Question Presented: Under Californian workers’ compensation law can a worker receive workers’ compensation and when the injury was self-inflicted, and when their participation in the activity was voluntary, and when the activity took place after the work day and when the worker did not want to say no to their supervisor and when they were anxious to get on their boss’s good side and while during the activity business was discussed and when the company built the court for a director of sales, and when the director believed that inviting employees to play was a great way to get to know their employees, to increase morale and camaraderie at the company but when at the activity the employee’s injury was self-inflicted, and when their participation of in the activity was voluntary, and when the activity took place after the work day. Short Answer: Lance Baldwin (Baldwin) will be able to prove that he subjectively believe that the paddleball match was required for his job and he will also be able to prove that it is objectively reasonable that the paddleball match was part of his employment at Success Solutions, Inc. (SSI). The reason being that it is objectively reasonable is because he court was on company ground and was constructed for the Director of Sales and Marketing, Carla Frasch (Frasch). Frasch would often use the paddleball court and matches to get to know SSI’s employees, and to increase morale and camaraderie at the company, promote fitness and casually talk about the business. It is objectively reasonable that Baldwin would participate in the matches to be on Frasch’s “good side,” and that he would have the “in” with Frasch. With it, being so early in career with SSI Baldwin would not want to upset his boss by refusing to ... ... middle of paper ... ...mpensation. CITE. SSI is in violation of California Labor Code § 3600 (a) (8), “to post and keep posted in a conspicuous place or places a notice advising employees of the provisions of this subdivision.” CITE. Baldwin will be able to prove that it is objectively reasonable that the paddleball match was part of his employment. It is objectively reasonable that Baldwin followed his colleges suggestions to participate in the matches to be on Frasch’s good side, and that he would have the “in” with Frasch. With it being so early in career with SSI Baldwin would not want to upset his boss by refusing to play. It is also reasonable that SSI would promote physical fitness at their facilities and that one of their employees could be injured. The court will find that Baldwin satisfies the objectively reasonableness test, and would be able to collect workers’ compensation.
The worker alleges that he suffered a stroke due to the pressures experienced at work, including negotiating tensions between managerial staff and other employees, increasing volume of demands due to a MYOB file being corrupted and policies and procedures requiring being written, implemented, and presented, as well as material changes to his role. The worker's case is that the stress contributed in a material way to the occurrence of the stroke such as to make it compensable pursuant to section 7 of the RTW Act.
(5 points) Based on the facts of the case you have selected, is it possible the employer can also be held criminally liable? Explain your answer.
Employers can be held liable for the actions of employees (Jennings, 2012). Knight was an agent of the University and as such, the University was responsible for any torts that Knight committed while working. As a coach, Knight wa...
Coach Wressel’s strongest arguments will be against SUM, while any arguments against the NCAA will likely fail. The most persuasive claim Wressel could make is a wrongful termination claim against SUM, assuming he is an employee. This claim will assert that SUM breached its contract of employment by firing the coach without cause and without following SUM’s disciplinary proceedings. This claim will entail a detailed, fact specific analysis of the Wressel’s agreement with the SUM. It is possible that the contract of employment includes a provision that allows SUM to terminate Wressel for NCAA rules violations. If so, this claim will fail. If not, Wressel may be able to recoup damages based on his wrongful termination.
What uncompensated work did the plaintiff claim she performed? What should the district court have done with the statement of another employee that the plaintiff did not engage in work prior to her official start time?
Branch uses the example of TCU football player Kent Waldrep who mas paralyzed in a game against the Alabama Crimson Tide. TCU paid for his medical bills for nine months but refused to pay anymore afterwards. Throughout the 1990’s Waldrep pushed for a lawsuit for workers compensation rights. The appeals court finally rejected Waldrep’s claim in 2000, ruling that he was not an employee because he had not paid taxes on financial aid that he could have kept even if he quit football. The case of Ken Waldrep shows the power of the NCAA’s “student-athlete” formulation as a shield, and the organization continues to use it as both a legal defense and a noble ideal. One argument that Branch discusses is the NCAA and its officials. Those who lead the NCAA have tried to assert their dominion by distracting attention from the larger issues. For example, chasing frantically after petty violations. Branch uses the example of A. J. Green, a wide receiver at Georgia. He confessed that he had sold his own jersey from the Independence Bowl, to raise cash for a spring-break
4) Sack, Alan L. “Workers’ Compensation.” Notre Dame Magazine. Spring 1993: 27-32. Sports. Eleanor Goldstein. Vol. 4. Boca Raton: SIRS, 1993. Art. 45.
John Schmidt was taken to the hospital to treat his injured hand. The hospital report shown John suffered from three fingers on his right hand from being sliced up by blades. He underwent surgery to repair the damages fingers. John has a total of 31 stitches in his hand. There is a dispute on who is to blame for the accident. He is now filing a dispute against HDR Architecture Inc. He is interest in filing a claim for workers compensation and wants all his bills covered which include, hospital, doctor visit, medicine, physical therapy, etc. Work compensation is when is employee gets hurt receives “wage replacement benefits, medical treatment, vocational rehabilitation, and other benefits” (Workers' Compensation). If the company cannot meet
Sobocinski, Eric J. "Marquette Sports Law Review." College Athletes? What is Fair Compensation? 7th ser. 7 (1996). Print.
In the world of professional sports there are many criminal acts that are committed both on and off the playing surface. In this section we are going to look at a few cases where criminal acts have occurred.
Medical benefits- pays only for treatment of a work-related injury and illness. An injured worker may receive medical care immediately right after an onset an injury or illness. They can chose from a doctor that is listed as approved through the worker's compensation department. the doctor must approve medical care for an injury or illness for the injured worker, except with an emergency. He or she can receive the care to treat a work-related injury or illness without any limit. The benefits pay for only the treatment of the work-related injury or illness. It does not pay for treatment of other injuries or illnesses and the doctor cannot bill the injured worker by treating him or her with the injury or illness, she or he can bill the worker
Should employers suspect that an employee has made a fraudulent claim, they should notify their worker’s compensation claims administrators. They may do this either by phone, or in person. Employers should provide their claims administrators with the facts of the case as they understand them, the contact information for any witnesses and any other evidence. After an initial report is made, the state’s Department of Industrial Relations advises employers to follow up with a written letter.
Chapter 19. p413. John G.Fleming [4] P419. Textbook on Torts 8th edition. Michael A.Jones [5] Vicarious Liability for Employers. Andrew Scott-Howman.
Sullivan, Kathleen A., Patricia J Lantz. "Leveling the playing field or leaving the players? Section 504, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Interscholastic Sports." The Journal of Special Education (Winter 2000): 258
* Unsportsmanlike conduct can disqualify participants: competitors that drive, cut, and block other athletes; competitors who put obstacles in front of other participants.