The Chemical Warfare Service

1016 Words3 Pages

On 10 July 1943, the allied forces attacked Sicily to stop the German occupation of Europe. The allied forces carried out combined attacks utilizing paratroopers, the Navy and Army land forces to start a battle that gave the allied forces a stronghold in Europe that fed into other military operations and a training location for Soldiers landing in Normandy later in the war. The initial battle and beach landing was anything but flawless. The ocean was violent and the paratroopers were scattered off their target area by more than 20 miles (Birtle, 2003). The axis forces unsuccessfully attempted to stop the allied forces by attacking units landing on the beaches. Nevertheless, the allied forces pushed forward and landed on the beaches of Sicily. The allied forces including the 83rd Chemical Battalion, which employed the 4.2 inch HE mortar, were engaged in intense battle against the Germans and the Italian forces (Birtle, 2003). Consequently, the Success of the operation was largely due to the mobility, accuracy and lethality of the 4.2 inch HE mortar. The Chemical Mortar Units provided critical support to the infantry units. However, the 4.2 Inch mortar has not been combat proven in battle prior to this operation. The mortar is a product of the efforts of Soldiers assigned to the Chemical Warfare Service Technical Command. An intuitive Officer named Lewis M. McBride invented The HE Mortar (M2) and its delivery system. The Chemical Warfare Service Technical Command team was led by COL Lewis McBride, Dr. G. S. Maxwell and their co-workers (Brophy, 1966). He helped the CWS stay on the edge of advanced chemical warfare. This weapon is a modification of the 4 inch British Stokes mortar. The British Stokes mortar was the primary g... ... middle of paper ... ... the battle of Sicily, are a direct result of the efforts of COL McBride and the Chemical Mortar Companies. This validated the Chemical Corps effectiveness in the Theater of operations. We as Chemical Corps Soldiers may not have been inimitable, with a specific mission, and would only be augmented attachments to different units if they did not prevail. “Elementis, Regamus, Proelium”. Works Cited Birtle, A. (2003, October 03). WWI campaigns: Sicily. Retrieved from: http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/72-16/72-16.htm Brophy, L. (1966). The chemical warfare service from laboratory to field . Office of the Chief of Military History. Lindberg, K. (2005, July 01). Soldier, machinist, inventor, patriot--the legacy of colonel Lewis McBride. Kleber, B. (2003). The chemical warfare service: Chemicals in combat. Office of the Chief of Military History.

Open Document