Comparing the Works of William Blake and Jonathan Swift

532 Words2 Pages

William Blake and Jonathan Swift were writers with specific intentions. Both were concerned about the human condition of their times, and many of these concerns have no resolution today. Both created literary works allowing them to present their point of view in, yet their presentation in society was vastly different. You can read Gulliver’s Travels and understand what Swift’s intends. The story appeals to the sophisticated, well-informed reader who could discern his meaning and appreciate his satirical style. He deals with human nature and its folly. This ability to engage the reader with fantastical stories was his genius. Whereas with Blake, you cannot understand his point of view fully unless you also look at his art.

Both created worlds where they could speak about what they believed. Gulliver’s Travels, is a fantasy novel on the most superficial level, but it also reveals, through Gulliver’s eyes, a concept of an ideal world; a world that is “naturally disposed to every virtue, wholly governed by reason…” (Swift 184). Order, rule, sobriety—these are the principles he set bef...

Open Document