Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
a research proposal on performance appraisal
a research proposal on performance appraisal
a research proposal on performance appraisal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: a research proposal on performance appraisal
With performance appraisals becoming the new norm, their importance has grown, and they have become a way to evaluate candidates for job promotions and who gets saved during layoffs. Many different factors go into assessing and performing a performance appraisal; the first one is deciding at what level you need to start evaluating for a performance appraisal. The second factor to take into account is how do you measure your appraisal? Do you differentiate by candidate or who does more and how fast they do it? Performance appraisals are used administratively whenever they are the basis for a decision about the employee’s work conditions, including promotions, terminations, and rewards. (Gomez-Mejia, 2012, p.223). Performance appraisals compare work performed against measurable objectives that the employee and supervisor agreed to at the beginning of the appraisal period (smallbusiness.chron.com). If the employee does not meet the objectives as agreed upon, this may have a downstream effect on their salary, chances for advancement, and it could lead to termination. The manager plays a critical role in the administrative process of the performance appraisal. When the manager conducts the performance appraisal, it must be thorough, accurate and performed on a timely basis. In a situation where the employee is terminated due to their appraisal and rating, the business might find itself having to defend its validity. The performance appraisal can be applied to the individual employee or a team/group of employees. Administratively, a performance appraisal for a team should serve as a tool to determine which employee or employees are not pulling their weight in the organization. Team performance appraisals as... ... middle of paper ... ...end up in a legal battle over discrimination. If you follow your criteria and stay within the law, you should be in good standing. References Balkin, D.B., Cardy, R.L., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2012). Managing Human Resources: Upper Saddle River: Preston Employers Association. (2014, March 12). Retrieved March 11, 2014 from The Employers Association People and Performance: www.employersassociation.com Wicks, D., (n.d.) Differences Between Individual & Team Performance Evaluations Retrieved March 13, 2014 from www. smallbusiness.chron.com Gray, C., (n.d.) Team vs. Individual Performance Appraisals. Retrieved on March 13, 2014 from www.smallbusiness.chron.com Heathfield, S. (2013) How Can Managers Improve Performance. Retrieved March 12, 2014 from http://humanresources.about.com/od/performanceappraisal/f/improve-performance- appraisals.htm
Miller, C. E., & Thornton, C. L. (2006). How Accurate Are Your Performance Appraisals? Public Personnel Management, 35(2), 153-162.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
... frequently avoid conducting appraisals because they dislike playing the role of judge. As a result appraisals are conduct annually, for good or evil, and forgot about. Largely the success of an organization depends on the performance of its human resources. To determine the contributions of each individual, it is necessary to have a formal appraisal program with clearly stated objectives. Carefully designed performance standards that are reliable, strategically relevant, and free from either criterion deficiencies or contamination are essential foundations for evaluation. The use of multiple raters is frequently a good idea because different individuals see different facets of an employee's performance. The supervisor, for example, has legitimate authority over an employee and is in a good position to discern whether he or she is contributing to the goals of the organization. Peers and team members, on the other hand, often have an unfiltered view of an employee's work activity, particularly related to cooperation and dependability. As I conclude my paper it is easily evident that ethical differentiating is most important and it should be held with the utmost just distinctions.
Appraisal of performance help in correcting deficiencies and reinforce good performance of employers. There are 3 steps of performance appraisal process:
The good procedure of performance appraisal system in an organisation can completely change the enterprise from the “good effort environment to the results- driven climate”. “ if the company going to survive, let alone prevail, in the competitive climate that all face, performance appraisal, more than any other approach, has the power to generate incredible and sustained change throughout the orgnaisation. More than management development of performance appraisal can focus the attention of stakeholders which is the key for the enterprise to survive. The major culture and serious changes can be driven very easily if the enterprise look at their performance appraisal system”. Cited in Gunnigle et al (2006, p.208).
This report focuses on the Performance Appraisal of Agilent Technologies. Performance appraisal is one of the factors related to an organization’s long-term success. It has the ability to measure how well employees perform and then use the information to ensure that performance meets present standards and improves over time.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
In summary, appraisal forms are the key instruments used to measure performance. Care and attention are required to ensure that the forms include all the necessary components. More importantly, it is important to remember that one size does not fit all and different components are appropriate based on the purposes of the appraisal. (Aguinis, 2009, p. 143)
How much traditional performance methods help in employee development is somewhat unclear for employees as well as organizations. Performance appraisal is about the past, which means how the employee has performed in past period that is being reviewed for a particular performance cycle. They rarely focus on developing the employee’s skills and abilities.
Improving staff efficacy and effectiveness is only possible in light of their performance appraisal (Torabi and Sufodeh 2010). Performance Appraisal does not always increase productivity, it may be biased, not accurate and not accepted by users. Occasionally, performance appraisal system has been linked to increase in dissatisfaction, lack of motivation, resistance especially on the part of the appraiser/employees. This condition is due to other errors in the content of evaluation biases in the process of evaluation, disharmony between employee needs and appraisal goals or the absence of clear and independent dimensions (Grangreio, Caruguti, Sebastiano and Tamimi
The performance method can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of employee at work through performance appraisals
Although performance is a major objective at top organizations, successfully addressing poor performance is also a key focus. Although many employees feel or dread performance appraisals they are directed to enforce clarity with individual employees day-to-day work-load, performance appraisals develops responsibility while making employees accountable for performance expectations, reinforces future career planning, helps the organization with determining training needs, and provides a stem of documentation for legality purposes. Performance management in detail is much broader than many employers, and employees assume and necessitates so much more. Proficient appraisals should represent a summary of on-going dialogue. Focusing only on an annual performance evaluation leads to misrepresentation of the performance management process in its
Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource Education. Vol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22.
Performance appraisal is viewed as important in terms of appraisal being part of the accountability apparatus of the public service. Being able to show that appraisals are carried out and that performance issues are being discussed is considered an important element in presenting information to politicians and the public and provides assurance around accountability for the performance of public organisations. The level of conformance with carrying out PMDS appraisals, for example, and the scores received, are seen as issues of public concern and