Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
thesis on Shakespeare Tempest
the tempest characters essays
Shakespeare art of characterisation in the tempest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: thesis on Shakespeare Tempest
Tempest: Is Prospero Good or Evil?
To be able to answer this question we must first understand why Prospero can be seen as good or evil. It is fair to say that Prospero is a main protagonist to the plot of Shakespeare’s Tempest. It is due to Prospero's role as a key figure in the play that has put him under so much scrutiny. Many different Shakespearean critics have their own view of Prospero and those that read or see the play also have their own opinion of the way in which Prospero may be seen.
To be able to support either argument there must be evidence that backs-up each of the analysis of Prospero's character and why he is seen in such a way.
Having been usurped and wrecked on an Island Prospero and his young daughter Miranda have to settle. It is here in Prospero's past that it first clear to see where any confusion about his character may appear. As a learned and powerful man Prospero is able to take direct control of the island, he frees a trapped and tortured spirit (Ariel) and befriends the inhabitants (Caliban). Prospero 'helps' Caliban, he tries to educate him and teaches him to communicate, in exchange Caliban helps Prospero to survive on the Island. But in taking power of the Island Prospero is committing the same act that happened to him as Duke of Milan, now Prospero himself has become the usurper. In this act of goodness Prospero has unknowingly shown his evil side.
Prospero having been trapped on the Island with his daughter has bring her up alone. He tries to do this in as fair a way as he sees possible teaching her right from wrong and educating her in the ways of the world,
however Prospero does not inform Miranda of their past until Miranda, he feels is old enough to understand.
'Thy father was Duke of Milan and a Prince of power' (A1 Sc2 Ln57)
But with Prospero informing Miranda of this at such a late stage in her life is this Prospero as a control freak only allowing his daughter Miranda to know the truth when he feels it is time or is it Prospero being caring keeping this information from Miranda until she is of an age when she can fully understand who she is and where she came from?, again it is not clear to see if Prospero's intentions are for his own good or the good of his daughter.
Cushing syndrome was named after Harvey Cushing in 1912. “Harvey Cushing first described the symptom complex of obesity, diabetes, hirsutism, and adrenal hyperplasia. He gave a vivid description of his first patient who was 23 years old and presented with the “most extraordinary appearance”” (“Osler’s phenomenon”: misdiagnosing Cushing’s syndrome; Postgraduate Medical Journal; October 2003). Although, Sir William Osier was the first to describe the symptoms of Cushing’s, but diagnosed his patient with myxoedema by mistake. Unfortunately many people were misdiagnosed, therefore, leading to mortality. In 1933, Cushing performed his first neurosurgery on his patient, which did not gain acceptance until much later. “Adrenal surgery was for many years the treatment of hypercorticism but prior to the availability of glucocorticosteroids substitution an extremely perilous undertaking” (Cushing’s syndrome: Historical Aspects, Lindholm J., October 2000).
In the comedic, yet thrilling play, The Tempest, William Shakespeare uses characters such as Caliban, Alonso, and Ariel to show Prospero’s immense cruelness and pure monstrosity. Moreover, these Shakespearean characters are also used to highlight Prospero’s change in character into a kinder and more forgiving person. Prospero starts the play out as a vengeful monster, after an illuminating moment however, his persona transforms into his true identity of a compassionate man.
From the moment that the curtain rises, Waiting for Godot assumes an unmistakably absurdist identity. On the surface, little about the plot of the play seems to suggest that the actions seen on stage could or would ever happen. At the very least, the process of waiting hardly seems like an ideal focus of an engaging and entertaining production. Yet it is precisely for this reason that Beckett’s tale of two men, whose only discernable goal in life is to wait for a man known simply as Godot, is able to connect with the audience’s emotions so effectivel...
Willy Loman is a 60 year old senile salesman who desperately wants to be a successful salesman; however, his ideas about the ways in which one goes about achieving this are very much misguided, just as his morals are. He believes that popularity and good looks are the key to achieving the American dream, rather than hard work and dedication. He not only lives his entire life by this code, but instills his delusional beliefs in his two sons Biff and Happy. As a result, his sons experience similar failures in their adult lives. Willy led a life of illusion, lies and regret which not only ruined his life, but gad a negative impact on the lives of family as well.
relaxed and indicated that she had no pain prior to her discharge to the ward.
Eventually, after one more argument, Higgins is again in control of the situation, and he tells Eliza that he thinks she will come back. He feels rather satisfied, thinking he won the bet and she would not leave. In his opinion, the fact that he was right stands proof of how good of a teacher he is.
Prospero’s Abuse of Power in The Tempest. In William Shakespeare's The Tempest, Prospero lives with his daughter Miranda on a deserted island. On the surface, he appears to be a benevolent leader doing his best to protect and care for the inhabitants of the island, especially for Miranda. On closer inspection, however, Prospero plays God, controlling and creating each individual to fit the mold he desires.
...ith the lack of closure the author has paved many paths, making one unable to give a proper retelling of the play due to various interpretations. The play has also slyly inserted a philosophy on human life, the uncertainty and how it is a major part of human life is portrayed through this play. All these characteristic together make this play a very good play, it makes one want to live forever as to see what future generations would interpret the play as. In conclusion, this text is written to make the readers think and participate as active members in the reading of the play.
Samuel Beckett, the recipient of the Nobel Prize in Literature 1969 , was the Irish playwright of the well-known absurdist play, Waiting for Godot. This tragicomedy, being one of the most popular written in the 20th century, was translated from French to English by Beckett himself and has only two acts. As the title insinuates, this stupendous piece of work is based on two friends’ endless wait for someone named Godot. Beckett’s portrayal of one mute and three dynamic characters, out of six, restricts a ground for foreshadowing to some extent and makes it even more difficult for the audience to make sense of the plot, wherein the characters’ lives seem to be meaningless. Additionally, the protagonists, Vladimir and Estragon repeatedly talk of and question each other about parting one another but never do and to be more specific, Estragon shows a greater dependency towards Vladimir. His choice to go back and remain with Vladimir is what adds meaning to his life because on his own, he could literally end up dying so this choice of his is what creates a purpose to his life in the absurd and meaningless world and this choice leads to the whole ‘wait’ for Godot in this drama.
Death of a Salesman is a 1949 play by Arthur Miller, his most famous and commonly revived work. Viewed by many as a caustic attack on the American Dream of success through economic enterprise, it made both Arthur Miller and lead character Willy Loman household names. It was greeted with enthusiastic reviews, received the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1949, the 1949 Tony Award for Best Play, and turned Miller into a national sensation as a playwright.
Literature is one of the forms of art that has had a major impact on the development of society. It is a direct reflection of our society because it portrays great depth of humanism and existentialism. It shows us something we haven’t experienced before and the lives of other people at different places and times. We discover and gain opportunities to deepen our understanding of individual lives and the human condition as we interpret our own emotions and thoughts into the literature work. One of literature works that deals with the same concerns about human condition is Samuel Beckett’s play, Waiting for Godot. The play was first premiered more than sixty years ago but is still being performed today because it is relevant to our modern society.
Humans spend their lives searching and creating meaning to their lives, Beckett, however, takes a stand against this way of living in his novel ‘Waiting for Godot’. He questions this ideal of wasting our lives by searching for a reason for our existence when there is not one to find. In his play, he showcases this ideology through a simplistic and absence of setting and repetitious dialogue. Beckett’s ability to use these key features are imperative to his ability of conveying his message of human entrapment and existence.
"Waiting for Godot" represents one of Samuel Beckett's most popular pieces of work. It was firstly published in French in 1948, but after that Beckett translated it into English. It is a tragicomedy in two acts, illustrating the following characters: Vladimir, Estragon, Pozzo and Lucky, representative characters for the human behaviour, Godot, the divine power, and the Boy, Godot's servant. This play pictures in symbolic terms the human condition and help the reader understand the sequence of events of his life and suggests the fact that human life is determined by chance.
The theme of futility is further reflected in the cyclical nature of the dialogue in the sense that nothing appears to change and everything is simply repeated, their conversation never reached a definitive conclusion they are ultimately still ‘waiting for Godot’ and longing for answers. The concept of time is used very successfully by Beckett in order to highlight and develop the theme of futility in ‘Waiting for Godot.’ Time can be seen as a very fluid concept in the sense that the audience is never made aware of how l...
Although Samuel Beckett's tragicomedy, Waiting for Godot, has no definite meaning or interpretation, the play acts as a statement of hopelessness regarding human existence. Debate surrounds the play because, due to its simplicity, almost any interpretation is valid. The main characters, Vladimir and Estragon, are aging men who must wait for a person, being, or object named Godot, but this entity never appears to grace the men with this presence. Both characters essentially demonstrate how one must go through life when hope is nonexistent as they pointlessly attempt to entertain themselves with glum conversation in front of a solitary tree. The Theater of the Absurd, a prevalent movement associated with Waiting for Godot, serves as the basis for the message of hopelessness in his main characters. Samuel Beckett's iconic Waiting for Godot and his perception of the characteristics and influence of the Theater of the Absurd illustrate the pointlessness and hopelessness regarding existence. In the play, boredom is mistaken for hopelessness because the men have nothing to do, as they attempt to occupy themselves as, for some reason, they need to wait for Godot. No hope is present throughout the two-act play with little for Estragon and Vladimir to occupy their time while they, as the title indicates, wait for Godot.