Companies merge and acquire other companies for a lot of strategic reasons with different degree of success. The success of a merger is measured by whether the value of the acquiring firm is enhanced by it. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on organization can be small and big in other cases. Mergers and acquisitions immediately impact organizations with changes of rights, and ideas and eventually, in practice. There are multiple reasons some are motives and financial forces just to name a few. There are financial risks of merging with or acquiring an organization this is why you must have a strategic plan in place in order to benefit. Companies merge with other companies for one main reason that is to make money. The vertical merger happens when a company moves up or down its own product line. The sensible reason for merging with or acquiring a company is that it makes financial sense. In November 2004 Sears and Kmart said that they were going to be merging together this combination would become the largest retail merger that there is. This has turned out to be a great spin for Kmart considering that they had bankruptcy issues less than a year earlier. Some complimented Kmart’s acquisition of Sears. Those most positive look to opportunities to cut unnecessary administrative expenses, increase buying power and cross-sell well known merchandise between Kmart and Sears. There are those who are very concerned about the acquisition. They are afraid that Wal-Mart, being their biggest competitor, will still be so much bigger than the combined Kmart and Sears. The name of the merged company will be changed it won’t be called sears. The acquisition of Sears cost to Kmart organiza... ... middle of paper ... ...alized cost. Two big named companies, have decided to join forces on the mobile front in hopes of gaining a small piece of the mobile markets. Lots of investor is hoping are hoping that this merger will give the big guy a little compactions and their competition is Apple. Once considered power houses in other markets. Fujitsu and Toshiba are getting ready to join forces. Fujitsu will take a majority stake in the new business enterprise.The collaborations of Fujitsu and Toshibas goals are to concentrate on their future strengthen their businesses and create a competitive business model that combines their complementary Strengths and capabilities. The merger will help Fujitsu and Toshiba makers share development costs, but the combined unit is unlikely to pose an immediate threat to total leaders such as Nokia and Samsung or even Apple.
Proper explanation of the current situation, involving the type and extent of the current problems. And the merger will bring progress over the current situation.
Kmart, contrarily, entered behind Wal-Mart as the second largest retailer in the United States after Sears’ reign. They, however, suffered a similar affliction to what felled Sears when Kmart ruled discount retail so heavily that they seemed almost unstoppable. However, with lack of solid knowledge on the business’ purpose and Wal-Mart as a strong competitor, there began a steep decline, along with Sears, that led to filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (New York Times 2002).
In a merging process, there will be two firms, one is the acquiring firm and the other is the merged firm. After merging, the CEO of the acquiring firm will be the CEO of the firm after the merging and also most of the executive managers of the acquiring firm will retain their positions but the CEO and executive members of the merged firm will get different positions in the firm. This article is supporting iGate Patni because, instead of focusing on the choice of leadership succession, IGate focused on the factors such as cultural and operational integration which is the reason for their success in merging with Patni. IGate is an American based IT company headquartered in Bridgewater, New Jersey.
Over one hundred years ago, an entrepreneur named Sebastian Spering Kresge opens his first retail store in 1899. The store was named Five-and-Dime and was located in downtown Detroit. The store was named Five-and-Dime because everything in the store was priced at either five cents or ten cents. This low price gained him a lot of customers and a lot of publicity. With this new found publicity, in 1912, he opened 85 more stores with annual sales of $10 million. As time went on, the prices have changed to $1 or less, but the business philosophy has remained the same. Around this time, the retail environment was getting very competitive, and the company needed to make some changes to keep up. In 1959, Kresge hired Harry B. Cunningham to become the president of the company. Under Cunningham leadership, the first Kmart store was opened in 1962 in Garden City, Michigan. In 1966, sales in 162 Kmart stores and Kresge stores topped the $1 billion mark and in 1968, the S. S. Kresge aired its first T.V. commercial. In 1976, Kresge made history by opening 271 Kmart stores in 1 year and becoming the first ever retailer to launch 17 million square feet of sales space in a single year. By 1977, nearly 95% of the S. S. Kresge sales were generated by Kmart so the company officially decided to change its name to Kmart Corporations. In 1991, Kmart opened the first supercenter in Medina, Ohio offering a full-service grocery area. In 1996, a complete redesign of Kmart was launched, changing its name to Big Kmart [or BigK] and in 1999, Kmart launch a new internet presence, named bluelight.com [now known as kmart.com]. In 2002, Kmart filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. (Corpor...
...of Kmart’s financial problems and unclear marketing strategy local stores have also suffered. Kmart struggles to change these negative images, and create a positive image to differentiate itself form its competitors. Even though Kmart has had a struggling past, changes can be made by management to improve stores status and attract customers.
Mergers and acquisitions transpire because in tough eras, firms yearn to benefit by buying new technologies, operatives reductions, grasping economies of scale quicker, and enhanced marketplace grasp and industry visibility. This is the immaculate scenario for a coalition, but many a times it’s the opposite case. Such synergy might just be in the minds of the heads of the two firms, and might or might not craft an enhanced value....
A merger is a partial or total combination of two separate business firms and forming of a new one. There are predominantly two kinds of mergers: partial and complete. Partial merger usually involves the combination of joint ventures and inter-corporate stock purchases. Complete mergers are results in blending of identities and the creation of a single succeeding firm. (Hicks, 2012, p 491). Mergers in the healthcare sector, particularly horizontal hospital mergers wherein two or more hospitals merge into a single corporation, are increasing both in frequency and importance. (Gaughan, 2002). This paper is an attempt to study the impact of the merger of two competing healthcare organization and will also attempt to propose appropriate clinical and managerial interventions.
Conglomerate mergers result in joining of firms which compete in different product markets, and which are situated at different production stages of the same or similar products. That is to say, neither the products nor the inputs of these merging firms are the same. Conglomerate mergers result in significant advantages gained by the merging firms since they are the fastest means of entry into different activity fields in the shortest possible time span. Moreover, they reduce the financial risks by “not putting all the eggs in one basket” (Gaughan, 2007). There are three types of conglomerate mergers:
As revealed by the SWOT analysis earlier Kmart has potential to pull itself out of its current position of facing closure. In order to exploit opportunities and counter threats Kmart needs to build on these competencies to strengthen its position and counter internal weaknesses against the single largest industry threat - increased competition in a mature market.
The type of merger between Electronic Data System (EDS) and AT Kearney is called Forward vertical merger. Forward vertical merger is when two or more companies combines together in the same industry but different field or when two companies producing goods and services for a product. Electronic data system, the US information technology group, brought AT Kearney, the global strategy consultancy firm in a deal worth $96m. Electronic data system was firm involving producing information technology equipment’s bought AT Kearney an IT consultancy firm.
Kmart's main weakness was that it had an aspiration to be all things to all people – its dabblings in drug stores, home improvement stores, bookstores, cafeterias and specialty stores in the 1980s and early 1990s seemed to spread the company very thin. This focus on diversification is just one example of how the retailer has often not made the wisest choices when faced with a tight spot. By the 1980s, just before the rise of Wal-Mart, Kmart had become complacent. It believed it would be the king of discount retailing, now and forever.
Overall, the main point of the merger was to help both organizations financially. Since Sears and Kmart were both facing financial deficits and significant declines, this merger was thought to bring about prosperity. However, there was no concrete strategy implemented that would ensure long-term
Should Kmart and Sears keep their own identities and have unique competitive strategies, or should they be combined in some way with a new overall corporate competitive strategy? Please defend your answer.
Today, we were called into the boss’s office and told that our company was about to go through a major restructuring. In two weeks, the organization will be merging with a national conglomerate and it is our job to get the “troops prepared”, as she put it. She stresses to us the importance of effective leadership and communication. She would like for us to establish and initiate a plan that will help the employees with the transition. Luckily for us, we just completed a seminar on organizational behavior and we know exactly what needs to be done to make this transition as positive and seamless as possible.
Mergers and acquisitions represent a major source of organizational change. If companies can identify the need for change, design the changes required and implement them effectively and efficiently, they would be more likely to survive and prosper.