Gun Control - There are No Bad Guns
I say all guns are good guns. There are no bad guns. I say the
whole nation should be an armed nation. Period.@ This rather bold
statement was made by Joseph Foss. Former Governor Joseph Foss, a former
fighter pilot for the US Air Force, is the current President of the NRA, or
National Rifle Association (Lacayo 16). The NRA is a special interest
group known by many. Its members are stereotyped to be a group of >truck-
driving=, pompous, huntsmen. Indeed this is partially true, as 97% of all
NRA members are suburban men. Because the organization is a more >Domestic
Blend=, it is a surprising fact that the NRA is a powerful lobbyist
organization. And skeptically viewed upon by many people (Lacayo 19). As
a lobbyist organization, the NRA has a current main objective of protecting
American citizens= rights, to possess and operate a firearm, form being
violated by gun control laws. One of the NRA=s main weapons in this
crusade is the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of
America.
The amendment=s translation in the eyes of the NRA and many
American citizens, clearly protects the individual rights of all citizens
to possess and operate firearms. This would easily make any and all gun
control laws unconstitutional. And therefore illegal. This translation,
however, is not accepted by all people. Including the United States
Government. They believe that the amendment guaranteed no right for
individual citizens to possess weaponry, but merely allowed for the
government to form and maintain an armed service (IE. United States Army,
US. Navy). Because of the different translations of our constitution, gun
control can be viewed by different people in different ways (Lacayo 20).
Some of the many gun control bans and laws wich are under constant hellfire
from the NRA are those pertaining to self-defense. Under current laws,
like those of Texas, require that people MUST retreat and be pursued by the
intruder before any means of force could be taken upon the would-be
attacker. Unfortunately, arguments of >criminal=s rights=, and >excessive
force=, put to rest thoughts of a possible veto of some bans. With some
effort from anti-gun control groups, such as the NRA, some of these laws
have been lifted. Also, laws pertaining to self-defense and property
protection have come to be passed as well. Some laws also help to protect
homeowners form civil suites made by wounded would-be attackers/intruders
(Ward F3).
Another example of unwanted (and unneeded) gun violence restriction
laws, was the famous AK-47 crisis. Due to governmental handgun bans, the
military issue AK-47 became easily accessible, due to the extended barrel,
wich allowed the assault weapon to fall under more lenient gun bans. The
weapon quickly became a favorite weapon of thieves and one which created
many a drive-by-shooting victim. In one such case, an AK-47 was used in
the massacre of many school children. The rifle had been attained legally.
One can begin to wonder just how many of these violent crimes could have
been prevented by a self-defense weapon. The attacks by the automatic
assault weapon eventually led to more strict assault weapon bans (Hancock
C2). Nevertheless, the percentile of assault weapons related to violent
crimes has in facet decreased only a minuscule amount. Wich tends to lead
experts to believe that many assault weapon related crimes were done with
illegal weapons. After all, it would be somewhat illogical of people to
commit crimes wich were easily traced back to them by means of a simple
background check of assault weapon owners (Hancock C2).
It should be noted,
that not all forms of gun control are intolerable. 73% of the 70 million
gun owners in America declared that mandatory gun registration exist. 87%
of the voters stated that background checks be required (Lacayo 17). One
form of gun control wich was very minutely argued, was the AToys for Guns@,
incentive. The incentive allowed for $100 in toys, to be given to anyone
who turns in a weapon. It was viewed as a safe way to get guns off the
street. It was, however, considered an unsuccessful action. The guns
recovered were not considered to be those that were being used in violent
crime (the weapons the incentive was aimed at). Only 317 weapons were
recovered. I personally was surprised that >entrapment= wasn=t called on
this one (Silvers C11).
The past few actions were relatively unopposed by
the NRA. As they were not active attempts to restrict the individual
rights of firearm possession. The acts below however, are examples of
>undesired= gun control methods. In recent years, councilmen passed acts
to limit weaponry. New restrictions not only allowed for the sale of
personal weaponry to be sold further (in an attempt to keep firearm levels
at a constant), but also to have particular weapons to be collected from
homes, and removed from the city and destroyed (Spielman C1).
Transportation of weaponry also came under fire. Firearms could not be
brought to gun stores or clubs, unless the weapons were disassembled and
made inoperable. Any vehicle containing a weapon was immediately seized,
and searched. Available to the owner again only after severe penalties
were paid (Speilman C1). Some bills wich had been attempted to have been
passed called for the forbiddance of sale of firearms to known gang members.
And also called for the right to search for weapons on the persons of
anyone who was loitering. Through some effort of anti-gun control
campaigns and petitions, the bills were vetoed (Spielman C1).
Although the
ban of guns and gun related items will indeed help to lower violent crime,
it can also lead to an increase. If a criminal with an illegally attained
firearm goes and attempts a violent crime, with the reassurance of his own
health because the person he intended to injure would not be able to defend
themselves...Then the crime would more likely be more violent. By taking
guns away from the people, you take away some of the defense that person
has for his or her family, property, and life. Self-defense is a great
cause for the purchase of a weapon. In the run-around of gun control laws
between the NRA, and Mr. Brady, it begins to seem as if the issue is no
longer as important as who wins. I believe that common sense should be
used more in these issues, instead of statistics. There is no
parenthetical reference for this paragraph, as it is my opinion. Guns were
invented hundreds of years ago. The purpose of the weapons were to allow a
small man to be as powerful as a big man. They were built to protect the
weak from the strong. Guns restriction merely allows the stronger to
conquer the weak, as was done in the day of the sword and spear (Peterson
10). I should hope we live in a more sophisticated time.
WORKS CITED
Ward, Mike. AProposals Give More Leeway for Self-Defense.@ Austin America
-Standard 7 Mar.1995 :F3.
Hancock, David. AHandgun Is Harder To Buy Than AK-47.@ Miami Herald 24 Jul.
1992: C2-C3.
Peterson, Harold L. A History of Firearms. New York: Charles Scribner=s
sons, 1961.
Lacayo, Richard. AWho is the NRA?@ Time-The Weekly Magazine 29 Jan. 1990:
16-24.
Speilman, Fran. ACouncil Approves Tougher Gun Laws.@ Chicago Sun Times 8
Jul. 1992: C1.
Silvers, Susan. ALandmark Norwalk Kids Store Offers Toys-for-Guns
Incentive.@ Connecticut Post 30 Dec. 1993: G11.
Travers, Bridget. World of Invention. Detroit: Gale Research Inc. 1994.Partner sites: Rottweiler, Spanish immersion program Spain, and Free Death of a Salesman Essays