Characterisation of GST-GRP1PH

1425 Words3 Pages

Characterisation of GST-GRP1PH

GST-GRP1PH was characterized using SDS–PAGE with sensitive Coomassie stain followed by automated in-gel digestion and LC-MS/MS analysis (results not shown) [64]. An 85% peptide coverage of the PH domain was obtained using MS/MS analysis (results not shown).

GST-GRP1PH binding specificity toward PI(3,4,5)P3 was analysed using both overlay phosphoinositide assay and Biosensor analysis (Figure 2). GST-GRP1PH was found to recognize specifically immobilized PI(3,4,5)P3 when compared to immobilized PI(4,5)P2 (Figure 2A) and 2B). A standard curve generated by plotting the average intensity of the dot blot versus the amount of immobilized PI(3,4,5)P3 showed that approximately 4ng (3.3pmoles) of PI(3,4,5)P3 could be detected in this assay.

Binding specificity was also characterized using biosensor analysis. GST-GRP1-PH was injected at various concentrations (1.5µM, 750nM, 375nM, 188nM, 94nM) over immobilized PC/PE/PI(4,5)P2 and PC/PE/PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes (Figure 2C and 2D). GST-GRP1PH was observed to bind specifically to immobilized PC/PE/PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes (Figure 2C) as compared to immobilized PC/PE/PI(4,5)P2 PC/PE (Figure 2D).

Kinetic constants were extracted from the biosensor curves from global analysis using 1/1 Langmuir binding with mass transfer. Analysis of the interaction between GST-GRP1PH and immobilized PI(3,4,5)P3 gave an apparent association rate (ka) of 4.5 x 104M-1s-1 and apparent dissociation rate (kd) of 1.6 x 10-3s-1 resulting in an equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of 35.5nM.

Fluorescent imaging of GST-GRP1PH in resting and EGF stimulated HEK293T, LIM1215 and LIM2550 cells

Confocal microscopy was used to analyse PI(3,4,5)P3 localisation using GST-GRP1PH in resting and...

... middle of paper ...

...nhibition on the EGF-dependent redistribution of GST-GRP1PH. LY294002, a specific and potent inhibitor of PI3K, was used in these experiments (Figure 6). HEK293T, LIM1215 and LIM2550 cells were incubated in 1, 3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100µM inhibitor for an hour before stimulation with EGF for 5min. . LY294002 inhibited the formation of PI(3,4,5)P3 at the plasma membrane following EGF stimulation in a concentration dependent manner, as detected by fluorescence confocal imaging (Figure 6). The membrane/cytoplasm fluorescence ratio was calculated for each inhibitor concentration and used to generate inhibitor response graphs (Figure 7). One phase decay non-linear regression analysis was performed for each cell line and the IC50 value calculated (Figure 7). The IC50 values for the HEK293T, LIM1215 and LIM2550 cell lines were 5.7µM, 1.7µM and 8.7µM respectively.

Open Document