Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal investigation case studies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Article Evaluative Critique
In this short essay Bill Daly begins by telling us that he will be assessing arguments to keep marine parks open and he will be point out reasons why they actually don’t carry any weight. The overall conclusion that daily made in this essay was that marine parks should no longer be kept open because they are useless and in some ways can be considered to be animal cruelty or no new animals should be captured for their uses. In the essay I found that there were four major premises that can clearly be found. The first major premises can be found in the second paragraph, where it says that ‘there are many more locations where the marine life can be found naturally compared to marine parks’ (Bill Daly, para 2). The second premise was located in the third paragraph, where the Daly tells us the ‘by moving the marine life out of its natural habitat we are affecting their behaviour and making any research that is conducted on them unreliable when it comes to their natural behaviour’ (para 3). The third major premise that I found was in the fourth paragraph, where it says that the ‘parks could be considered tourist attractions but a majority of tourists come to see wildlife in its natural habitat and not in cages’ (para 4). The fourth and final premise that I found was in the fifth paragraph, in this paragraph Daly says that ‘the parks can be cruel to the animals they hold because they put a restriction the freedom they would normally have in the wild’ (para 5). In the end I believe that Daly has created a good inductive argument against the use and creation of marine parks.
I believe this essay created an inductive argument, since the Daly provided evidence that helped support the conclusion by making it probab...
... middle of paper ...
...atural habitat and not in cages’ (para 4).
P4: ‘The parks can be cruel to the animals they hold because they put a restriction the freedom they would normally have in the wild’ (para 5).
P5: ‘It would be more convenient for Australians to visit nearby natural locations compared to the parks in the gold coast, (para 2).
P6: ‘The animals behaviour and natural instinct changes in a marine park compared to in its natural habitat’ (para 3).
P7: ‘Tourists can see caged animals in their home country’ (para 4).
P8: ‘Animals that are used to roaming long distances on the open sea are confined to small cage like areas’ (para 5).
P9: ‘The concrete containers sometimes create problems in communication and cause them to go insane’ (para 5).
C: ‘Marine parks are unneeded and cruel animals, thus need to be shut down or no more animal should be captured for their use’ (para 6).
The experiments on the caged animals are unproductive because when the animals are caged, their natural habits and behavior changes (Jones, 1991). Most of the Australians like to see creatures roaming and playing in their natural habitat. The same thing goes for the international visitors. They do not come to Australia to see captive animals, rather they want to see the real natural beauty and diversity of Australia in the wild environment. If the marine parks are not closed, then Australia will lose its tourist attraction. Moreover, these marine parks capture several important animals like dolphins and make them detached from their natural and normal habitat. They are kept in such an atmosphere that is not at all acceptable at any cost. If a human being loses his house, his relatives, and his society then he becomes destroyed. The same thing goes for these animals. Therefore, this is a clear violation of ethical norms. These marine parks offer only a handful of benefits, and a long list of disadvantages that can affect every part of the society, economy, ethics and environment. Thus, Daly's claim seems to be relevant and
In February of 2010, a woman named Dawn Brancheau died while working as an animal trainer at SeaWorld in Orlando, Florida. There has been a large amount of debate about the circumstances surrounding her death—some say she slipped and fell, while others say that she was dragged in by one of the orcas, Tilikum. The controversy over her tragic death brought this question to the surface: should parks like SeaWorld be closed down for safety reasons? While this argument has been going on for a long time, the death of Brancheau spurred a wave of debates about whether the park should be allowed to remain open. On one side, people believe the parks should be shut down and the animals should be released from captivity in an effort to protect the animals and the humans. On the other side of the argument, people believe the parks should be kept open because of the benefits they offer to the world in education and conservation. In light of SeaWorld’s recent transitions, I believe the park should remain open to the public.
Captivity is a term that has a range of definitions. The least restrictive would be an enclosed area that attempts to meet the physical social, physical, and medical needs of these animals. The most restrictive provide limited area for movement, social interaction, and does not provide needed regular medical attention. When referring to dialect in killer whales we are talking abo...
For decades SeaWorld has operated and advertised under the guise of being a happy family destination where children can interact and supposedly learn more about sea life and sea creatures. The documentary Blackfish, however, has illuminated the public on the shady practices of this world renowned park and the manner in which they mistreat their animals and endanger their employees. The death of SeaWorld whale trainer, Dawn Brancheau, sent out shockwaves to the public; was this supposedly educational, family-friendly Park not as safe as people thought? SeaWorld scrambled and changed their story multiple times as to how the incident occurred and denied that they were at fault. The world-famous sea park built up such a celebrity status with their main attraction, “Shamu” that they could not possibly let the name be smeared by the death of an employee. What the research gathered hear proposes is that SeaWorld has built such an empire with the “Shamu” moniker and the killer whales’ “celebrity-ism”, that it’s gotten to the point where they are simply exploiting intelligent creatures to line their pockets with money.
Stotts uses scholarly articles, newspaper articles and historical monographs to show the changing ideologies and perception of zoological parks in America. He addresses the reasons adults and children alike were attracted to these parks. Stotts addresses the appeal of the zoo to American families, which extends upon the social history of the United States. Furthermore he addresses how zoos came to become sanctuaries, preservers and protectors of America’s wildlife for future generations.
The first step in this process was to make an observation. In order to do this you have to be out in the field of work. The observation that was made in this predicament is that more than half of all corals were dying. Paragraph 4, it states, ““Between 1996 and 2012, more than half of all corals in the Florida Keys alone had died”, says Porter.” What the author is elaborating is that half of a population of sea life has died and other marine life depended on those organisms. “The greatest decline was in Elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata). From the authors point of view this me4ans that this particularly species was hit the hardest.
Thesis Statement: Closing SeaWorld’s doors would be unjust, however; SeaWorld can repair its image by providing excellent care for its current residents and by shifting the business model from entertainment to rescue, rehabilitate and release at all locations.
The utilitarian foundation of argumentation indirectly taken by the producers of this film is one that focuses on the consequences as a means of determining what one ought to do. Utilitarianism argues one ought to commit acts that affects invoke more pleasure than pain or suffering. In the case of The Cove, Richard O’Barry and Louie Psihoyos , as well as other individuals chosen for the task of videotaping and creating the exposé, continually argue a few major points. One area where Richard O’Barry disagrees but the others seem to care little is the fact that dolphins are herded and initially chosen for performance purposes at water parks around the world. This showcases the manner in which many see the positives of entertaining individu...
...emale leatherback turtle and her habits in order to fully understand this critically endangered marine animal.
This anthropocentric theme continues throughout his narrative but is personified on a societal level. This matter is first introduced in the chapter “Polemic: Industrial Tourism and The National Parks.” In this chapter Abbey notes the expansionist nature of the industrial economy and how it is affecting the national parks. Abbey critiques arguments for uni...
[9] Deep sea and extreme shallow water habitats: affinities and adaptions by Franz Uiblein, Jorg Ott and Michael Stacowitsh 1996
The 'Secondary'. Whale watching 2001: worldwide tourism numbers, expenditures, and expanding socioeconomic benefits. International Fund for Animal Welfare. Redfern, J. V., McKenna, M. F., Moore, T. J., Calambokidis, J., Deangelis, M. L., Becker, E. A. & Chivers, S. J. a. The adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the adage of the ad Assessing the risk of ships striking large whales in marine spatial planning.
Also why do we have the right to see some animals but not all of them? If animals should be given rights and treated fairly why should we give some more freedoms than others. His argument here seems pointless, zoos help with the protection of species, they have contributed to the conservation of tigers ever since they have become endangered. “It has been predicted all tigers may become extinct in the wild within the next decade.”(Kasnoff) the cause of the decreases in population are usually caused by the destruction of there habits by humans. If anything we should expect or hope to see one there, sure there freedom might be limited but I and the tigers would prefer limited movement over extinction. “A lot of very nasty things happen to truly ‘wild’ animals that simply don’t happen in good zoos and to cast a life that is ‘free’ as one that is ‘good’ is, I think, an error.”(Hone) Animals in the wild could die in one thousand different ways, at least in captivity there are people to there to take care of them and help them when they get sick or
...li, Brita. "Defender of the Seas." E: The Environmental Magazine 23.1 (2012): 18-25. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Animals are used for people 's entertainment or own benefits, but the question is what benefits do they get? Do they even get any? This paper tells about the things animals go through to help or just entertain us in life. For example the tiny cramped places animals are forced into. If the animals don 't perform well in zoos or circuses a lot of times they simple won 't feed them. The owners beating them for nothing. Lastly experiments on them and they can not even defend themselves. Animals should not be used for human benefit. Using animals for any kind of entertainment or experiment can be considered against the law especially if they are put in poor conditions and harmed. Animals have rights that should be taken seriously. Animals also have