Parliamentary democracy comes to mind when many think about Canada’s political system. Parliamentary democracy is a political system in which the federal government’s power is distributed throughout the body of its citizens. This system will allow the public to vote a party to power in which the leader of that party will become the prime minister. However, Canada’s democracy is often questioned as it is diminishing from the hands of the common people and growing in the hands of the elites; elites being the wealthy and powerful individuals and/or corporations. The democratic principle in Ottawa is no longer faithfully practiced by the federal government and therefore is in decline. This is due to the fact that the electoral system is faulty, there is a rising prime-ministerial government, and the increase in influential corporations that now take democracy into their own hands have become more evident. Although this issue may seem invisible to the common eye today, the truth behind the emerging dictatorship society is startling. The mindset of people today has led people to stop seeking parliament for help allowing Ottawa to act as it pleases. A new paradigm is needed or the people will continue to believe that getting involved with the government is a waste of time resulting in the abuse of parliamentary conventions and procedures at a federal level.
The electoral system is flawed and a reform towards the way members of parliament are elected into power is needed in order to save the democratic decline. It is crucial to realize that the Canadian voting system revolves around first-past-the-post (election won by part with most votes) and not proportional representation (number of seats won are proportional to the number of votes...
... middle of paper ...
...ay. The conventions are simply being misused in order to satisfy the opinions of the powerful. Moreover, the wealthy elites and established corporations have been able to manipulate the meaning of democracy with money by influencing decisions at a federal level. This issue of declining democracy is extremely important as it’s an issue that affects all the people of the state but at the same time remains hidden due to the lack of civic literacy and interest in politics. It is important to realize that democracy only exists when the people are willing and able to show interest towards the government. These issues exist today and therefore should be articulated to the major population. If people do not get involved, the prime minster will continue his or her actions as there would be no public ridicule and the elites will continue to shadow our opinion with their own.
Although Canadian electoral system has always undergone periodic reforms, new challenges always accompany electoral changes and therefore the system should be consistently reformed to meet new circumstances.The current electoral system in Canada is a product of a series of electoral changes that have always taken place since the foundation of the Canadian confederation in the mid 1880s. During the early years, the rights of individuals to vote were significantly limited as only white males had the
There are a number of electoral systems in Canada that might be used in the future to determine how votes are cast and how the results are translated into seats in the House of Commons. But there is no flawless electoral system that can ascertain universal agreement among political actors, experts and the public at large. The major reason why this is true is because the design of an electoral system is principally a political problem that involves value-laden decisions and not a technical problem
Strengthening Canadian Democracy The views of Canadians In the report by Paul Howe and David Northrup titled, “Strengthening Canadian Democracy: the Views of Canadians” Policy Matters 1:5, Canadians attitudes towards government including questions about electoral system reform, representation and the rate of veter turnout.(Howe & Northrup, 2000) After reading, this report it is clear that many Canadians find many issues of their government to be unacceptable. One of the most menacing concerns
The Government of Spain Political System Spain is a parliamentary monarchy. Chief of state is the hereditary monarch and the head of government is the President of the Government. The President designates the cabinet which is called the Council of Ministers. Spain is also has a bicameral legislative branch. The General Courts or National Assembly or Las Cortes Generales consists of the Senate or Senado and the Congress of Deputies or Congreso de los Diputados (CIA World Factbook). In order for
easier to vote for the first time, and the government also needs to send the message to young people that their vote matters. Both goals can be accomplished with a rather simple adjustment of the electoral system. With the implementation of election-day voter registration and a single transferable vote system, the United States of America can show its young citizens that it is not only easy to vote, but that their vote is actually worth something. Before the problem of low turnout can be solved,
programs such as Internet voting and better voter education, such programs create only a partial solution. It will take great strides to create a system in which American citizens will be represented in the political process, and only then will young Americans be truly compelled to vote. One way to achieve this goal is through the adoption of a system of proportional representation. This paired with the implementation of Internet voting, increased voter education, and same day voting will ensure
Report on Winner-Take-All "Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation. There's something else
The Controversy Over the Electoral College System A number of Americans fail to realize that when they vote they are not voting for the president and vice-president directly, but for electors who then cast their ballots in the Electoral College. Until the recent battle between Gov. George W. Bush and Vice-president Al Gore for the presidency, this new generation of American voters has never witnessed a controversial election. Historically, there have been problematic elections allowing voters
President Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush. The election took place on Nov 7, 2000. Under our electoral college system each state votes for our new president separately, a winner is then declared in each state and is awarded “electoral votes” that is equal to the states number of representatives in the House and Senate. Gore led Bush 266-246 and 270 votes are required for victory. Florida with 25 electoral votes did not have an official winner because the result was inside of the margin of error for
The book written by Mary Lawrence (1996) called My People Myself is a great story of a native women’s struggle in society. The book does an excellent job of portraying a native women’s life on an Indian reserve in British Colombia. With Mary Lawrence’s real life story the struggles facing natives are brought to the forefront and the truths of growing up as a native Indian are described in the harsh settings of old run down houses. Readers are able to read and see that native Indians have endured
The Indian Residential School System was run by the Canadian Government with the help of various churches with the objective of “killing the Indian in the child” (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada 2015). An estimated 150 000 First Nations, Métis and Inuit children passed through the Residential School System between 1867 and 1996, and life for these children was lonely and alien (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada 2015). The Canadian Government has tried to maintain mutually
residential schools. Why did we the Canadian Government have so much hatred towards Aboriginals? Before opening residential schools, the Canadian government believed they were responsible to help teach aboriginal children in Canada English and really bring them away from the aboriginal culture. Also there was so much discrimination against Aboriginals; many times Canadians would say the phrase “Kill the Indians” which showed how much hatred was shown to Aboriginals. The Canadian government funded all the expenses
As one looks back to times when hardships fell on First Nations in respect to education, treaties, and the justice system what you will find written in this essay is a comparison to what was then and what is now. The world of the First Nation’s treaties questions ignorance of oral history, the way the treaties were upheld but not respected and the common agreements between Canadian government and aboriginal law. The ignorance is how the oral history of first nations was ignored and forgotten. The
child,” this was one of the many atrocious quotes which were spoken during the peak of residential schools from 1913 to 1932. Residential schools were government-sponsored, church ran schools established to assimilate Aboriginal children into Euro-Canadian culture. This quote means what it simply says, to remove the Indian culture out of a child. There were many quotes which outlined the goals of residential schools in Canada; some of them as shown in source II for example, were made by Duncan Campbell
Nicholas Flood Davin,” From 1831 to 1969 more than 150,000 aboriginal children were forced into Indian Residential Schools. The government of Canada used this system to assimilate young aboriginal children. The government and many churches joined to run these schools. Indian Residential Schools were one of the biggest stains in Canadian history because they violated human rights, tried to eliminate aboriginal culture and created the lasting effects which are still felt today. Residential