The Benefits of Torture

1788 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The ethics of torture

Imagine awaking in the morning, going downstairs and preparing the morning meal. While enjoying the sunshine through the kitchen window along with a chai tea latte, the news on the television suddenly changes from the mundane to chaotic confusion. Disaster has struck! The implausible has just happened and the nation is in chaos. This disaster could happen at any moment and at any point across the globe. If the only method of prevention to this traumatic event is by the skilled technique of information extraction known as torture, would it not be the government’s obligation to the people to ensure this method of prevention was exercised? When considering the threat from extremists, the United States government must allow for the use of unorthodox interrogation methods, such as torture, when lives are on the line and time is of the essence.
A widely popular argument against torture methods in the United States deals with the assumption that terrorists, or any form of enemy combatant that would wield terrorist style attacks, look upon how we as a nation employ torture techniques and attempt to cite it against us while claiming Americans are hypocrites against their own moral standards. They use this technique to then aid and assist them in recruiting newer soldiers or terrorists to their cause against America. This recruitment-tool theory has become something of a mantra in our recent history, including from the President himself. Moreover, as per the norm, it excuses the violent actions of the extremists or terrorists and blames America for the evil that others have done. Terrorists do not need America’s perceived use of torture to hate America. As Richard Cheney asserts in a speech he delivered in July of 2009:
“As a practical ...

... middle of paper ...

...versity of New York Press, 2007. Print.
Brecher, B. Torture and the Ticking Bomb. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007. Print.
Cheney, Richard. “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques: Protecting this Country”. Vital Speeches of the day. July 2009: 297-302. Print.
Dershowitz, Allen. Why Terrorism works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., Inc.: USA, 2002. Print.
Holy Bible. New King James Version. Thomas Nelson: Nashville, 1982. Print.
Merriam-Webster online Dictionary. Merriam-webster.com. n.d. Web.
Posner, Richard. “The Best Offense.” Newrepublic.com. The New Republic. Web. September 2002.
Reuter, Dean and John Yoo. Confronting Terror: 9/11 and the future of American National Security. New York: Encounter Books, 2011. Print.
Wisnewski, Jeremy. Understanding Torture. Cheshire: Edingburgh University Press, 2010. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Torture And Torture In 1984

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some believe that even in the most dire of situations, the act of torturing a prisoner to obtain information is not the most effective or efficient way to glean accurate information about a threat or terrorist group; experts have said that it is actually a very inefficient way to go about this and even that it is only on rare occasions that this results in useful, accurate information. However, there are also those who believe the exact opposite; that the only way to get information from a terrorist, or someone believed to be involved in terrorist activity, is to mentally break them down until they have suffered enough to surrender any information they might know or to the point where they just say whatever is necessary for the “interrogation” to stop, as in 1984.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Alan Dershowitz 'Should The Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured'

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alan Dershowitz challenges the legitimization of non-lethal torture in his essay, “Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist be tortured?” He claims that torture should indeed be legitimized for specific scenarios that require such action. The ticking bomb terrorist gives the example of a terrorist withholding time-sensitive information that could result in the death of innocent citizens, if not shared. Not only does Dershowitz challenge the idea of torture, but he also gives a probable solution that favors the legitimization the torture. He mentions three values that would have to be complied with by all three branches of government if it were to be legitimated, which Dershowitz does endorse. The arguments of the two perspectives discussed in the

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy: The Iran-Contra Affair

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jeffrey David Simon, The Terrorist Trap: America's Experience with Terrorism, 2nd ed. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001), 188-89.

    Read More

  • Boston Marathon Bombings

    1908 Words  | 4 Pages

    Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/268/540 White, J. R. (2014). Terrorism and homeland security (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Read More

  • Irrational Terrorism Essay

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).

    Read More

  • Brian Knappenberger's Hatred For Torture Analysis

    285 Words  | 1 Pages

    Author Brian Knappenberger created this article do to his hatred for torture throughout the United States. Brian Knappenberger is an award-winning documentary filmmaker he has won Writers Guild of America Award for Best Documentary Screenplay.Knappenberger has directed and executive produced numerous other documentaries for the Discovery Channel, Bloomberg, and PBS. He owns and operates Luminant Media, a Los Angeles based production and post-production company. All together Brian Knappenberger show his firm beliefs and is a very intelligent man. Knappenberger is trying to address towards the United States government and citizens to give intel on his own thoughts towards torture. It clearly states how he is against the use of torture and states

    Read More

  • The Torture Myth, by Anne Applebaum

    897 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “The Torture Myth,” Anne Applebaum explores the controversial topic of torture practices, focused primarily in The United States. The article was published on January 12, 2005, inspired by the dramatic increase of tensions between terrorist organizations and The United States. Applebaum explores three equality titillating concepts within the article. Applebaum's questions the actual effectiveness of using torture as a means of obtaining valuable information in urgent times. Applebaum explores the ways in which she feels that the United States’ torture policy ultimately produces negative effects upon the country. Applebaum's final question is if torture is not optimally successful, why so much of society believes it works efficiently.

    Read More

  • Torture Persuasive Essay

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    Torture can prevent the attacks resulting in terror or can go and prove no one, no one can infringe the right of Americans in the result of another attack, and therefore torture is justifiable. The similarities between ISIS and Al Qaeda is scary and torture needs to be in the back pocket of all officials to prevent similar disasters. The clock stopped ticking on 9-11, and anyone on the street can tell oneself where they were the minute they heard. The use of torture could save the lives of thousands, send the message that America is in charge, and can become more commonly accepted in the eyes of disaster. A ticking bomb could be going off at any time, it could destroy a spouse, a son, a daughter, a friend, a neighbor, or maybe the threat is to oneself, torture could get the information to destroy the bomb before it destroys one’s life. Torture is justifiable.

    Read More

  • The Morality of Torture

    1333 Words  | 3 Pages

    The moral issue of torture is one that has come under scrutiny by many national and international organizations as of late. To talk about torture one must really understand what torture is. As taken from Dictionary.com “1.a. Infliction or severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion. b. An instrument or a method for inflicting such pain. 2. Excruciating physical or mental pain; agony. 3. Something causing severe pain or anguish.” This is just the literal meaning of the word but doesn’t entail the great horror that usually accompanies torture. As stated in the “Ticking Bomb” example given on the instruction sheets, “The interrogation won’t be pretty, and the prisoner may never recover. Shall we do whatever is necessary?” On what moral level is bringing a human being to humiliation, unbearable physical and mental abuse, and most of the time an ultimate end ever an acceptable practice? Torture should be as unthinkable as slavery. In principle it is: since World War II, governments the world over have agreed to ban torture without exception, even when at war or facing acts of terrorism. International treaties banning torture and other, inhuman, and degrading practices are among the most widely ratified treaties in existence. It is not just the United States that endorses these practices; it is over 150 counties according to the United Nations expert on torture Theo van Boven. Since the United States has gone to “war on terror” in Afghanistan, the president and other top officials seem to think that we are not actually “at war” rather these detainees are outside the realm of prisoners of war (POW) status and they don’t have rights under the Geneva Conventions. Now governments are returning alleged terrorists or national security suspects to countries where they are at risk of torture or ill treatment. This is just a reminder as to why the U.S. did not join the International Criminal Court because they have the “bad man” mindset knowing that they will or already use these tactics. There are many reasons as to why torture is immoral and three of these such reasons are; torture is an unreliable source of information and can work against a government, torture is illegal under most every nations’ laws, and torture is just plain immoral and that is the reason it is illegal.

    Read More

  • Terrorism and Moral Panic in America

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    Herman, E. & Sullivan, G. O.1989. The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View of Terror. New York: Pantheon.

    Read More

  • Pouring Salt on the Wound

    1326 Words  | 3 Pages

    The notion that fear will make a human leak information is not a novel idea. Torture has widely been used throughout the world by many groups of people. After World War II, The Geneva Convention prohibited any nation from partaking in torture. The emergence of terrorist activity on American soil brought up the question whether torture should be advocated or prohibited from a moral standpoint. The US changed the definition of torture in order to forcibly attain potentially important information from captives. Even though the new clause suggested that many of the methods the US used were now legal, other countries still had an issue in terms of honoring the Geneva Convention and basic human rights. Advocates for torture promise that countless innocent lives can be saved from the information obtained from a single torture victim. Opponents to the advocates suggest that torture often results in misleading information. Morally, torture is not justified as it degrades humans and often leaves victims scarred for life and possibly dead.

    Read More

  • Case For Torture

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during specific situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life circumstances; most are hypothetical situations. His use of theoretical instances is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. But unfortunately, the examples Levin cites are too weak for his argument. These examples include a potential terrorist attack on Manhattan and a hospital robbery. Levin’s position also lacks strength due to its inapplicability to the current world.

    Read More

  • Stereotypes, Discrimination and Prejudice

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    8) ?After the Attack?The War on Terrorism? (2001). Online at: <http://www.monthlyreview.org/1101edit.htm>, consulted on March 29th, 2004.

    Read More

  • Terrorism in the 21st Century

    3445 Words  | 7 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the mindset and the opinion of nearly every American on the one of the most vital issues in the 21st century: terrorism (Hoffman 2). Before one can begin to analyze how the United States should combat such a perverse method of political change, one must first begin to understand what terrorism is, where it is derived from, and why there is terrorism. These issues are essential in America’s analysis of this phenomenon that has revolutionized its foreign policy and changed America’s stance in the world.

    Read More

  • The Methodology of Terrorism

    4279 Words  | 9 Pages

    Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,

    Read More

More about The Benefits of Torture

Open Document