The Causes and Effects of Microleakage in Posterior Composite Restorations; How Can Dentists Minimize these Phenomena

1185 Words3 Pages

INTRODUCTION Composite resins have been a significant aesthetic alternative to amalgam restorations for more than sixty years.1 A hindrance to this method of restoration is the phenomenon of microleakage. Microleakage results from an imperfect bond, leaving a microscopic gap, allowing molecules and ions to flow between the tooth and restoration interface.2 Lack of margin integrity has been implicated in patient sensitivity complaints, secondary caries formation, corrosion of dental materials, and aesthetically displeasing staining at the margin.2 This paper will discuss the basis and discovery of microleakage, causes and effects of the phenomenon including polymerization shrinkage, teeth whitening agents and certain etching techniques, as well as prevention methods the operator can employ to minimize microleakage in posterior composite restorations. The study of microleakage dates back to 1912 when Dr. WE Harper first researched the phenomenon.3 Natural teeth were simulated in the study by using steel dies with class II preparations built into them. A tube was then attached through the pulpal floor of the dies and air pressure ranging from 3 to 30 psi was applied. The emergence of air bubbles from the margins indicated microleakage had taken place. MATERIALS AND METHODS Polymerization shrinkage A comparison of various composite resins A research study comparing 17 different flowable and non-flowable composite resins was performed.4 The measured parameters include: shrinkage (vol%), contraction stress (Mpa), and tensile modulus (GPa). Figure 1 describes the materials tested. Shrinkage was measured by mercury dilatometry. Contraction stress measurements were obtained using a tensilometer apparatus as shown in Figure 2. Each compos... ... middle of paper ... ...sin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro. Oper Dent. 2010; 35(6):634-40. 7. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater. 2001; 17(4):340-6. 8. Collins LZ, Maggio B, Gallagher A, York M, Schäfer F. Safety evaluation of a novel whitening gel, containing 6% hydrogen peroxide and a commercially available whitening gel containing 18% carbamide peroxide in an exaggerated use clinical study. J Dent. 2004; 32 Suppl 1:47-50. 9. Crim GA. Post-operative bleaching: effect on microleakage. Am J Dent. 1992; 5(2):109-12. 10. Da Silva Dominguez L, Martinez-Insua A, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84(3):280-8.

More about The Causes and Effects of Microleakage in Posterior Composite Restorations; How Can Dentists Minimize these Phenomena

Open Document