GPS Tracking Case Study

1013 Words3 Pages

Jane Rogers the financial manager at Plants Inc. a landscaping business in Chicago concurs that employers should ethically implement the use of GPS tracking in their companies. Rogers uses GPS to track and monitor outfield workers during working hours and argues that it increases efficiency and promotes confidence in prompt services to clients. Rogers supports the need for restrictive and regulative legislation in GPS tracking to create parameters within which employers can operate and be held accountable. She points out that she passively tracks employees during working hours and only resorts to active monitoring of employees after she has received complaints from clients. Rogers also states that she reminds her employees to turn-off their …show more content…

Eric Bland a journalist for NBC News covered an investigative article on the vulnerabilities of GPS devices that everyday citizens have become accustomed. Bland uncovered that a spoofer can jam GPS signals thereby rendering a device with GPS inactive, more interestingly is that a spoofer can create a false signal that overpowers the actual real signal. The false signal transmits like the original signal but offers incorrect and or fabricated destination to the GPS receiver. In such an instance the spoofer would control the victim’s time and destination. While the thought of driving or arriving into an unknown location is frightening and might threaten safety, it is the number of national infrastructure reliant on GPS and vulnerable to spoofers that raises genuine concern and fright in regards to national security. The country’s electrical power grids, generators, airports and law enforcement are examples of infrastructures and institutions that relay on the GPS for daily functioning. Brent Levina adjunct professor at Virginia Tech decide to build a spoofer to better highlight the weaknesses of the GPS (Bland, …show more content…

The Social Contract Theory would apply in preservation of ethics in the workplace as it considers an action to be good if it is accepted by collective group of rational people and is therefore considered binding (Nielsen, 2013). The Social Contract theory would be used to collectively determine whether GPS tracking of employees is ethical. Employees and employers would be required to collectively agree on the benefits of tracking such as increased productivity, efficiency, cost reduction and better accountability all of which would translate to more profits for the company and bonuses for the employees. The employees would consent to GPS tracking and monitoring during office hours while the employer would be required to forego tracking and monitoring during lunch breaks and outside working hours, otherwise the employer would be in violation of the collective agreement. Employees would also be required to abide by their duties and responsibilities during working hours to avoid violation of the agreement. The Social contract theory would also include consequences in the instance of violation for both the employer and employee

Open Document