Assisted Suicide If one should oblige to the demands of his or her aging parents of concluding their lives once they is no tangible optimism for recuperation is a major debate in the world today. Do individuals have to respect their parents’ requests and end life support or any other medical support should they have no optimism for recovery? The reply to these queries is hinged on what the individual considers. Concluding a person’s existence by way of mercy-killing is murder in the practical logic, however people become over-involved in their aging parents despair, aches and distress, that many believe that by liberating them it would be the best thing. For anti-assisted suicide advocates, they perceive it as an apparent indication of murder. When analysing Susan Wolf’s article (2008) an individual would notice the grief in the expressions of the writer and the encounters that she met. In a personal approach, it is difficult not to be sympathetic of her that she had to gradually observe her father die. Personally, I have considered the wishes that I desire for at the time, my demise sets in, and the manner I would desire to pass on or cope with a terminal condition for example cancer. If I were to die, it would be best to rather be within my own conditions. Assisted suicide is, whilst not ethical, it is recurrently more probable to be an option an individual would prefer and not a predicament that is propelled upon them. The article is an extremely touching piece that it made me discover more concerning assisted suicide through researching literature on the same. Dogmatically God crafted the world in six days; the first five days he made the sky, earth and flora, the solar system, t... ... middle of paper ... ... single one who can make decisions for their personal existence and demise and there should be no one else to inform them otherwise. Conversely, that does not signify that a healthcare professional should be involved. It is additionally significant that the individual is at ease and content with how they feel. If one feels that one desires to die then one is at liberty to that option, nevertheless, it is still up to one if one desires to actually die or if one merely desires the hurting to stop. References Batlle, J. C. (2003) “Legal Status of Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Journal of American Medicine. 278.19, Wolf, Susan. (2008, Sep/Oct). Confronting Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: My Father's Death. Hastings Center Report. 38(5), 23-26. Retrieved from EBSCO Host Database located at the Ashford Online Library
The purpose of this article was to inform readers of the thoughts and feelings of patients, families, and physicians. This article informs others of what is really in the thoughts of people going through physician assisted suicide. The audience can be anyone from other physicians to patients and families or anyone who wants to read about this topic. This article can help explain why physician assisted suicide has more positive than negatives. It helps to explain the thought process and feelings of someone who had to really consider this as an option.
Dworkin, Gerald. " The Nature of Medicine." Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: For and Against. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Velasquez, Manuel, Andre, Claire “Assisted Suicide A Right or Wrong.” Santa Clara university n.d. web 24 March 2012
gotten to the point where they feel as if there is no point in living.
When patients suffering from serious health conditions are towards the end of their lives, they are given an option that can change their lives and the lives of those around them. This option is praised as an act of preserving dignity, but also condemned as an act of weakness. The terminally ill, as well as the disabled and the elderly, are given the choice to end their lives by the method of suicide involving the assistance of a physician. For several years, this method has been under debate on whether this option is ethical or unethical. Not only is this defective option unethical, but it puts ill and elderly patients under pressures that can lead to them choosing this alternative rather than the fighting for their lives.
distant cousin of euthanasia, in which a person wishes to commit suicide. feels unable to perform the act alone because of a physical disability or lack of knowledge about the most effective means. An individual who assists a suicide victim in accomplishing that goal may or may not be held responsible for. the death, depending on local laws. There is a distinct difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. This paper targets euthanasia; pros and cons. not to be assisted in suicide. & nbsp; Thesis Argument That Euthanasia Should Be Accepted & nbsp;
With the growing debate on the legality of physician assisted suicide happening in the United States,it is important for everyone to know the position that are being advocated. Having a full sense of knowledge on the conversation taking place gives people who are interested on this topic the necessary tool to draw their own conclusion on how they should feel on this particular issue. Even if someone is not interested in this topic on a cultural level, they should in a personal sense because it might affect their family or themselves one day. In a way this issue and debate affects everyone because there might be a possibility that we acquire a terminal illness, and when this happen we are either denied the option of PAS or granted that option, depending the status of it.
One of the greatest dangers facing chronic and terminally ill patients is the grey area regarding PAS. In the Netherlands, there are strict criteria for the practice of PAS. Despite such stringencies, the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (1992) found 28% of the PAS cases in the Netherlands did not meet the criteria. The evidence suggests some of the patient’s lives may have ended prematurely or involuntarily. This problem can be addressed via advance directives. These directives would be written by competent individuals explaining their decision to be aided in dying when they are no longer capable of making medical decisions. These interpretations are largely defined by ones morals, understanding of ethics, individual attitudes, religious and cultural values.
Peck, M. Scott. Denial of the Soul: Spiritual and Medical Perspectives on Euthanasia and Mortality. New York: Harmony, 1997. Print.
The approach of physician-assisted suicide respects an individual’s need for personal dignity. It does not force the terminally ill patient to linger hopelessly, and helplessly, often at great cost to their psyche. It drive’s people mad knowing they are going to die in a short period of time, suffering while they wait in a hospital bed.
"Assisted Suicide: Finding Common Ground." Lois Snyder, JD; and Authur L. Caplan, PhD. Annals of Internal Medicine. March 21, 2000. v.132, n.6
Cotton, Paul. "Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal And Precarious In Assisted Suicide Debate." The Journal of the American Association 1 Feb. 1995: 363-64.
Assisted suicide is an ethical topic that brings about much debate. Assisted suicide, or euthanasia, is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease or an irreversible coma. Assisted suicide still is a controversial subject in today’s society. In Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez’s article, Assisted Suicide: A Right or A Wrong?, both authors give reasons for and against assisted suicide using deontology and utilitarianism. The two authors, Andre and Velasquez, explain the duties and obligations of assisting death, and preserving life. Through the analysis of Andre and Velasquez’s article, and the evaluation of assisted suicide in terms of deontology and utilitarianism, it will be argued that assisted suicide is justifiable and morally right.
Some consider it to be on the same continuum as palliative care, but palliative care seeks to neither postpone nor hasten the end of life in terminal patients. Aggressive pain management can eliminate or minimize patient suffering. A tremendous discrepancy can exist as to what constitutes “quality of life.” The quality of life that so many argue in favor of is not always measurable and should not apply to human beings. People are becoming comfortable with the idea that life must have a certain quality to be worth living. A life which would be considered unbearable to some can be considered a wrongful life, often discriminating against disabled persons. Suicide is not reversible. Patients cannot change their minds if conditions change. Illness or disability is not convenient for families or physicians, and certainly not for the patient, but arguing in favor of assisted suicide ignores the patient’s real fears of abandonment, pain, rejection, loneliness, and loss of value. If we allow the quality-of-life argument to permeate all levels of medicine and ethics, we ignore the sanctity of life. Even if one rejects the idea that life is a God-given gift, the intrinsic value of every life can still be argued. With the appropriate euphemisms, any killing can be justified, but this slippery slope, this sliding scale of who lives and who dies, puts all of us in the crosshairs of euthanasia, not just the elderly, the infirm, or the
Focus on the Family Issue Analysts. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Focus on the Family. 2008. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'.