Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of globalization has on international business
Business and corporate level strategy
Negative impact of globalization on business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“No one company anywhere in the world is big enough or strong enough to do everything on its own”. – Drucker (1996).
The world is changing: the business operational environment is now characterized by high volatilities and uncertainties than it ever had. Globalization has become the order of the day and a reality to all players both on the domestic and international scene. Those firms that has become oblivious of the global economy are destined to the achieves of business history. Corporate strategist are kept busy constructing and coining new strategies to cope with the changing environment. The business environment has become increasingly uncertain and highly competitive, visuanathan N. and Percy S. (2009).
Kirzner (1997) and Machorec (1995) point out that firms must seek new knowledge in order to survive and prosper. In view of this, organisations are expected to exploit their strategic abilities, adapt and seek improvements in every area of the business, building on awareness and understanding of current strategies. They must be able to act quickly in response to opportunities and barriers (Papulova, E. and Papulora, Z, 2006). This turbulence has made several firms come to rely on alliances as strategic necessities for sustaining competitive advantage
…show more content…
(2010), a variable is an empirically applicable concept that takes on two or more values. For this study, we have two dominant variables and are the predictor (organizational mindfulness) and the criterion variable (strategic Alliance success). Under the predictor we have sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience and deference to expertise as dimensions, Weick & Sutcliffe (2001). While for the criterion variable we have objective clarity, Alliance design and alliance management as its measures Peter K. (cited in Business, the ultimate resources, 2011). An unidirectional conceptual framework would be adopted in this study and it’s presented in the following mathematical
How can firms minimize or manage the bumps, hurdles, or conflicts that often occur when firms join together in an alliance or partnership?
Because of the codesharing involved with the alliance, the other business’ reputation is very important. For example, if a Qantas customer from Australia buys a plane ticket to England, and stops at Dubai to get onto the second half of the trip which is operated by Emirates, the customer’s experience with Emirates may impact on the customer’s view of Qantas’ image. If, for example, the customer service was undesirable on the Emirates flight, then customers may feel that Qantas is a bad company as it partners with a business that has bad customer service. Therefore, one challenge of is alliance is that one business’ flaws may make customers feel that the business’ partners may also be
Before the alliance the two firms were in totally different market and they were also in different country but the industry was of same type. Both of the firms were aware about their future plan and lacking.
The contemporary business environment is dynamic, ever-changing and increasingly competitive. Their is potential for success, but even more for failure. Businesses are heavily influenced by the changing organisational environment and this intern creates much uncertainty for managers and organisations. With increasing uncertainty in the external environment, the more important it is that managers engage in continual planning. (Robbins 2012 p. 32) Businesses must be flexible and evolve in accordance with their external environment.
Businesses play a significant role with the economies of all countries, whether developed or developing. It contributes to the welfare of the society through the satisfaction of needs, provides a source of livelihood to millions of people worldwide. Businesses do not operate in vacuums but operate within business environments. The events in the environment of a company have a direct effect on the success or failure of that company. According to Jain, Trehan and Trehan (2009), business environments can be categorized in two: (1) internal business environment; (2) external business environment. Institutions and organizations are usually in a position of controlling their internal business environment. By doing so, they gain the ability of affecting their institutional performance. On the contrary, it is difficult for a business to control the external environment; however, businesses can identify in advance the opportunities and threats presented by the external environment and take decisive actions to ensure its continued success (Jain, Trehan & Trehan, 2009; Goyal & Goyal, 2009).
Svensson, G., 2001. 'Globalization' of Business Activities: A 'Global Strategy' Approach, Management Decision, 39(1), pp.6-18.
...d to learn from the chess game in terms of the ground rules and specific strategic management points of views. There are three common strategic principles and management expertises that the corporations need to be aware of and follow. First of all, it is highly advisable for them to conduct a macro environment evaluation through resorting to the PESTLE Analysis and the Porter’s Five Forces Model. Second, it is of significance to carry out self evaluation analysis with a view to better understanding the firms’ own advantages and capabilities through using SWOT Analysis. Last but not least, the corporation is advisable to conduct an all rounded competitor analysis in order to gain a detailed acknowledgement of the current circumstance possessed by the major competitors so as to assist them to generate a better corresponding strategies in the future business operation.
The paper focuses on the increased complexity of globalized organizations and methods of altering the process within the structure. Business and environment change constantly to sustain development in emerging markets and increase efficiency. Integration of relationships and processes of the world systems, help to manage local, regional and planetary balance to manage duplication of success become conceivable. The retail giant Wal-Mart exhibits its ability to transform the organization asynchronously with the increase integration of globalization.’ Wal-Mart unveils the type of integration possible between globalization, and business services as it adapts, eliminating redundancies and repetitive movement. It observes the effect and influence, propagated on business through it use of supply chains, and influence.
In the nutshell, changes in business environment are unforeseeable. It is common that sometimes company’s activity shall change to continues sustainable in the open market. Some company may threat of downsizing, bankruptcy or changing business model due to unfavorably change of business environment. Thus, it is important to manage change of business environment, which involved internal and external forces of change that contribute to incremental changes and transformation quantum changes in the organisation.
Both employing organizations and individuals must be prepared for the coming changes or fund their success limited. As for businesses, globalization and a rapidly evolving workforce are redefining how we think about competence, creativity, productivity, and the structuring of organizations.
In order to explore the nature of the practice of collaboration, the author has specifically focused on some of the concepts which challenges the individuals involved in collaborative alliance. Two main concepts have been explored to justify the challenges of the individuals. They are (i) Collaborative advantage, and (ii) Collaborative inertia. There exist dilemmas between these two concepts. Both the terms create a dilemma and a question arise of – “If achievement of collaborative advantage is the goal for those who initiate collaborative arrangements, why is collaborative inertia so often the outcome.” [Huxham, C, and Vangen, S. p- 53] These two concepts draw out the reason of what is always taken as granted in collaboration and what actually happens. Such perspectives results in collaborative inertia, even if the goal is to achieve the collaborative advantage.
This is a crucial part of a strategic analysis because ‘…organisations do not exist in a vacuum, they are part of a complex world’ (Bowman 1987:61) and many factors can influence operations, beneficially and unfavourably. However, these can be difficult to comprehend due to their complexity, diversity and fast changing nature. Necessarily a number of techniques have been developed to facilitate the process and to ‘…contribute to answering the key managerial question…’of what ‘…opportunities and threats might arise in the future’ (Johnson & Scholes 2002:99).
Globalization and economic slowdown has made businesses subject to a great deal of uncertainty. In this time of rapid change, economies worldwide change rapidly, new markets open up and old ones change, and demand for products is often uncertain. As such, businesses must be flexible and adaptable in the types of methods that they use...
Daniels, J. D., Radebaugh, L. H., and Sullivan, D. P., (2011). International Business: Environments and Operations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
The human resource management stands for the management of an entity’s workforce and all that relates to the workforce. The significance of human resource management includes recruitment, orientation, and the ability to retain employees. The human resource management with other managers utilizes these practices in order to produce a solution that relates to challenges. A competitive advantage refers to the business ability to gain the advantages of its economic activities that, it recognizes the organization’s ability to survive and overcome competition in the marketplace. This paper will discuss the concept of competitive advantage in human resource.