Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how you define art
Explain the relationship between morality and science.
ethics in basic sciences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how you define art
Some may believe that art as art serves beauty, not morality. They believe that the purpose of art is only to express beauty and it may do as it chooses in search for this perfection. As defined by dictionary.com, art is “the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.” Others believe in “art for art’s sake.” However, Tolstoy opposes this when he contends, “there is no such thing as art for art’s sake, anymore than science for science’s sake, since every human function should be directed to increase morality and to suppress violence” (Corey 113). People who believe that art should be kept separate from anything else might compare it to science. To many, science is usually separated from morality, as evidenced through the many petitions that have been created to question the morality of certain experiments. As such, science is indifferent to morals; science is wrought with speculation; it perfects the understanding in order to gain knowledge. The scientist has for his purpose truth and he concentrates all his attention towards his quest for the truth. Rationally to some, it is true that science cares not for morality. Science is only here to seek the truth, and towards this end, the act of seeking does not mean to incite action. But the goal of art is essentially practical. Art, in its truest form, must appeal not only to the mind but to the whole man; it affects not only his mental attitudes but most importantly, his perception. Thus, the artist has no obligation to preach morality, but he must express a comment about society as a whole through his work of art by giving his audience a new perspective. Towards the end of the ... ... middle of paper ... ...rtist should be devoted to the ultimate purpose of what he creates. There must be layers of depth in an artwork; superficiality should never be commended. The true artist must realize the importance of the moral objective because that is when he realizes the fundamental issues of life and serves a social purpose, and as such, lives a life with meaning. One must realize that there can be no morality greater than recognizing the importance of social progress in life. In an artist’s journey to express life’s continuous drive for richer fulfillment, every single artist becomes a moralist. If an artist lives with this goal in mind, his art pieces are fundamentally moral and he has a prophetic role to play. And he may even be more successful than a story with the only goal of teaching a moral lesson, for a good story is a moral in itself, more readable, and more artistic.
A lot of people might be doubtful that art has much power to make the world a better place. If you asked they would probably summarize art as scribbles or
Their handwork is seen as vandalizing of property despite the effort and intricacy of their lines to execute a printed-like work of art that may be a remembrance portrait or sometimes just a word. In cases like these, Tolstoy advises his audience to divide the two because one has absolutely no effect on the other. He says “subject matter” that the artist is portraying through the art are “independent” and “set apart form the quality of the art” (155). Bad art depends solely on its level of effects on its auditor. “The stronger the infection, the better is the art as art” as it cannot be judged by the content according to Tolstoy (153). He also sees art more or so moral if spiritual. Tolstoy says “it is not a work of art if it does not evoke that feeling of… spiritual union” between the auditor and the artist. The artist is supposed to portray a work of art that aim’s at the “spiritual life of man and humanity” (174). So the mural graffiti artist does not have the motive of “passing on spiritual strength” through the composition of his or her work of art, providing Christian context, then according to Tolstoy, it is not “true art” (195). Being that he is a devout Christian, as confirmed in his book What I Believe, Tolstoy believes that everyone should follow his way, which seems like he feels is the only right way. Instead of leaving the realms of religion
Before you begin reading this paper, look through the appendix. Are you shocked? Disgusted? Intrigued? Viewers of such controversial artwork often experience a wide spectrum of reactions ranging from the petrified to the pleased. Questions may arise within the viewer regarding the artistic merit and legitimacy of this unorthodox artwork. However, art's primary purpose, according to Maya Angelou, “is to serve humanity. Art that does not increase our understanding of this particular journey or our ability to withstand this particular journey, which is life, is an exercise in futile indulgence” (Buchwalter 27). To expand on Angelou's analogy, because everyone experiences a different life journey, art is different to everyone. In other words, art is subjective to the viewer. The viewer creates his own definition of what is art and what is not art. Some may recognize the artistic value of a piece of artwork, while others may find it obscene. Some may praise the artwork, while others will protest it. Censorship is derived from these differing perspectives on artwork. Through censorship, communities seek to establish boundaries and criteria that limit an artist's ability to produce “proper” artwork. However, some artists choose to ignore these boundaries in order to expand the scope of art and, in their view, better serve humanity.
I am an artist. That is not a disclaimer or a boast; it is a statement of position. I believe in the undeniable importance of art and the futility of censorship. I also believe that art is one of the best indicators of the mood of a culture. Scholars, doctors, therapists, and lawyers can attempt to explain us to ourselves, but their testimony, while useful, will almost always be dry and lacking in emotional depth. I am proud to write in defense of a group that predates and outlasts all other professional analysts of the human condition-creators of art.
Our perception of moral judgments sometimes affects the ways in which knowledge is produced. In these two areas of knowledge, the natural sciences and the arts, the ways of knowing are different as is the nature of the knowledge produced. Likewise, ethical judgments may or may not limit knowledge in these areas but in different ways. Ethical judgments may lead to questioning the means by which some scientific knowledge is produced. Significant, meaningful works of art are produced only when the artist is able to transmit an emotion to the spectator, reader or listener effectively. This is why powerful emotional reactions to a work of art sometimes produce strong and often opposing ethical judgements which can limit the artist’s opportunities to produce knowledge.
It is art fulfilling its role in society. It is art that brings the moral issues. It is art that makes us human.
What would happen if every time a person invested emotion into art, they perished? That is the idea that Oscar Wilde presented in his 1891 novel The Picture of Dorian Gray. The Picture of Dorian Gray focuses largely on the idea that art should only exist for beauty and admiration. An audience should not invest emotion into art, because it is proven by the novel that it can only end badly. Art should simply exist for the sake of being art. The Aesthetic Movement has lasted much into the modern world and spread between many cultures. The Aesthetic Movement thrived because of The Picture of Dorian Gray.
Throughout the history of , which is arguably the length of time held within the universe, not much has been distorted. Art, along with is an incredibly difficult subject to comprehend, due to the varying nature of themes, opinions, and judgments. Not to cite all the societies, time periods, ethnicities, age and gender biased opinions. It is neither a science, nor a philosophy. It is both. within itself is a beauty, which will forever perplex the minds of the world. Art, placed in the neighborhood of philosophy and science reveals its innate inclination, (although undefined) to forever intrigue and perplex both the scientific and philosophical minds.
Based on this creator-centric definition, one may claim that art is purely a form of individual expression, and therefore creation of art should not be hindered by ethical consideration. Tattoos as pieces of artwork offer a great example of this issue. However, one may take it from the viewer’s perspective and claim that because art heavily involves emotion and the response of a community after viewing it, the message behind what is being presented is what should actually be judged. To what extent do ethical judgements limit the way the arts are created?... ...
Relationship Between Art And Society: Mimesis. The relationship between art and society: Mimesis as discussed in the works of Aristotle, Plato, Horace and Longinus. The relationship between art and society in the works of Plato is based upon his idea of the world of eternal Forms. He believed that there is a world of eternal, absolute and immutable Forms (the world of the Ideal) and thought that this is proven by when man is faced with the appearance of anything in the material world, his mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea or an absolute and immutable version of the thing he sees.
Throughout the ages art has played a crucial role in life. Art is universal and because art is everywhere, we experience it on a daily basis. From the houses we live in (architecture) to the movies we see (theatre) to the books that we read (literature). Even in ancient culture art has played a crucial role. In prehistoric times cave dwellers drew on the wall of caves to record history. In biblical times paintings recorded the life and death of Christ. Throughout time art has recorded history. Most art is created for a specific reason or purpose, it has a way of expressing ideas and beliefs, and it can record the experiences of all people.
...ns something when it imitates nature and delivers facts of history or culture. Art is the exploration of what it is to be alive, to be human and struggling to understand one’s role within society and identity in general. By stretching the limits of what is acceptable, the artist questions preconceived ideas of what is ugly and beautiful, important and unimportant. These ideas in art and society are influenced by the emergence of new technologies that expand human understanding. Since technology improves and human understanding is bolstered by these theories (both philosophical and scientific), then art will always have a place. The artist’s place is to criticize and express the tendencies and attitudes of himself and of society. Even if those feelings are marginalized, their expression makes the audience aware of them, and begs them to ask questions of themselves.
Art and science (to be more specific, natural science) are essential parts of our society and areas of knowledge, as are ethics. One must wonder what impact our ethical judgements, our decisions based on moral principles, have on these two. Our morals are the laws and standards that we make and believe in. Ethical judgements often limit the production of knowledge from the natural science as well as from art; however, art can be born out of ethical judgements. Ethics are often deeply involved in anything we do and in much of our knowledge. We ask ourselves if something is ethical or not based on one system of morality of another. Individuals who are proficient in the natural sciences often confront ethical roadblocks that seem to hinder human innovative progress. The same has been and continues to be seen in the arts. Artists are often tempted not to follow through or even begin with projects that they believe to be immoral according to their own beliefs or the beliefs of others. Such art is often censored if it ever is produced; however, it is our morals that allow us to create art and separate it from the rest of the world. Our ethical judgements limit and create much of the art that is (or could have been) around us today.
Morality is determined by culture and experiences and differs among people. If there would not be something like moral code, the production of knowledge in art, the same as in natural science, would not have any limitations. Using examples from art and biology I will try to show how ethical judgements limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the arts and the natural sciences, but also I will try to explain my statement that such limitations are necessary. Humans are very complicated organisms, and even with so much developed technology scientists are not able to uncover all the mysteries of the human body. That will be easier while the studies and experiments on humans are allowed.
Personally, my culture did not play a big role when I was in the midst