Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Current status of Biological Weapons convention treaty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Biological Weapons Convention treaty also known as the Biological and Weapons Toxin Convention was established in 1972. This treaty was created in the efforts to stop the production of Biological weapons and the use of it in combat. As well as banning the use of its delivery systems and storage facilities. In 1972 over 158 countries came to an agreement and signed the Biological Weapons Convention treaty. Although the treaty was signed in 1972 it did not take effect until 1975. This treaty only affected the countries who actually signed it. A biological agent can be defined as a microorganism that causes disease in human, plants, and animals; it also could cause deterioration of material. Biological Agents can be broken down into two classes, pathogens and toxins. Out of the two classes pathogens is considered to be the most dangerous because it could be a bacteria or a virus that is capable of being transferred from one person to another. Toxins are poisons which can be just as deadly as pathogens when produced and released under the right weather conditions. Biological agents are quite different from chemical agents, although there are many differences; the main difference is the lethality and the onset of symptoms. Biological weapons are capable of producing mass casualties due to its high potency, considerable accessibility, easy delivery, and low visibility. They are also very inexpensive and very easy to produce; it can be easily disseminated among the population. In fact something as simple as a crop sprayer which is used on farms to produce crops could be use as a delivery method. Biological agents could be as small as a kilo gram of anthrax which is capable of killing thousands of people. This amoun... ... middle of paper ... ...In addition to that its members were not fully committed to the agreement. Many nations signed the treaty but yet continued their research and development of biological weapons. The current status of the Biological Weapons Convention treaty has been severely degraded. There have been multiple conferences held over the years with no resolution. The United Nations has failed to come up with protocols that all members can agree upon. Works Cited Croddy A. (2005). “Weapons of Mass Destruction. An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, (Vol. 1, pp. 43-46. Santa Barbara: Eric A. Croddy. Danzig R. (1996). “Commentaries” Vol 278, No. 5. Retrieved from Dire J. (2013). “Biological Warfare Agents” Retrieved from
Libyan Chemical Weapons Proliferation Introduction A legacy of aggression exists between the United States and Libya which pervades every facet of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the non-proliferation arena. The absolute distrust of Revolutionary Leader Colonel Mu'ammar Abu Minyar al-Qadhafi and his government expressed by U.S. officials has prompted the United States to play the role of policing non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, the so-called weapons of mass destruction
due to the deliberate release of pathogens or toxins. Two international treaties outlawed biological weapons in 1925 and 1972. Unfortunately, these treaties have failed to stop countries from conducting offensive weapons research and large-scale production of biological weapons. As our knowledge increases on these disease-causing agents, so does our fear of future threats of biological warfare (Frischknecht, 2003). Biological warfare can be defined as “living organisms or infected material derived
There has been initiatives to stop weapons proliferation through the formations of international laws and organization. One of the groups mentioned earlier is the Chemical Weapon Convention as one of the first efforts to eliminate chemical weapon stockpiles in many developed nations. Now the CWC is under the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons or OPCW. OPCW was a reaction to the growth of chemical weapon stockpiled during the first half of the 20th century. Not only do they want
Biological & Chemical Weapons Chaos, fear, and death. Those three words are what most people’s first thoughts are when they see the destructive offspring of either Biological or Chemical Weapons. These Weapons of Mass Destruction (also known as WMD’s) are actually considered the deadliest weapons of all time to not only humans but also to other animals, and plants. Biological and Chemical Warfare has become a major threat not only to the safety to the people of America, but also on the frontlines
The purpose of this essay is to explain why it will be a problem to explain biological warfare with the SCOT theory, actor-network theory and technological systems theory. Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a theory that was introduced by Weiber Bijker that explains the link between social and technical processes of a technology or artifact. Bjiker argued that technology is shaped by human engineers, market forces, consumer’s needs and demands. In SCOT, technology is a social construction
A) Strict laws against the development and production of nuclear weapons--The possession of biological weapons, chemical weapons, and landmines is prohibited by global treaties to which most states are parties (the Biological Weapons Convention, the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty). The possession of nuclear weapons is prohibited by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). B) Changes in the immigration policies—A large and diverse population makes
Chemical and Biological Weapons Imagine waking up from a good night’s sleep and finding your whole family dead. As you stumble around your house looking for the cause of your family’s death, a strong chemical smell comes over you. It is the stinging smell of chlorine. Everyone agrees no one should have to endure this painful death by chemicals or biological weapons. What most people don’t know is that civilizations have been using this brutal war tactic since the 6th century, in which the Assyrians
Human rights are legally guaranteed by human rights law which protects individuals and groups against actions which hinder fundamental freedoms and human dignity. They are expressed in treaties, customary international law, bodies of principles and other sources of law. International human rights law was established in the nineteenth century when international law developed a teaching under which humanitarian intervention was considered
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 2 When someone says weapons of mass destruction, what comes to your mind? Whether it's nuclear bombs, biological weapons, or dangerous chemicals, they can be inimical and formidable to many people all across the world. The thought of what to do if an attack of this nature were to occur can be horrifying. Learning more about these weapons can help to dispel any angst that you have about your personal safety due to these accoutrements
involves using the toxicity of chemical substances as weapons, primarily in the form of a gas. Chemical warfare is very different from other weapons of mass destruction, or WMD’s. The other weapons under this label are nuclear warfare and biological warfare, which together make up NBC, the military term for nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (OCPW, 2016). Weapons that fall under the WMD category are in no ways similar to conventional weapons, which are used due to their destructive potential
world is filled with a constant threat of Nuclear detonation and the ensuing fallout of such an attack. This Leads to the question would the world be safer without nuclear arms? Nuclear weapon is defined as “A bomb or missile that uses nuclear energy to cause an explosion.” (Oxford Dictionary, 2016) Nuclear weapons are one of the most destructive devices known to man, and as such the masses have cried for their use to be abolished following the Cold War. Two nuclear bombs have ever been dropped during
Even though The Korean peninsula has been occupied for as long as time can tell we will begin to look at the historical context of North Korea in the 1900’s. By 1910, Japan’s colonial rule over Korea was a “brutal experience. [Tensions were high as] resistance groups formed in Korea and China, mostly adopting leftist politics in reaction to the right-wing Japanese administration” (libertyinnorthkorea.org). Before WWII, Korea began to modernize, and Pyongyang developed into a city influenced heavily
Technology in the light of military weaponry has been one of the growingly controversial issues that the world faces today. Among the top weapon types that have advanced greatly over the past recent years are nuclear, chemical and biological weaponry. Though the United States government and military has been enthusiastically involved in the evolution of these weapons, their enthusiasm dwindles when responsibility must be taken for the consequences that result. Consequences that are left unresolved or
The term weapon of mass destruction has been in existence since the 1930’s. Weapons of mass destruction can be better identified as nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons, or radiological weapons. A true definition of weapons of mass destruction is “any destructive device; any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors; any weapon involving a biological
has been hundreds of conventions, where countries gather and discuss possible solutions to the problem. One of the first convections took place at Geneva, Switzerland in 1928 (Danzig). This protocol did not necessarily focus only on bioterrorism but terrorism, in general. It prohibited the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices and the use of bacteriological methods of warfare. There have been also some treaties signed resulting from