conflicts and their resolutions.