The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions:
Why is the soft drink industry so profitable?
Compare the economics of the concentrate business to the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different?
How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry’s profits?
Can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non-carbonated drinks?
The soft drink industry is a highly profitable industry and its success is due to the large consumption of non-alcoholic beverages through which both concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable. Given the U.S. Industry consumption Statistics, Exhibit 1, it is clear that, after deducting beer and wine, soft drinks account for about 90 % of the total liquid consumption, while Coke and Pepsi account for about 75 % of the soft drink industry. The high consumption of CSDs is related to the soft drink industry selling to consumers through five principal channels: food stores, convenience stores, vending, fountain and other. Out of the five channels the case describes vending as the most profitable channel for the soft drink...
... middle of paper ...
...e and Pepsi’s already established image as producers of premium product is key to discouraging other companies from entering the soft drink industry. However, as the market in the U.S has leveled off, they should continue to invest globally in marketing and advertising for further profit growth, which will in turn positively influence their well established brands to further increase soft drink sales and profits.
The marketing campaigns must be tailored to meet the foreign markets’ demands, by respecting the consumers’ culture and flavor preferences. Furthermore, in the foreign markets the local brands must not be underestimated as these present high competition for Coke and Pepsi, therefore in order for the kings of the soft drink industry to expand their reign globally they must partner with the local soft drink firms and customize soft drinks with local tastes.
Pepsi operates its beverage business quite differently than Coke. Coke sells concentrate to independent bottlers while Pepsi owns its bottling and concentrate operations. This makes Peps...
The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten brands sold. Colas are the dominant flavor in the U.S carbonated soft drink industry; however, popularity for flavored soft drinks has grown in recent years. The changing demographics of the U.S population have been an important factor in the growing popularity of these flavored soft drinks. The possible impact of this factor will be addressed later in the case.
Eating regimen drinks flew up as well, making a radical new pop section. Pepsi's effective invasion into the nibble sustenance business with Frito Lay have helped it fundamentally, particularly in the previous decade. Then, Coke has stayed entirely in drinks. Despite the fact that Pepsi's refreshment brands may not be as solid, its nibble sustenance business is gigantic. Coke has a major lead in the cola piece of the overall industry over Pepsi, yet Pepsi's different business lines pull in more money. Each brand has a unit of big names on their side. The two brands have rolled out huge amounts of improvements to their logos all through their histories. Neither looks anything as they made unique. They've both held onto the advanced world as web-based social networking gets greater and greater - yet Coke is by all accounts faring better so
Coca cola has always dominated the markets outside United States unlike Pepsi’s internationalization strategy that took too long. Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
The fear or threat of new entrants in the soft drink industry is low, compare to any other industry like restaurant chain or fast food and retail chain. Carbonated Soft drink industry has high barriers for new entrants. Brand loyalty is one the extremely high barrier for new entrants. The threat of competition has medium pressure on the market strategy for the carbonated soft drink industry because switching cost is low for any consumer. I.e. if you don’t like or want to taste of soda from Coca-Cola you can easily switch to Pepsi. Health awareness is major impact on beverage industry because today’s consumer have become more aware and health conscious. Other factor is advertising, coca cola spending $230 million in advertising for its flagship Coca-Cola drink. This will put more pressure on new competitors or new entrants. For any new entrants or corporation needs to spend more money which is not possible in early years of product launch. People who consume sugary drinks regularly: 1 to 2 can a day or more have more 26% chance of type 2 diabetes than people who rarely have such drinks. Risks are even greater in young children, adults. Due to awareness demand of healthy beverages and health awareness the competition from the health drinks provider has increased day by
As we all should know, PepsiCo is one of the world’s leader in convenient food and beverages. PepsiCo shares are traded worldwide and particularly in NYSE (United States). PepsiCo is in the same line with Coca cola and Cadbury Schweppes as the dominating beverage companies. PepsiCo has successfully built a great brand name rivaling with coca cola, probably because PepsiCo unlike coca cola has its own bottling companies. With a competitive strategy based on differentiation rather than cost leadership like its fellow competitors PepsiCo invests highly in new packaging, flavors, formulas to outsmart their competition. Founded in 1919, producing a variety of sweet and grain-based snacks, carbonated and non-carbonated
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is one that is very competitive. A few firms dominate this industry, most notably Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola. This is due to substantial barriers to entry. Cadbury-Schweppes, producer of products such as 7up and Dr. Pepper is the third leading company in this industry. Due to the dominance of Coca Cola and Pepsi, Cadbury-Schweppes faces the daunting task of having to fight for market share and survive in this fiercely competitive industry. Using economic analysis for support, Cadbury-Schweppes will need to use its strengths in the non-cola categories to compete in this CSD industry.
coca cola company has been noted to be among those with successful business strategies in the world market. Also, it is a large corporation with over 70,000 employees. It has established its brand in over 200 countries including Japan. Out of the 70,000 employees, 59,000 are spread out in the 200 nations across the globe. The case study provides the history of coca cola Company regarding strategies it has employed in the past and the rate of their success. The one-size fits all approach used by Goizueta served the company till his successor took over in the 1990s. The company’s primary problem was crafting and executing an effective strategy to utilize its
PepsiCo is one of the most recognized names in the snack and beverage industry, with brands like Frito-lay, Gatorade, Tropicana, and Quaker, however, it is best known for its flagship soft drink brand - Pepsi and its rivalry with Coca-Cola. To begin, PepsiCo first caught my Interest in the way it manages its business and markets its products. PepsiCo being a relatively young company compared to its rival Coke, has proven to be a formidable opponent going “head to head” with one of the biggest companies in the world (Coca-Cola). Now, when I notice PepsiCo’s growth, the first thing that came to my mind was that it is thanks to its great marketing campaigns, that Pepsi has grown to become the globally recognized brand that it is today. I also admire PepsiCo because I think the there is a high level of entrepreneurship in the way they acquired smaller brands like Gatorade thereby eliminating their competition before they become competition.
The principal benefit is the desire to quench the thirst of all their patrons. The point of parity in the brands is the fact that both beverages are famous among the people, under the beverage group and always up-to-date with their customer’s requirement. The point of difference lies on the image each brand reflects on the customers. Pepsi have continuously been similar in their “fun and young” dispositions, the two establishments have steadily remained on separate courses throughout the decades. For the most part, Pepsi has stuck with its elevated energy, music and comedy-driven strategy. Pepsi is the cool fashionable brand which is undoubtedly associated with the youth and the celebrity; whereas, Coca-Cola is more of an emotional brand. Coca-Cola advertisements portray a human experience in two fundamental ways. Firstly, awhile before global branding was the movement it is nowadays, Coca-Cola was incorporating diversity, as obviously viewed in its long-running “I’d like to buy the world a Coke” sequence of commercials, depicting persons from around the globe joining simultaneously in Coke and song. (Johnson, J.,
Coke and Pepsi have been raging war for over a century now, turning their sodas into a multi-billion-dollar industry. Coke has been able to drive more earnings for its bottom line, and while Coke’s net income has been trending downward in recent years, it manages to stay ahead thanks to superior margins. Pepsi, on the other hand, has produced consistent net profit margins of around 10%, while Coke margins have been in the 15-18% range for the past several years (O’Brien). Every company has a Market Cap, which is basically a fancy way of saying how much the company is worth, and Coca-Cola’s market cap is a whopping $180 billion. Pepsi’s Market Cap is $150 billion, which may not seem like a big difference, but $30 billion is a lot of cheddar. Therefore, Coca-Cola owns 51% of the soft drink market, whereas Pepsi only owns 22% of it. Coke claims to own a total of 35 different brands, including Fanta, Sprite, Powerade, Vitaminwater, and many others. Pepsi owns 22 different brands, including 7up, Gatorade, and Mountain Dew “Coke (Coca-Cola) vs Pepsi - Soda
Brand Image / Loyalty: Coke and Pepsi have a long history of heavy advertising and this has earned them huge amount of...
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
Experimentation with the new market for carbonated beverages on the decline coke has done experiments in new flavors and healthier alternatives to try to stay competitive. As well as investing in “Keurig Green Mountain is a K-Cup maker but has a new Keurig Cold that can deliver Coca-Cola through the new system.” (Cooper, 2014)