The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity

971 Words2 Pages

The Mythmaker is a book about how Paul takes the stories of Jesus that existed during his time and rescripts them to invent the entirely new and different religion of Christianity. For Maccoby, the historical Jesus was simply a Pharisaic Jew who had some new and interesting things to say and nothing more. He claims that the historical Jesus never intended to create a new religion separate from Judaism, but rather it was Paul, through his writings, who helped to inject pagan and gnostic elements into the Christ-Myth. The idea of Jesus as a dying and rising god was purely Paul's invention. From there, the gospel writers, who were influenced by Paul’s writings, helped to reinforce this new view of Jesus that was completely separate from who Jesus actually was.

Maccoby's thesis also suggests that if we want to know who the true historical Paul actually was, we need to look at the writings of the Ebionites – an extinct Jewish-Christian sect that existed around the early 2nd century. According to Maccoby, the Ebionites had a lot more credibility than Paul ever did because, they were “the authentic successors of the immediate disciples and followers of Jesus, whose views and doctrines they faithfully transmitted.” 1 Because of this, the opinions the Ebionites held of Paul and of Jesus should be respected and not automatically dismissed as propaganda. According to the Ebionites, they believed that Paul did not actually have a Pharisaic background, but instead believed that he was the son of Gentiles.

For Maccoby, Paul's relentless insistence on his Jewish background like in Philipians 3:4 where Paul writes,

“If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more circumcision the eighth day, of...

... middle of paper ...

...arisaic group. So if Gamaliel was not okay with putting the Christians to death, then neither was any Pharisee of his time. But Paul was a Pharisee of Gamaliel's time and he was okay with putting Christians to death. Therefore, according to Maccoby, there is a contradiction and either Paul was not truly a Pharisee or Gamaliel's speech as it is written in Acts did not happen. A lot of scholars tend to go with the latter, that the speech did not really happen. Of course there are other alternatives too. It is probable that there were different opinions within the Pharisaic group, of how they should handle this new Jewish-Christian sect. It is not any stretch to imagine that one group wanted them killed, while the other thought it was perfectly fine to let them live. Either way, concluding that Paul could not be a Pharisee from this evidence is a little extreme

More about The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity

Open Document