Free Essays brought to you by 123HelpMe.com



The Traits of Society in 1984

 

In the novel "1984", by George Orwell, an interesting, thought-provoking

scenario is created for the reader to ponder. The totalitarian government

which ruled this oppressive world controlled every aspect of the citizens who

resided there. Living in a society with limited freedom of expression is not,

in any case, enjoyable. Communication, personal beliefs, and individual

loyalty to the government are all controlled by the inner Party in several

ways. Thought, speech and actions are all monitored by political officials in

one way or another.

 

Newspeak is a modified version of language that is enforced upon the people

in order to limit their expression. Syme and Winston, two middle-class

workers in Oceania, discuss the concept of Newspeak.  Syme reveals that he

supports the system, demonstrating how he has been brainwashed by the Inner

Party who enforces the system.  "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of

words...  You haven't a real appreciation for Newspeak, Winston...  Don't you

see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought" (Orwell

46).

 

The Thought Police are a group of devout followers that spy on people, and

determine whether or not they are thinking negative thoughts or have a desire

to overthrow the Party. If so, they are accused of thought crime, and the

punishment is death, either by hanging (a public display, used to keep the

general population afraid, and in line) or parting with your life and being

in a dark, dank room while being tortured by a Thought Police official. In

either case, the outcome is not a positive one, and the Party's effectiveness

is rather surprising. Nary an individual dare to commit thought crime, and to

find someone that did (like Winston) was a true rarity.

 

The Party also used electronic devices to keep tabs on the inhabitants of

their kingdom. Similar to a typical television, the "telescreens", as they

were called were like cameras, watching every move made by any one at any

time. It was uncertain whether party officials could watch everyone, at every

time, but out of fright, citizens assumed they could. The aforementioned

deaths were feared and dreaded by everyone (and rightfully so), therefore,

the assumption was generally made that "yes, you were being watched". In the

end, a hidden telescreen led to the downfall of Julia and Winston. The two

lovers were "caught with their clothes off", so to speak and fell victim to

the merciless machine that ruled them.

 

Fortunately, a fine line exists between the free, democratic society under

which we live, and the closed-minded, totalitarian regime that fictionally

existed here. Today's people are much more intelligent, free-minded, and

aware of their surroundings to fall victim to such a terrible, controlling

trap. We like to maintain that assumption, anyway; we must believe it to

continue with our daily activities and lives. Fortunately for us, that's the

way it is, and Orwell's novel was just fiction, which we can put down at any

time, look around and feel assured that we are free and safe. Unless, we

really are being watched?

 

Partner sites: Spanish school Costa Rica, Skin Cancer, and Free Essays and Term Papers