Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Non celebrities affected by paparazzi
Freedom of speech amendment
Freedom of speech amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Non celebrities affected by paparazzi
The American paparazzi have been described by celebrities and the news media as scum-of-the-Earth—mean, intrusive scavengers who feast upon other people’s misery (Saltzman par. 4). Imagine taking a walk with your children in a secluded hiking trail. You are trying to enjoy the peace and serenity that the beautiful day brings, but, as fate has it, you are a celebrity. Along with your fame come fans constantly asking for your autograph, people gazing and staring at you, and ultimately causing a scene wherever you go. However, today you found some time alone to enjoy a few moments of solitude or so you thought. Far off in the distance, you see a determined photographer ready to complete his quest of getting some shots that will turn a nice profit for him. As you rush to the car, you tell your kids to hurry. The seconds get shorter and the photographer closes in on his victim: you. His camera flashes in your face. The flickering lights hurt your children’s eyes. The photographers, or more appropriately, the paparazzi were just taking pictures in a public place so were they really breaking any laws? [Add Halley Berry] It has been proven that paparazzi tactics of hunting icons have led to trespassing, behavior constituting assault, and invasion of their targeted celebrity’s privacy (McNamura The paparazzi have gotten out of hand, and their antagonistic behavior, intended or not, should be restricted.
The paparazzi’s first line of defense is not an unfamiliar one in this democratic country of ours. Their battle cry is freedom of the press or freedom of speech (Alach 208). They claim that we as a people have a "right to know."(CITE) The first amendment to the Bill of Rights clearly states, “congress shall make no law prohibiting […] or a...
... middle of paper ...
...azzi Issue." Quill. 86.5 (1998): 42. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Nordhaus, Jamie E. "Celebrities' Rights To Privacy: How Far Should The Paparazzi Be Allowed To Go?" Review Of Litigation. 18.2 (1999): 286-314. Academic Search Premier. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
The Paparazzi Reform Initiative. “Legal.” N.p. N.d. Web. 14 Feb. 2014.
Saltzman, Joe. "Paparazzi To Go." USA Today Magazine. 138.2774 (2009): 25. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Saner, Emine. "Have Celebrities Finally Snapped?" The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 04 May 2009. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
Willis, Keith D. "Paparazzi, Tabloids, And The New Hollywood Press: Can Celebrities Claim A Defensible Publicity Right In Order To Prevent The Media From Following Their Every Move?" Texas Review Of Entertainment & Sports Law. 9.1 (2007): 175-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 Mar. 2014.
The Wasp Women tells the story of Janice Starlin, owner and CEO of a cosmetics company. To bolster her declining sales she enlists the help of recently fired beekeeper Dr. Zinthrop. Zinthrop was fired for experimenting with wasps, specifically enzyme extracts from the royal jelly of a queen wasp. Starlin funds his research it the hopes of creating a formula to slow the aging process, with the condition of Starlin being the human trial. The serums are not working fast enough, so Starlin gives herself extra doses, causing her to shed 20 years rapidly but also to periodically transform into a killer wasp.
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
Bonila, Denise M., and Levy, Beth, Eds. The Power of the Press. H. W. Wilson, 1999.
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
“Posts.” Fame is a dangerous Drug: A Phenomenological Glimpse of Celebrity.” N.p. ,n.d. Web 15. Feb 2014
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
The celebrity is a large reason paparazzi is such a major concern. But, on the same token, so are the public. As subscribers to magazines and newspapers and news channels, all the public are fundamentally fueling and paying the paparazzo to go and photograph celebrities. But the question is if the photos we are viewing are really newsworthy. “When a celebrity is walking down the street after leaving Starbucks, that isn’t newsworthy and shouldn’t be covered” (Burke). That is the dispute. What happens to be newsworthy, and what happens to be pointless information. While the paparazzi may break laws or toe boundaries, they only do it because of supply and demand.
Courts do not always protect the press, if something is published that has no real interest and invades someone’s privacy can be fined for doing so. There are also several tv shows that paramedics or firemen enter a home for a call and a tv crew will follow them, and the people inside have no time or may not be in the condition to give permission to enter and in result there have been many reported cases in which the victim later sued for invasion of privacy.
It is fundamental to the business. Every little detail the public wants to follow, like what and where they are eating, whom they will marry, or what they are doing all day – such a vicious cycle. Sometimes stars want publicity and press, and many of them have opened their lives to the public on social media, or reality shows. However, some of them just want to have a little bit of privacy in their lives when they spend time with their families such as vacations, sexual preferences, etc. What kind of limitations should be applied to the paparazzi?
Nordhaus, J. Celebrities' rights to privacy: How far should the press have to go?. Retrieved from http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/ogandy/c734 resources/celebrities rights - nordhaus.pdf
In addition, if someone was fallowing you, taking pictures and bullying you every day single day, you would instantly report them to the police and they would without a doubt get the stalkers arrested, and they would get a restraining order. But if a celebrity calls the cops saying that there is someone following them and harassing them, no one is willing to protect them, because they are not able to stop the paparazzi for good. It 's like all celebrities are being punished for being rich and successful. Nobody deserves
The celebrities have very little privacy because of the paparazzi. They go to extreme lengths just to get that one picture. They intrude and disrupt special occasions, but they also intrude on day to day things that the celebrities do. They co...
Do we as a society have the right to punish celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity? The perks of illimitable wealth, vacationing all over the world, housekeepers, chefs, being in receipt of freebies from designers, multiple homes in diverse parts of the world, chauffeurs, the finest foods, and all the other perks that come with being a celebrity?
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
Should celebrities have their right to privacy? Before newspapers, television, and the internet, ordinary people were not exposed to endless stories about celebrities. Today however, we are bombarded with information about who is dating whom, where they eat, and what they wear from magazines such as People, Entertainment Weekly, and Star. Also, most ordinary people respect the rights of others to a private life. However, some people are just obsessed to get information out of celebrities. They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life.