Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How tattoos express who you are
History of tattoos essay
How people react to tattoos sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How tattoos express who you are
Body modifications, with the focus of tattoos, have existed in our society for centuries and the way in which it is perceived has changed somewhat over the years, yet certain dishonors still remain our modern day. Like most body modifications, tattoos are an often misunderstood form of body modification. Despite the stigmas, tattoos have become a unique object of desire to endless diverse groups of people. But are the popular assumptions of tattoos out of sync with the true meaning behind them? Further explanation and exploration of the history will reveal the social and cultural practices of tattooing and the causal connection between the mind and the tattooed body, in addition to providing answers as to why tattoos stimulate uneasiness and curiosity and create a challenge to discursive practices. The term ‘tattoo’ was dubbed after James Cook’s journey to Polynesia in the 18th century (Fisher, 2002). However, it is known that the art of inking or marking one’s body dates all the way back to the Greeks. In fact, the Greek word ‘stigmata’ actually indicated the act of pricking one’s skin with ink (Caplan, 2000). Making connection to the contemporary idea of tattoos in our society, the word ‘stigmata’ was used in terms of the marking of ‘others’, such as felons and slaves. The association of the meaning behind stigmata was later spread to the Romans, who treated this act of marking as a state control mechanism (Caplan, 2000). This also touches on Michel Foucault’s outline on social control in his book Discipline and Punish: “But the body is also directly involved in a political field; power relations have an immediate hold upon it; they invest it, mark it, train it, torture it, force it to carry out tasks, to perform ceremonies, t... ... middle of paper ... ...siderably. From a mark of criminality to an embraced art form, the body modification has represented various expressions of the bearer’s inner self. However, despite the efforts to normalize tattoos in the society, the social stigma of deviance perceived by the larger society still remains deeply etched in the art. It is apparent that the intended message a bearer wants to communicate through a tattoo may not be perceived correctly by others. These motivations behind tattoos are filtered through cultural and historical lenses that often result in unintended perceptions of tattooed bodies. In addition, the attempts of using tattoos to change social conditions often reinforce the very conditions they seek to counter. Though these stigmas and misinterpretations see no sign of fading, tattooing will remain as a powerful vehicle of self-expression and social commentary.
Society has changed in many ways over the years; at one point tattoos were considered unprofessional and disgusting to most people, but today, they are quite common amongst young adults and people who enjoy art. Parents and people of many older generations, sometimes struggle to understand why this new interest in tattoos has been able to consume American culture so quickly. Prior to this boom of interest in tattoos, there were many horror stories that surrounded the subject due to unsanitary tools used and possible diseases a person could catch if a mistake was made. Lois Desocio is one of those adults who has struggled to understand tattoos, especially since her son Alec began to fill his body with them. As Alec’s collection of body art continues
In the beginning of the article, Martin explains that teenagers usually pursue tattoos from an influence or even in an effort to confirm affiliation or identity (Martin, 1). He then compares the standpoints of the adolescents and parents. Adolescents tend to get tattoos or piercings for the look and feel of it, while parents feel that their child receiving a piercing or tattoo as a threat to their authority. Martin expresses how even the simplicity of piercing or tattooing skin can cause strain and arguments in families (Martin, 2). He then introduces his three main sections: Identity and the Adolescent’s Body, Incorporation and Ownership, and The Quest for Permanence. In his first section, Identity and the Adolescent’s Body, Martin explains some reasons as to why adolescents seek receiving something involving such permanence. He conveys how most teenagers seek piercing and tattooing as a refuge from an identity crisis or conflict, which are normal for youth development (Martin, 3). In Martin’s second section, Incorporation and Ownership, he explains how some adolescents receive tattoos after long thought processes; they embrace fantasy and imagination (Martin, 4). Last but not least, The Quest for Permanence. Martin explains how an anchor tattoo could mean something different for everyone. It is impossible to perceive a tattoo and know
Throughout the article, Irwin refers to the idea of tattoos with the common assumptions that were associated with like a low status social class and surrounded by a stigma of lacking sense and basic elegance. Tattoos were often once associated with stereotypes such as “dangerous” outcasts that had often associated with this form of body modification. The phenomenon of tattoos started as a sort of strange and more unique practice (as it wasn’t as common) that was surrounded mostly by stigma. Meaning it was focused around
Attitudes regarding tattoos from college students have positive thoughts about tattooed individuals, and are not concerned about becoming labeled a risk taker if they have or become tattooed (Armstrong et al., 2004b). Young women may use a tattoo to enforce their femininity by getting small images such as flowers, or butterflies (Atkinson, 2002; Bell, 1999). Some people get tattoos as a memorial, but the physical pain of getting a tattoo helps to exercise emotional pain of a loss. Tattoos can represent the diminishing influence of the parents and the growing influence of our peers. Women are more likely than men to be concerned with the pain, risk of disease, and the cost of a tattoo while men are more likely to report religious objections to body art (Forbes, 2001). Those who have one or more tattoos report how long they thought before getting their first tattoo. Among the surveyed tattooed respondents have more than one tattoo. Many people said it took months to decide on their first tattoo that they
Tattoos have been used as a form of decoration on the body of the Egyptian mummies. In fact, tattoos were viewed as a “beautifying operation” to the Typee natives and in Wales they were once a royal fad. There have been many eras to see the tattoo as a prestigious decoration. The Japanese also practiced a form of tattooing that covered their warriors in intimidating designs. But after years of beauty and prestige, what changed the views of people? What made tattoos rebellious and unprofessional?
Many people have been getting tattoos lately. People of all ages have been getting them and from all different backgrounds. On a nice day in just about any public place one can spot a tattoo about every five minutes, from the business man who had a portrait of his daughter put on him to a young girl with a butterfly on her ankle and even people with extensive tattoo coverage. What is even more interesting is the rise in the number of people who are heavily tattooed and that they come from all different backgrounds. Not too long ago tattooing did not experience the popularity in mainstream culture that it does now. The question that must be asked in order to understand this fascination that popular culture has had with tattoos is why people get tattoos.
Even though tattoos are becoming part of culture and socially acceptable, the negative and prejudiced attitudes towards those with body art are still present. Not all tattoos are gang related, and one must note that they have historically been a symbol of someone’s culture or religion. Other tattoos may have just a personal meaning to its owner and was not intended to be offensive. People also do not understand that a tattoo may impede them from pursuing a professional career, regardless of their qualifications. Employers realize that the need to recruit workers from different backgrounds are important in such a competitive workforce, so they provide accommodation by having reasonable dress code policies.
His work has also made it possible for the non-conformists to know that their attitude towards tattoos is shallow and that in the near future, they are likely to also have tattoos because the rebelliousness is growing. The manner in which people have transformed and embraced the tattoo culture is also so strong that any negative comment against tattoos will be offensive to most people in the society. Brooks work has therefore achieved its aim of enabling people to understand that they have conformed to the tattooing culture.
He exercises no control over the nature of his skin or, subsequently, his status. Similarly, individuals are born powerless over gender and race, inherently constrained to the arbitrary boundaries society inscribes upon their skin. Here, “inscription” is metaphorical – it is an intangible, predetermined set of rules and expectations (read “metanarrative”) pressed upon a person’s idea of a “body.” However, “inscription,” as already demonstrated by Frankenstein’s monster, need not always be metaphorical. In some cases, the physical skin itself is manipulated. This paper pinpoints where inscription as metaphor collides with literal inscription: the tattoo. Having in the past been associated with crime and deviance, tattoos often bore their own negative metanarrative. In recent decades, however, large populations of the American middle-class have disassociated tattoos and deviance, instead defining them as a means of expressing individual identity. Postmodern culture has granted freedom to bodily inscription by defining it as, in a sense, undefinable. Pop culture has made a significant contribution to this Postmodern perspective; this paper specifically details how Pedro Almodovar’s film The Skin I Live In and the HBO series Westworld exhibit a separation between bodily inscription and metanarrative. However, while the ambiguity of inscriptions now allows one to attempt an escape from the stigma of past
Tattoos are a controversial subject in the world we live in. The kind of people that get tattoos is now varied to almost all humans regardless of race, religion, or age. What many people fail to understand or realize is how much of an effect a tattoo can have on the rest of your life. The original tattoo stereotypes have faded from what they were many years ago and yet tattoos still have a reputation as for what kind of people get tattoos. There are many reasons as to why people would get a tattoo but there are many reason why you should think before you ink. Our society and the social media today has a huge impact on the tattoo industry. Movie stars and pop singers with many tattoos are posing as role models for our generation and
It isn 't uncommon to see people walking around with tattoos permanently stained on their body. It is also uncommon to know that they usually have a meaning. From Chinese symbols to images devoted to the flying spaghetti monster, people love to keep these tattoos to remind them of a message or a special someone. According to the World Book Advanced Dictionary, a tattoo is "to mark (the skin) with designs or patterns by pricking a line of holes and putting in colors. ' ' And the meaning of an individual 's tattoo can vary depending on where you are. In this essay, I will discuss contrasting elements in prison and in tribal tattoos. This will be done by doing a cross sectional study of their history, meaning and methods. Are prison and tribal tattoos similar or different?
In our society today, body modifications are quite and seen every day without even realizing it. Body modifications are defined as is the deliberate altering of the human anatomy or human physical appearance. These are changes to one’s body on purpose, whether by the individuals own choice or not. Body modifications can be permanent or only temporary, depending on how extreme the alteration is. Tattoos are a type of body modifications that we see quite often our society. Female circumcision is not present in the United States, they are common practices elsewhere in the world as a type of alteration. The reason for different types of modifications are very diverse, but at the same time can be compare in some ways’. The reasons for some practice may depend on one’s culture or just for an individuals’ personal reasons. Common practices to us such as tattoos are somewhat similar to the practice of female circumcision, but are also very different as shown in the presentations, readings, and videos.
The trend of tattooing grew rapidly as a rebellious act in the early 80’s, however, tattooing actually dates back much further. The earliest record of tattoos was discovered back in 1991 on “the frozen remains of the Copper Age Iceman; scientists have named ‘Ötzi.’ His lower back, ankles, knees, and a foot were marked with a series of small lines, made by rubbing powdered charcoal into vertical cuts,” (Barbajosa, 2004). Despite the change in meaning or purpose for receiving a tattoo, it seems that there is sentimental value and the expression of self regardless of how times have changed. Five-thousand years ago, when the Ötzi’s tattoos were discovered, anthropologists perceived the meaning of his tattoos to be a symbol of accomplishment and an earned position in the community or even population. When a young adult turns 18, it’s a rite of passage to receive a tattoo, so the purpose is still there; however, having a purpose for a tattoo does not make it art.
As early as the nineteenth century women were modifying their bodies with tattoos as a way to seek employment; this employment consisted mainly of circus sideshows or “freak shows.” These women were most often regarded as outcasts and rebels and were frequently scorned and ridiculed. “At that time, positive associations with tattoos were limited to upper class women; these women were recognized as brave and noble as well as beautiful” (Hawkes, Senn, and Thorn 594.) There was a resurgence of tattooing in the 1920s and again in the late 1960s and early 1970s which brought not only an increase in the number of women receiving tattoos but also in the number of female tattoo artists. Unlike their predecessors these women were not tattooing their bodies as means to gain employment but as a form of self-expression and rebellion. Yet they still met with discrimination and negative attitudes when it came to their tattoos.
In the USA, various prisoners and criminal packs use unmistakable tattoos to show substances about their criminal past, imprisonment and progressive affiliation. Body art is a sort of correspondence that is as old as mankind itself. Socials far and wide had used tattoos for religious, social and supernatural reasons, expecting a colossal part in setting a culture’s morals and direct plans. Regardless, various people used to relate the Bible, which states “don’t cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo flaws on yourselves.” Some religious feelings are to some degree uncommon. For example, the fundamentalist Christian’s assure that one should not have tattoos since they are a “skeptic