Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how globalization impact national identity
how globalization impact national identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how globalization impact national identity
Being raised in Ghana, receiving higher education in England and working as a professor in the United States certainly helped Kwame Anthony Appiah receive a fair share of different cultures. Appiah is a recognized philosopher with several published books and an impressive track record of accomplishments. His article The Case for Contamination, which was published in The New York Times, speaks on the topic of how globalization affects individuals in many aspects of their life. He discusses how forcefully preserving cultures can harm a culture more than help it. While the article is lengthy, it goes into great detail about how globalization affects people in countries all over the world, even Ghana. Globalization makes a large impact on the world we see today and cultural groups can benefit from the effects of globalization because it promotes diversity, creates cosmopolitan citizen development, and allows economic growth.
Think of the term ‘globalization’. Your first thought may be of people from all corners of the Earth exchanging ideas, views, products, and so much more. Appiah introduces his article by describing a scene of a traditional Wednesday festival in the town of Kumasi. He allows the reader to visualize the traditions held by those in attendance, but begins his case by providing details of men on their cellphones and holding conversations on contemporary topics such as H.I.V/AIDS. When Appiah speaks of “contamination,” he highlights the way one culture is influenced by another accepting an exchange of ideas. In his article he asks, “why do people in these places sometimes feel that their identities are threatened?” (Appiah). This question raises a topic that is central to the unification of peoples’ ideals and cultures...
... middle of paper ...
...kes a great argument showing us how the positive results outweigh the negative. Contamination isn’t so bad after all.
Works Cited
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. "The Case For Contamination." The New York Times. The New York Times, 31 Dec. 2005. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Brookes, Julian. "Cosmopolitanism: How To Be a Citizen of the World." Mother Jones. N.p., 23 Feb. 2006. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Fan, G., and X. Zhang. "How Can Developing Countries Benefit from Globalization: The Case of China." Eldis. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Martell, Luke. "Conflicts in Cosmopolitanism and the Global Left." Policy Network. N.p., 17 Nov. 2011. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Palmer, Tom G. "Globalization, Cosmopolitanism, and Personal Identity." Ethics & Politics 2 (2003): 1-15. Web.
Wang, Yi. "Globalization Enhances Cultural Identity." Intercultural Communication Studies XVI.1 (2007): 83-86. Web.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. Global Politics: A New Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.
Gardner, Robert, and Wayne Lavold. "Chapter 9-12." Exploring Globalization. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2007. N. pag. Print.
Kwame Anthony Appiah is a contemporary philosopher born in London. Although raised in the “Western” world, he comes from Ghanaian descent, making his life rich in culture. He presents a compelling argument in his piece “The Case for Contamination”. Appiah argues that we are living in a globalized world, and that while characteristics and ideas in society are changing, it does not necessarily mean that there is a loss of culture. His “case for contamination” preaches the notion that sometimes change is good, and that in order for us to thrive as a society, change is need and should be welcomed with grateful attitude.
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Drohan, Madelaine. “Spoils of globalization must go to all”. Globe and Mail Metro Edition January 2001
4."Globalization in Everyday Life." Beyond Borders: Thinking Critically About Global Issues. New York: Worth, 2006. 471-571. Print.
However, he notices that despite the difficulty of following the cosmopolitan order (laws of war and human rights) “states and emerging powers have demanded inclusion in the multilateral order” (38), and have not abandoned it. This allows Hed to say that “a political space has opened up to re-forge the multilateral order on a more inclusive basis” (38): once again, the ability to imagine a new cosmopolitan project (which would be hard to oppose with, say, “traditional values” project) becomes a key question. Hed thinks that is possible, but he is also afraid that just like the shaping of the modern national state took centuries to happen, the cosmopolitan order will take long time to come into action; time, during which global challenges (e.g. ecological) will “reshape the conditions of human life” forever (39). And because of the danger that cosmopolitanism “as a world-making project will continue to try to encompass [these] alternative words, and their aspirations for the universal, within a single frame, reducing discussion to a debate about principle and pluralism” (Moore 108), the task of every individual to seek for alternatives is getting more urgent. The road to
Lisa Lowe’s introduction on the word “globalization” was interesting as it reminded me of the readings and lectures regarding colonization of the United States. Globalization is described conditions that increased economic, social, and political interdependence among people. The article allows for comparisons to be made with eighteenth century America. For example, the arrival of English colonists led to a change in the North American landscape. This could also be described as an invasion of native land as colonists felt the land belonged to them. Similarly, Globalization also mentions American invasion in the context of the conflicts against Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, both seventeenth and twentieth century America appear to some effect
DeJonge, Alissa. Globalization: How to Maximize Gain and Minimize Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
The Globalization Reader. 2011. Fourth Edition. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli, eds. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
The first tenant of cosmopolitanism, which he calls a “strand,” is the basic principle that, whenever possible, one human being should reduce the suffering of another. Suffering is an experience that binds humans together and is part of a shared human experience. Based on both a principle of reciprocity and out of respect for human dignity which all people posses as a result of shared humanity, cosmopolitans should seek to lift the lives they encounter out of
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. "The Case For Contamination." The New York Times. The New York Times, 31 Dec. 2005. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.
John Baylis, S. S. (2011). The Globalisation of World Politics; An Introduction to international relations (Fifth ed.). Oxford.
Those who support globalization believe it is a positive concept because it promotes the diffusion of wealth, culture, knowledge, and technology. Proponents argue that the dissemination of information and wealth of this type will only benefit citizens, from the poorest in developing countries, to the wealthiest in established countries. In addition, they claim the integration of cultures and economies leads to the spread of information, which also increases religious, cultural, and racial tolerance. However, in spite of all these well-intentioned ideas, globalization h...
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.