Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
history of photography study guide
history of photography study guide part 2
history of photography study guide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: history of photography study guide
The word “photography” derives from two Greek words: Phos (meaning “light”) and
Graphe (meaning “writing” or “drawing”). Thus, photography implies, literally, “writing
or drawing with light”, in turn implying combination of something that occurs naturally
(light) with practices created by human culture (writing and drawing).
Generally, photographs are understood to have a direct connection to what they depict-
providing the impression that they show “reality”. They are often also seen as being able
to preserve a moment in time. In the course of my paper, I will be exploring such issues
through an analysis of the terms Studium and Punctum that Roland Barthes uses in his
book Camera Lucida (or La Chambre Claire) : Reflections On Photography (1980,
London: Vintage). Barthes’ book, is simultaneously an enquiry into the nature and
essence of photography and a eulogy to his (then) recently deceased mother. Published
two months prior to his own death in 1980, it is one of the most important early academic
books of criticism and theorization on photography, alongwith Susan Sontag’s On
Photography (1979, London: Penguin) (infact, Barthes mentions Sontag’s book in the
original bibliography to Camera Lucida, henceforth referred to as CL). Critics and
commentators, ever since the publication of CL, have felt a morbid sense throughout the
book – it seems as if, for Barthes, photographs and photography have only to do with
death and the past. It is said that he tends to focus on photographs only as memento mori.
Sontag in her book says : “All photographs are memento mori” and that “to take a
photograph is to participate in the person or thing’s mortality, vulnerability, mutability”.
(For quotes from Sont...
... middle of paper ...
...et Me Not: Photography and Remembrance New York: Princeton.
Bazin, Andre (1980) “The Ontology of The Photographic image” in Alan Trachtenberg (ed.) Classic Essays on Photography New Haven : Leete’s Island Books.
Benjamin, Walter (1999) “The Work of Art In The Age of Mechanical Reproducibility” in Illuminations London: Pimlico.
Cartier-Bresson, Henri (1952) The Decisive Moment New York: Simon and Schuster.
Green, David (2006) “Marking Time” in Stillness And Time : Photography and The Moving Image, Brighton : Photoforum
Moriarty, Michael (1991) Roland Barthes Great Britain : Polity Press
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1998) “What is a Sign?” in Selected Philosophical Writings Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
Sontag, Susan (1979) On Photography London: Penguin.
Welch, Edward and Long, J.J. (2009) Photography: Theoretical Snapshots, Abingdon : Routledge
Johnson, Brooks. Photography Speaks: 150 Photographers on their Art.” New York: Aperture Foundation Inc., 2004. Print.
Gustavon, Todd. Camera: A History of Photography from daguerreotype to Digital. New York, NY: Sterling Publishing, 2009
Osborne, Harold. The Oxford Companion to Twentieth Century Art. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
A picture is more than just a piece of time captured within a light-sensitive emulsion, it is an experience one has whose story is told through an enchanting image. I photograph the world in the ways I see it. Every curious angle, vibrant color, and abnormal subject makes me think, and want to spark someone else’s thought process. The photographs in this work were not chosen by me, but by the reactions each image received when looked at. If a photo was merely glanced at or given a casual compliment, then I didn’t feel it was strong enough a work, but if one was to stop somebody, and be studied in curiosity, or question, then the picture was right to be chosen.
Gombrich, Ernst Hans Josef. Art, perception, and reality. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972. Print.
Sontag, Susan. "Essay | Photography Enhances Our Understanding of the World." BookRags. BookRags. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
1. Hunter, Sam and Jacobs, John. Modern Art, 3rd Edition. The Vendome Press, New York, 1992.
Schwartz, Donna. “Objective Representation: Photographs as Facts.” Picturing the Past: Media History & Photography. Ed. Bonnie Brennen, Hanno Hardt. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1999. 158-181.
“Some photographs are destined to be ruined or forgotten. Some photographs are destined to be remembered and cherished. Such as his infamous portrait which almost did not make it.” (1946) Life Magazine.
What is a photograph? The simplicity of taking a photograph leads many to ponder its artistic value. Yet, it is undeniable that there are some photos that cause an emotional reaction deeper than simply observing a recorded point in time. Surely, there are photographs that cause more reaction than some modern art pieces. There seems to be two types of photographs. The first classification is the ‘time capture’ photo – an image with the sole purpose of recording a particular event or point in time. The second nature of a photo carries a ‘deeper meaning,’ which has the ability to change the observer’s mood and cause a reaction. But what distinguishes these two varieties? There are a couple factors. The first is the ability of the photographer to make a photograph of ‘deeper meaning’ out of an obscure or random scene. The second is the capacity of the viewer, whether viewing the photo in a museum or in the privacy of his/her own room, to interpret the image as art. A photo can be classified as art when the thoughts and interpretations of both the photographer and the viewer overlap. In this case, any photo is taken beyond the simple ‘time capture’ classification.
In Sontag’s On Photography, she claims photography limits our understanding of the world. Though Sontag acknowledges “photographs fill in blanks in our mental pictures”, she believes “the camera’s rendering of reality must always hide more than it discloses.” She argues photographs offer merely “a semblance of knowledge” on the real world.
"History of photography and photojournalism.." History of photography and photojournalism.. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. .
This book is a note written by Roland Barthes to record the dialectical way he thought about the eidos(form, essence, type, species) of Photographs. Roland Barthes was a French literary theorist, philosopher, linguist in his lifetime, but surprisingly he was not a photographer. As Barthes had a belief that art works consists with signs and structures, he had investigated semiotics and structuralism. However, through Camera Lucida, he realized the limitation of structuralism and the impression to analyze Photography with only semiotics and structuralism. Barthes concludes with talking about unclassifiable aspects of Photography. I could sense the direction Barthes wanted to go through the first chapter ‘Specialty of the Photograph’. He tried to define something by phenomenology
Photojournalism is a specific form of journalism that employs the use of images to form a news story that meaningfully contributes to the media. This allows a photographer to capture stills that tell the story of a moment in time. Photojournalism creates a transparency between the media and the people as it depicts an accurate representation where meaning can be misinterpreted through text. Photojournalism largely contributes to the way we understand the reality of a moment. Becker (1982) supports this concept as he compares photography to paintings. He says that paintings get their meaning from the painters, collectors, critics, and curators; therefore photographs get their meaning from the way people understand them and use them. Photojournalist’s
Sontag 's claim on taking photos as a defense against anxiety and a tool of power naturally pinpoints the deep rooted motives behind why we take photos along with the power and motive of the photos themselves with simple elo...