Competition Is Not Good For People

1434 Words3 Pages

Ancient China has a number of sayings about competition, such as, “seeking great honor results in no honor at all”. Theodore Isaac Rubin, a writer of both fiction and nonfiction, explains in his essay, “Competition and Happiness” competition seldom brings out the best and often brings out the worst in people. He argues that competition is a form of projection in which the development of self is abandoned to beat the next fellow. Rubin believes that, “competition is a residual of a primitive past, and it is not a genetic residual” (312). In the past, competition was necessary for people had to compete in order to survive. Even though, people were conditioned to compete in the past, it is not pertinent anymore as it became another aspect in the modern day. Rubin further states, “people brought up this way feel lost…because they exist to compete and they’ve lost their raison d’être in the new situation” (312) Learning to compete with others is taught by an individual’s family and the individual forgets why he/she is competing as they only focus on beating their fellow mates. Competition produces anxiety which can interfere with learning and disassociates with one’s own body. It is not instinctual because it is taught and it damages people and creates stress in their life. Competition teaches people to give their worst while as they only focus on what their fellow mate is doing. I agree with Rubin that “competition limit people’s ability to lead happy and satisfying lives”, for I am assured that competition is destructive to children's self-esteem, it interferes with learning, sabotages relationships, and isn't necessary to have a good time. First, human beings lose confidence and their self-esteem through competing with one anoth... ... middle of paper ... ...etition makes it difficult to regard others as potential friends or collaborators; even if one is not a rival today, one could be tomorrow. The first step to achieving of being happy and healthy is recognizing the value of competition is built on myths. Just because forcing children to try to outdo one another is counterproductive doesn't mean they can't keep track of how they're doing. There's no problem with comparing their achievements to an objective standard or to how they did yesterday or last year. But if the people value their children's intellectual development, they need to realize that turning learning into a race simply doesn't work. By definition, not everyone can win a contest. If one child wins, another cannot. This means that each child comes to regard others as obstacles to his or her own success and this is why competition is not good for people.

Open Document