André Bazin: Film Critic Extraordinaire

989 Words2 Pages

As time evolved so did the means of replicating reality. As far back as cave drawings, humans have tried to make sense of their surroundings through artificial means. We can go through time and see this process evolve from engraving, to painting, to photography, and to its most convincing form to date: cinema. In the task of duplicating reality cinema has surpassed all other forms of representation. Looking at the other means which are mentioned above we see cinema is the first mean that is able to capture movement, and nowadays even sound. André Bazin may well be the most influential critic ever to have written about this process. As …. States: “Bazin envisions each rung on cinema's evolutionary ladder as a step toward a more realistic depiction of the world (sound, colour, depth of field, 3- D, etc.)”. Since Bazin believes that the origins of an art reveal its nature, cinema's quest for realism supports his claim for an objective and pure cinema (…). By using the term pure cinema Basin refers to the truest form of recreating reality. This myth of pure cinema which grew out of cinema's beginnings stands as the standard cinema has progressively evolved toward. Bazin sees cinema as “an idealistic phenomenon” and only consequently technical. Being a humanist he believes that the idea precedes the invention and hence is superior to the technical means used to achieve it (…). To Bazin the cinema is inherently realistic even though the potential for human interference is always present. The myth of total cinema Bazin speaks of concerns the belief that humans’ psychology will always leave men with the need to portray reality, possibly as a way to fight back against mortality. Bazin explains the relationship between the filmed image and... ... middle of paper ... ...more absorbed into the film. As one watches a car crash it is not, in fact realistic that one stays seated in a chair. Even though the movement will not be able to recreate any of the effects that should go along with this example of a car crash, and luckily so, it will enhance the experience of seeing action bound mise en scenes. So the question remains: what applications does Bazin's work have in today's cinema? The reality cinema captures is largely the subjective reality of the filmmakers' distinct worldview and not Bazin's "objectivity in time". You could say, however, that cinema is about different levels of representation, and that the differences between fiction and reality, between subjective and objective, no longer exist. However, you still haven’t established whether modern day cinema is worth looking at as work of narrative art or corporate indulgence.

Open Document