Burger King Super Seven Incher Advertisement in Singapore

1070 Words3 Pages

Burger King ‘Super Seven Incher’ – 2009

With the ever growing and competitive world, there is often a need to stand out; both individually and as a company. Hence, advertising budgets have been on a rise. Considering the growing access to media and the soaring number of children that now have access to information, advertising has come under increasing scrutiny.

Back in June 2009, Burger King released a print advertisement in Singapore in promotion of a limited edition sandwich. What seems to be a promotion for a large-sized sandwich turns out to have such an explicit underlying meaning. Slammed as “distasteful” and unappetizing due to its obvious references to fellatio, many people spoke up against the advertisement and asked for it to be taken down. Why, you ask? Let’s take a look. (See Appendix A – Figure 1)

Appendix A: Figure 1

The advertisement in discussion is a print advertisement for a limited time promotion of the ‘Super Seven Incher’. This advertisement was put up at public locations such as the MRT and the Burger King outlets across Singapore – a society known around the world for its well-regulated government controls of social conduct and media. The main purpose of this advertisement was to shock, push boundaries and be the topic of discussion amongst the target audience during the limited time that the sandwich was available for.

At first glance, the image of the “mind-blowing” sandwich near the agape mouth of a wide-eyed, red-lipsticked woman who seemed to be in a ‘spotlight’ accompanied by a suggestive tagline that was outstanding both in typeface and size stating: “It’ll blow your mind away.”

The strong sexual references will only be understood by people with prior knowledge of sexual acts, which leads to...

... middle of paper ...

...be effective as Lauren Kuziner, a spokesperson for Burger King, said in a statement that it has generated positive consumer sales around this limited time product offer in that market through this campaign.

There have been some changes in the images of women. Indeed, a "new women" has emerged in commercials in recent years. She is generally presented as super woman (one that can handle every aspect of her life thanks to her purchase of something), or as the liberated woman, who owes her independence and self-esteem to the products she uses. Unfortunately, these new images may not represent any real improvements in the general attitude but rather may have created a myth of progress, an illusion that reduces complex sociopolitical problems to mundane personal ones.

What’s the ultimate mystery? Why this was even approved for launch in Singapore in the first place.

Open Document