Kids Health Website Review Essay

903 Words2 Pages

Review of Kids Health Website The internet is widely used with massive amounts of information at the tips of ones fingers. Kids Health is a website that has been around for almost twenty years. Having four sites in one, with sections for parents, kids, teens, and educators ensures them an audience of all ages and backgrounds. Kids Health, dedicated to providing the audience with wide prospective, factual advice, and comfort on a wide range of physical, emotional, and behavioral issues affecting children and teens (Health, 2012). Kids Health’s knowledge about ADHD is what will be under review seeing as how it is a growing concern in our young people. With such an extensive audience and an emotional topic, this website needs to be current, accurate, …show more content…

Was this written years ago and then abandoned? Does Kids Health’s information coincide with credible information, such as knowledge the audience may know about ADHD or could find through known credible resources? If one looks at the end of the article on the Kids Health site, they would see that the particular article in question was reviewed in January 2010 that is recent enough to feel like one is getting current information. If one would like to broaden their knowledge on the currency of the site than they can click on the “about Kids Health” link at the bottom of the page. There they will find the following statement, “Ongoing, scheduled medical reviews ensure that the information is as up-to-date as possible (Health, 2012).” Now one knows the site is current but more research is necessary to see if the information given is …show more content…

To begin with, the information found on the site is free to the audience, complete, and comprehensive. The question now is whether the site is based on fact. Kids Health informs the audience that, “Kids with ADHD act without thinking, are hyperactive, and have trouble focusing. They may understand what's expected of them but have trouble following through because they can't sit still, pay attention, or attend to details” (Health, 2012). To see if they have covered their definition properly one must compare it to a known credible reference. “The concise Corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science defines ADHD as, a disorder normally characterized by persistent and continuing inattention and/or excessive motor restlessness and thoughtless behavior (Adhd (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), 2004). As one can see, when compared to a credible source the website has credible coverage. Maybe one is wondering about another statement of fact made on the site that may not be such a wildly known fact. Will a statement like that prove proper coverage also? The Kids Health’s site states that, “ADHD is not caused by poor parenting, too much sugar, or vaccines” (Health, 2012). One can go to the CDC site, which is a government organization, a proven credible resource, and find the following factual statement, “Research does not support the popularly held views that ADHD is caused by eating

Open Document