Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
moral education in secondary schools
teaching morals in public schools
implications of moral development in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: moral education in secondary schools
Close-Minded Thinking A writer's mind should not take on blame for a bad example of writing. The writer’s opinion should always be valued. Perfectly acceptable as it may be to label a writer’s facts or information as incorrect, to point out a writer's own opinions, thoughts, views, or takes on a subject as incorrect displays a failure to connect with the writer. When a writer expresses their opinion openly and in return, a professional labels the piece as a display of close-minded thinking and badly argued writing, it would be wise to search within the words themselves to uncover a hidden voice or manner in which the author wrote them. This particular teacher does not deserve a pass for his criticisms, instead, chastised for a lack of understanding on where the writer comes from. Still, the writer makes the error in assuming an absolute moral to which all should acknowledge exists. One could in fact point out that the High School teacher displays close-minded thinking. Perhaps the writer comes from a background in which his parents from very early on instituted the opinion of homosexuality as being immoral. After all, our parents, peers, and tutors are responsible for instilling upon us our basis for moral understanding. While we all might not agree in full with them, they do have at least a slight impact on how we view the world. Consider, for example, Sarah Vowell and her relationship with her father in Shooting Dad. Sarah managed to be in complete disagreement with her father on many issues at a young age; guns were the primary example given to emphasize this. Sarah grew up with a belief that she did not take after her dad, yet in the end, she opened her eyes, thus revealing the similarities of character between ... ... middle of paper ... ...r’s beliefs with one another. Both the student and writer in the scenario given are, for lack of knowledge, making unfair and unjustifiable claims. The student has a misconception that homosexuality should be a moral absolute, and the teacher fails to understand the moral background of the student. All our morals are shaped early on in are lives, yet can be altered through experience and understanding. Works Cited Coles, Robert. “I Listen to My Parents and I Wonder What They Believe.” Open Questions: Readings for Critical Thinking and Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2005. Saenz, Benjamin. “Exile: El Paso, Texas.” Open Questions: Readings for Critical Thinking and Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2005. Vowell, Sarah. “Shooting Dad.” Open Questions: Readings for Critical Thinking and Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2005.
...hat of a father. The high level of sophistication and education in his teachers (factors he considers missing in his parents) makes him respect them much. The scholarship boy wishes his parents were exactly like the teachers (Rodriguez 16). Graff, on the other hand, critiques teachers. In his opinion, many literature teachers have lost touch with the passion for literature and are obsessed with professionalism, their journy to advance their careers and their fascination with analysis and theory (Graff 26).
Another way the author exemplified his opinion of teachers was though the list of “attitudes and practices, which mirror oppressive society as a whole” (Freire 73). Two examples from the list, “…the teacher knows everything and the students know nothing,” (73) and “…the teacher confuses the authority of knowledge with his or her own professional authority, which she and he sets in opposition to the freedom of the student,” (73) clearly validate Freire’s notion that the education system design allowed for job
Stern raves about some nebulous “they” who wishes to control the thoughts and minds of the populace. Where the first entries had clear ‘villains’, whether they be the church or concerned parents, the following stanzas direct their bilious contempt toward some sort of shadowy globalist conglomerate. It’s easy to state that the reason that teachers don’t assign Mark Twain to school children is because Twain was rebellious and provocative and ‘The Man’ wants to keep people submissive. But in actuality, it’s far more likely that they find the racial undertones of Twain’s works to be objectionable. I myself believe that political correctness is almost universally a sham, and while it 's true that schools do shy away from certain authors because of their content, any reasonable person must concede that, in the midst of the era of outrage culture, it would be easier for the school to assign a book that won’t cause
He said himself, “This doctrine is the devils own gospel, and, so far as accepted, blunts the moral sense of its victim, makes him a slave of the worst elements in school, and mars and destroys that sympathetic, generous, loving confidence which must always exist between ingenuous youth and a teacher whom they love.” He is stating that there should be an equal relationship between a student and a teacher and not a power trip of the teacher to the student. He again believed in equality however this time between students and their
Growing up in the bubbled LDS community of Pleasant View, Utah, most views on gay or lesbian relationships fell into the sinful category. My grade school classmates called each other gay using the term to demean. An elementary friend told me gay people were sent to hell and grossed her out. In sixth grade, this friend and I sat next to each other in class. The teacher was in her mid-forties, unmarried, had short hair, and wore masculine clothes. Our ignorant twelve-year-old minds jumped to the conclusion she was lesbian. I remember my friend and me concocting plans as to how we were going to prove our teacher was lesbian. Once again, we were idiot children. Throughout the year we discussed evidence we had found and its apparent validity. Along with the detective work, we would make comments about my teacher favoring girl class mates because she had crushes on them. For the third time, we were ignorant, idiotic and mean-hearted kids when it came to homosexuality. I stress this so much because we were impressionable. Our peers had given us the idea that being gay or lesbian was bad and without knowing any better, we stuck to it and acted...
...gays in this time period, Gene is not able to express his feelings and struggles with the concept of being different. As readers see Gene repressing his feelings because of the time period he lives in, it also is easy for them to see that the book itself is struggling to “come out” of the closet. Even though it is easy to find evidence that this is a gay novel, John Knowles never gives the readers a direct answer as to whether it absolutely is or not. In fact, although this is a work of fiction, a lot of Knowles’s actual life is infused into the book. Just like in the book, Knowles went to an all-boys boarding school in the first half of the twentieth century. Even though we cannot say that Knowles was gay, we know that he grew up in the same era of homophobia and may have still felt uncomfortable with expressing homosexuality openly--even through a fictional story.
Ever since I started talking this class, English 1301, with Dr. Piercy, I have been able to expand my writing and thinking skills. Not only was I able to make more better essays but I also learned important topics such as how education creates an impact in the world. In this essay I will be talking about three writings and how they are related to this course semester. The three writings are “On Bullshit” by Harry Frankfurt, “Why I Write Bad” by Milo Beckman,and “Statement of Teaching Philosophy” by Stephen Booth. How are these 3 writings related to this semester’s course work?
...and walked home.” Collins contrasts the students’ misbehavior with the teacher’s ignorance, thus implying a relationship between the history teacher’s inability to teach his students and their ensuing misbehavior.
We all have had this type of teacher and it makes the essay relatable. Murray provides a way that writing could be less frustrating and more successful. It makes the reader want to agree with him and wish they had a teacher who viewed writing as he does. His willingness to allow his students to figure out how writing works best for them without being concerned about a bad grade is refreshing makes the reader have an appreciation for his
...is students scored either a 5 or 6 on the test, which was the highest you could score. Our class was the only people who scored that high throughout the entire 11th grade class. I begin to realize that with his criticism it made me a better writer.
If I was a parent, I would be scared of teachers not explaining things right about the topic, and confuse my child about sexual identities. In Patterson’s book he states that “Some parents, for religious or other reasons, oppose homosexuality (and sexual freedom in general) and resent that the topic is raised with their children they may worry that their children will be somehow seduced or persuaded into becoming lesbian or gay, or they simply believe in the importance of the traditional heterosexual, nuclear family” (262). In other words, parents have a strong religion that blocks them to view things in different ways, and they are really strong about the idea of teachers talking to their kids about something they don’t believe in, and that will teach them to believe what their parents don’t believe. I agree with them because they might change their minds just because they’re telling them it’s correct to like someone with the same sex. I’m not against it once again, but it’s not right to influence a child about sexual identities at that
If a faculty advisor censors an article written by a gay student, they are following their traditional viewpoints against the homosexual lifestyle. Several researchers have addressed the issue of sexual preferences and consequential discriminative beliefs. According to research by Herek (1987), religion is one of the most important social agents in defining viewpoints against homosexuality, and their intolerance reflects on both the academic community and the entire society. As a moral realist, I cannot form prejudices because the main rule of moral realism states that the objective truth is not related to subjective beliefs. The perlocutionary analysis will be used in evaluating and responding to the issue because my goal is to persuade the faculty advisor that censoring articles based the author's sexual preferences is morally incorrect. In the letter, I will aim to persuade the faculty advisor that the ethical decision-making model behind removing the article is at fault, and I will explain both personal and community worldviews that endorse diversity while avoiding generalized statements to preserve the relationship with my significant other.
In Conclusion, I think teacher’s shouldn’t be like a “wild animal “or impetuous (294). Teachers should not be abusive like the teacher in the essay. I believe if we can be encouraging by telling a student that they did good, but they need to work on a particular part. Instead of belittling them, ask them engaging questions to get them to expand their minds, or to think more provokingly that would have a bigger effect. If we find that balance in the “force” and fight for it and for our students we can have a positive effect and still be cool.
There are certain moments in my writing process, even more than twenty years later, that I can still imagine hearing that sharply critical voice striking a deep and lasting blow as the journalism assignment replete with bloody red ink landed on my desk. “This is all wrong,” were the words my high school journalism teacher stabbed me with as she passed down the aisle pausing only long enough for me to catch a whiff of her nicotine breath. At the very same moment my stomach muscle knotted, my face burned as if with fever, and those four words echoed out of control over and over again in my ears. Notoriously late for class due to her love of smoking cigarettes in the teacher’s lounge (in those days smoking was allowed in school buildings), Ms. B’s entrance into the class on this particular day was no exception. With a flurry of authority, arrogance, and impatience, she appeared before me-the subservient and humble student. Her disdain for my writing was obvious in her written comments on the returned assignment. But it was the spoken word about my writing that intimidated and humiliated me, even to this very day when I allow myself to think back on the incident.
In their essay, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ (1946), William K. Wimsatt Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley, two of the most eminent figures of the New Criticism school of thought of Literary Criticism, argue that the ‘intention’ of the author is not a necessary factor in the reading of a text.