Arthur Cleveland Coxe vs. Nathaniel Hawthorne

In Arthur Cleveland Coxe’s review of The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, he repeatedly criticizes the novel and expresses his moral disapproval for the story. Distinctively, Coxe argues that lying is made out to be a worse sin than adultery, that Hawthorne intends for the evil-doing characters to stand out and be specifically fascinating, and that the novel overall is entirely rude in that it attempts to accumulate pity for the sinners. Taken as a whole, Coxe feels that the novel challenges ethics which he and his fellow-church-goers have been holding true for hundreds of years. I mostly disagree, but there is some truth in his statements.

I have mixed feelings about Coxe’s standpoint that lying is considered a bigger deal than adultery in the novel. “The sin of her seducer too, seems to be considered as lying not so much in the deed itself, as in his long concealment of it.” It is clear that in The Scarlet Letter, lying and hiding the truth physically, emotionally, and mentally impacts Dimmesdale. However, it is not given higher importance than the si...