Comparing Native Son And Black Boy

887 Words2 Pages

Critiques on Native Son and Black Boy

Bigger has no discernible relationship to himself, to his own

life, to his own people, nor to any, other people- in this respect,

perhaps, he is most American- and his force comes not from his

significance as a social (or anti-social) unit, but from his

significance as the incarnation of a myth. It is remarkable that,

though we follow him step by step from the tenement room to the

death cell, we know as little about him when this journey is ended

as we did when it began; and, what is even more remarkable, we know

almost …show more content…

Continually the world is transformed into a kind of massive skull, and

the people are figments of that skull's imagination.

-Dan McCall, The Example of Richard Wright, 1969

-

ON MAX'S SPEECH

But Max represents the type of so-called legal defense which the

Communist Party and the I.L.D. have been fighting, dating from

Scottsboro. Some of his speech is mystical, unconvincing, and

expresses the point of view held not by the Communists but by those

reformist betrayers who are being displaced by the Communists. He

accepts the idea that Negroes have a criminal psychology as the book

erroneously tends to symbolize in Bigger. He does not challenge the

false charge of rape against Bigger, though Bigger did not rape

Mary, and though this is the eternal bourbon slander flung against

Negroes. He does not deal with the heinous murder of Bessie, …show more content…

-Ben Davis, Jr., Sunday Worker, April 14, 1940,

reprinted in Richard Wright: The Critical Reception, 1978

-

Max, in his image of the American people proceeding to their doom

like sleepwalkers, catches up these images of darkness present on

all sides. It is this blindness that he emphasizes throughout his

speech. If the judge reacts only to what he has to say about the

sufferings of Negroes, he states, he will be "blinded" by a feeling

that will prevent him from perceiving reality and acting

accordingly. "Rather, I plead with you to see... an existence of men

growing out of the soil prepared by the collective but blind will of a

hundred million people" (p. 328). "Your Honor," he exclaims, "in our

blindness we have so contrived and ordered the lives of men" (p.

336) that their every human aspiration constitutes a threat to

Open Document